-
Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Oh Dear Indeed!
- Thread starter class 313
- Start date
- Status
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
T
Tom
Guest
...at South London magistrates court on 14th April 2007.
T
Tom
Guest
You can be convicted without being present. 
Ascot
Established Member
Bit like the old CT Name and Shame that's been going round for years and their website, always looked out for that name every month though.
Mintona
Established Member
Blimey, that's a lot for one ticket! Man should have just paid.
thefab444
Established Member
"No more bunking it to Basingstoke"
"No more chancing it to Chessington"
"No more dodging it to Dorking"
Actually, was it Dorking you could dodge to?
"No more chancing it to Chessington"
"No more dodging it to Dorking"
Actually, was it Dorking you could dodge to?
NSEFAN
Established Member
"No more evading it to Eastleigh"
If that is at all possible to do - don't know much about where the barriers are these days :-?
If that is at all possible to do - don't know much about where the barriers are these days :-?
thefab444
Established Member
Eastleigh currently has no barriers and only has "revs" occasionally. Normally you can just walk in and out as you please. Also, once when I arrived for a spot of vegging there were no RPIs present, but by the time I left they were in position, they just let me walk through anyway.
Sadly for us veg, there are plans to install barriers.
No more blinging it to Boxhill & Westhumble
JS
Sadly for us veg, there are plans to install barriers.
No more blinging it to Boxhill & Westhumble
JS
TheSlash
Established Member
You can sit in the Eastleigh messroom if you like, we never employ enough staff to fill it
You can sit in the Eastleigh messroom if you like, we never employ enough staff to fill it
Anyone at Eastleigh Thursday Fred n Fred will be vegging
.No More Freeloading to Feltham
You've missed the point.
Possibly not our good friend, but I guess the figure could be generic (why would a convicted faredodger agree to pose like that?) and designer bit could be a made up occupation? The routing would also prevent having to pass through any barriers
Mmm...thought SK was a mate of yours.Possibly not our good friend, but I guess the figure could be generic (why would a convicted faredodger agree to pose like that?) and designer bit could be a made up occupation? The routing would also prevent having to pass through any barriers
Bah, I couldn't find it yesterday!
Nice spot anyway Tom, and cheers Damon for fotting it
And Bighat, I don't really think alot of people on here like him, as AFAIK all of us (excl. those with entitled free travel) buy tickets for travel.
Nice spot anyway Tom, and cheers Damon for fotting it
And Bighat, I don't really think alot of people on here like him, as AFAIK all of us (excl. those with entitled free travel) buy tickets for travel.
Ascot
Established Member
I think he's on about that thing on Coxters website where he said me and a mate or something like that :razz:
Well he is a designer of Privs so there right and they had to use that pic because the chair you sit on wasn't high enough for his head to be in the camera shot.
Re-read the last line of Loader's original postNice spot anyway Tom, and cheers Damon for fotting it
Never said he wasn'tMmm...thought SK was a mate of yours.
Merely took a picutre and let others draw their own conclusions, pointing out the route didn't start/finish at any barriered stations 
Hit the nail on the head!
I have locked this topic, as it has run it's course.
The discussion about two people who travelled on trains wearing uniforms was removed.
Mr 'B' admits he was wrong to do what he did, and regrets the incident, however he was given the uniform and was not using it in order to gain any advantage. However, the subject has been referred to MML and it up to them what they do.
Mr 'K' does indeed appear on a training video removing a uniform from a locker at Euston without permission, he was arrested but was not charged as this was over a year ago (he was 15 then and is 17 now) and as he was under 16 it was deemed "not in the public interest" to prosecute.
Both culprits have been delt with - or are being delt with - so there is no need for further comment here. I am sure no-one on here condones impersonating railway staff, so the matter should now be closed!
The discussion about two people who travelled on trains wearing uniforms was removed.
Mr 'B' admits he was wrong to do what he did, and regrets the incident, however he was given the uniform and was not using it in order to gain any advantage. However, the subject has been referred to MML and it up to them what they do.
Mr 'K' does indeed appear on a training video removing a uniform from a locker at Euston without permission, he was arrested but was not charged as this was over a year ago (he was 15 then and is 17 now) and as he was under 16 it was deemed "not in the public interest" to prosecute.
Both culprits have been delt with - or are being delt with - so there is no need for further comment here. I am sure no-one on here condones impersonating railway staff, so the matter should now be closed!
- Status