- Joined
- 23 Mar 2011
- Messages
- 2,631
Leave it. Now. 
We were talking about it in the context of news, as you said in your post! http://www.railforums.co.uk/showpost.php?p=684474&postcount=15
you've been swallowing their propoganda hook line and sinker
no, you merely tried to claim, unsuccessfully, that the BBC could do no wrong
Your postings are starting to amuse me now. I was prepared to take you seriously.
I'd never make the mistake of taking yours seriously
So go on then, show me somewhere where the BBC news reporting has been biased?
I really don't believe any newspaper can comment at all on impartiality or bias!! They all are one way or another biased, much more so than the BBC is.
This ARTICLE, is rediculous. It actively suggests that the airline in question had broken safety rules, which was confirmed to be completely untrue by the aviation authorities. The wording of the article is constantly extreme and misleading.
I think this thread is a hint that not that many people are that interested in the Obama visit. Much less so than the Queen's visit to Ireland, which was a historic moment.
And the conservatives. And the Lib Dems. And the BNPs. And the Green Party.
Impartial does not mean not allowed to report opinions.
Impartial mean that they are not allowed to report opinions as fact
you've been swallowing their propoganda hook line and sinker
The Daily Mail is not obliged to be impartial, still if you're scared of hard work and truth don't read it
Apparently it took seven hours to set up Obama's table at the Royal Banquet. :roll:
Hopefully sausages were on the menu! If there was a clip of Obama eating bangers and mash it would dispel the rumours extremist Republicans (and those of evangelical nutters like Pat Robertson) that he's a closet muslim!