• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Nottingham City Transport

ChrisC

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2018
Messages
2,258
Location
Nottinghamshire
It would if routes like Transdev's 36 Ripon to Leeds weren't twice as long as anything NCT regularly runs double deckers on. - a typical well-specified double decker does 10 trips a day - a little over 450km .
Closer to Nottingham, Stagecoach in Chesterfield are using electric double deckers on the 170 between Chesterfield and Bakewell via Chatsworth. Also the very long X17 route from Wirksworth/Matlock to Chesterfield and on to Sheffield and Barnsley. Both of these are quite hilly routes especially the X17 around Matlock.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Teapot42

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2022
Messages
1,127
Closer to Nottingham, Stagecoach in Chesterfield are using electric double deckers on the 170 between Chesterfield and Bakewell via Chatsworth. Also the very long X17 route from Wirksworth/Matlock to Chesterfield and on to Sheffield and Barnsley. Both of these are quite hilly routes especially the X17 around Matlock.
It's worth noting that the E400EVs they use on the X17 have to be swapped out during the day on to a shorter route. There was a period when the E400EVs weren't able to be used and the Yutong E12s had to substitute - they seemed more than capable of doing a full day in service.

The 170 isn't a particularly long route and doesn't operate late in to the evening - something like the 43/44 or 50 probably cover more miles.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,665
Location
Nottingham
It's worth noting that the E400EVs they use on the X17 have to be swapped out during the day on to a shorter route. There was a period when the E400EVs weren't able to be used and the Yutong E12s had to substitute - they seemed more than capable of doing a full day in service.

The 170 isn't a particularly long route and doesn't operate late in to the evening - something like the 43/44 or 50 probably cover more miles.
170 does include a long climb though.

I'm beginning to think NCT is being over-cautious.
 

Andy Pacer

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2017
Messages
3,504
Location
Leicestershire
Presumably one reason for using diesel on the 90 is that their electric single deck order would have been placed and completed before the 90 started so there simply wouldn't be enough.
 

Dwarfer1979

Member
Joined
24 Feb 2025
Messages
448
Location
Leicester
It would if routes like Transdev's 36 Ripon to Leeds weren't twice as long as anything NCT regularly runs double deckers on. - a typical well-specified double decker does 10 trips a day - a little over 450km .
Transdev 36's do have top up chargers in Harrogate so they get some extra charge on most pauses in the Bus Station which gives a level of safety headroom but this requires more investment and somewhere to install those chargers. Theoretically ADL say their E400EV can do up to 620km when new (though that probably drops by some amount with significant amounts of fast non-stop running) and whilst that is probably pretty top end it does show we have reached a point where there are probably few bus workings that can't be electrified with the latest versions of most manufacturers models. It is just that at this point it still makes some sense to target that electric investment on more urban cycles where electrics are most efficient and the benefits to wider society through no emissions in areas of denser population. There are probably few normal bus workings now that are too long for battery electrics when new and not too many more that would probably cause an issue later in the vehicles life cycle.
I'm beginning to think NCT is being over-cautious.
I think that was clear from fairly early on when they said there were no suitable double-deckers for any of their routes when other cities (Oxford, Leicester & Coventry) were already starting to go for full replacement.

Presumably one reason for using diesel on the 90 is that their electric single deck order would have been placed and completed before the 90 started so there simply wouldn't be enough.
In the case of the 90 that is probably the decisive bit, they weren't expecting to run the 90 when they ordered their electrics and don't have enough on stock to cover the full PVR safely so it makes sense to not do so routinely. I wouldn't be surprised to see spare electrics on the 90 when needed, assuming they didn't down spec their battery capacity too much because they were bought as urban buses.
 

Hyebone

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
480
Location
Chesterfield, Derbyshire.
It would if routes like Transdev's 36 Ripon to Leeds weren't twice as long as anything NCT regularly runs double deckers on. - a typical well-specified double decker does 10 trips a day - a little over 450km .
I've thought about this before. NCT have always been known to over-spec vehicles; whether that's a downside in this situation, I can't tell.
There was a period when the E400EVs weren't able to be used and the Yutong E12s had to substitute - they seemed more than capable of doing a full day in service.
That was an unrelated issue. The unreliability of the Enviro400EV is well documented across companies, particularly Stagecoach in Chesterfield. NCT would be wise to steer clear.

I don't see an issue with the allocated Solo SRs are a problem. NCT are using available vehicles initially to test the waters; after all, they've taken on a commercial venture. If the service proves itself, new vehicles will surely follow.
 

Andy Pacer

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2017
Messages
3,504
Location
Leicestershire
In the case of the 90 that is probably the decisive bit, they weren't expecting to run the 90 when they ordered their electrics and don't have enough on stock to cover the full PVR safely so it makes sense to not do so routinely. I wouldn't be surprised to see spare electrics on the 90 when needed, assuming they didn't down spec their battery capacity too much because they were bought as urban buses.
That's my expectation, certainly wouldn't be surprised to see the odd electric popping up (probably branded for something else!)
 

MEC

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2025
Messages
71
Location
City of Glass
I've thought about this before. NCT have always been known to over-spec vehicles; whether that's a downside in this situation, I can't tell.

That was an unrelated issue. The unreliability of the Enviro400EV is well documented across companies, particularly Stagecoach in Chesterfield. NCT would be wise to steer clear.

I don't see an issue with the allocated Solo SRs are a problem. NCT are using available vehicles initially to test the waters; after all, they've taken on a commercial venture. If the service proves itself, new vehicles will surely follow.
If they are reluctant to get electrics for the 90 maybe they'll go for a Scania fencer, who knows
 

Teapot42

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2022
Messages
1,127
That was an unrelated issue. The unreliability of the Enviro400EV is well documented across companies, particularly Stagecoach in Chesterfield. NCT would be wise to steer clear.
I think you misunderstood my point. I was saying the E12 has a better range then the E400EV based on performance on the X17.

Are the E400EVs doing that badly in Chesterfield? There were teething issues certainly, but things seem to have settled down now. I've not seen a lot of failures or service cancellations. Still the odd one, and again compared to the Yutongs they don't come off well, but it doesn't seem to be a complete disaster.

(Not that I like them - the seats are terrible, even for fairly short journeys. Who thought they were suitable for a run such as Wirksworth to Barnsley I really don't know!)
 

cnjb8

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
2,303
Location
Nottingham
Transdev 36's do have top up chargers in Harrogate so they get some extra charge on most pauses in the Bus Station which gives a level of safety headroom but this requires more investment and somewhere to install those chargers. Theoretically ADL say their E400EV can do up to 620km when new (though that probably drops by some amount with significant amounts of fast non-stop running) and whilst that is probably pretty top end it does show we have reached a point where there are probably few bus workings that can't be electrified with the latest versions of most manufacturers models. It is just that at this point it still makes some sense to target that electric investment on more urban cycles where electrics are most efficient and the benefits to wider society through no emissions in areas of denser population. There are probably few normal bus workings now that are too long for battery electrics when new and not too many more that would probably cause an issue later in the vehicles life cycle.

I think that was clear from fairly early on when they said there were no suitable double-deckers for any of their routes when other cities (Oxford, Leicester & Coventry) were already starting to go for full replacement.


In the case of the 90 that is probably the decisive bit, they weren't expecting to run the 90 when they ordered their electrics and don't have enough on stock to cover the full PVR safely so it makes sense to not do so routinely. I wouldn't be surprised to see spare electrics on the 90 when needed, assuming they didn't down spec their battery capacity too much because they were bought as urban buses.
The 90 would not have been included in the ZEBRA bid so you would be correct
 

callum3490

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2024
Messages
210
Location
Nottingham
Is it somewhat odd that the new ultroliners have 4 branded for the 26 then the remaining 2 for lilac line? Unless the pvr has or is increased will this not displace 2 of the gas e400s? Surely it would’ve made more sense for the other 2 to be generic spares?

Also odd that the pathfinder e400s have gone to spares rather than uni4 to displace the omnidekkas
 

38291018

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2024
Messages
228
Location
England
Is it somewhat odd that the new ultroliners have 4 branded for the 26 then the remaining 2 for lilac line? Unless the pvr has or is increased will this not displace 2 of the gas e400s? Surely it would’ve made more sense for the other 2 to be generic spares?

Also odd that the pathfinder e400s have gone to spares rather than uni4 to displace the omnidekkas
I see your point and do agree but with those electric deckers they are getting, that whatever they replace may become uni4 who knows
 

callum3490

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2024
Messages
210
Location
Nottingham
I see your point and do agree but with those electric deckers they are getting, that whatever they replace may become uni4 who knows
Potentially - although i’ve not seen/heard the rumour mill there either as to whats likely to benefit from the electrics too

43/44 would seem logical and relatively short routes to suit electrics, 77 also used to see fairly regular upgrades and again a relatively short route by comparison to some. Maybe uni4 will end up with gas e400s which could end up shifting out the oldest e400s eventually
 

Np13

Member
Joined
22 Dec 2019
Messages
89
Location
Nottingham
It did one inbound run on 24 then one inbound run on 26. Here it is at Linden Grove in Gedling
 

Attachments

  • Messenger_creation_076ADC93-B6FF-4923-97C7-2D25D3CC9473.jpeg
    Messenger_creation_076ADC93-B6FF-4923-97C7-2D25D3CC9473.jpeg
    329.1 KB · Views: 121

liamf656

Established Member
Joined
2 Aug 2020
Messages
1,715
Location
Derby
Just posted on the NET Tram thread


Tram passengers have been treated for minor injuries after a tram was derailed in a bus crash.

Nottinghamshire Fire and Rescue Service said all passengers were safe and some were treated for their injuries at the scene in Inham Road in Chilwell on Thursday morning.

Nottingham City Transport said there were "severe delays" on the Orange 36 line because of the crash.

Nottingham Express Transit (NET) said there were currently no tram services between Toton Lane and Bramcote Lane.

 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1771497970797.jpg
    FB_IMG_1771497970797.jpg
    145.9 KB · Views: 73

StavBered

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2026
Messages
89
Location
Derbyshire
Just posted on the NET Tram thread




Looks like the 36 took the brunt of it, lots of damage at the front, I hope everyone is okay
 

TR673

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2019
Messages
119
Location
Nottingham
Just posted on the NET Tram thread




IMG_2749.JPG
Well, a few hours later and the tram's still there, blocking the road. And the traffic light optimistically shows green! A fairly infrequent tram replacement service is being run between Bramcote Lane and Toton lane using E400 spare 602.

I wonder which'll get returned to service first, NCT 529 or NET 228?
Hope both drivers are doing alright.
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,573
Looking at the damage both vehicles have received can both vehicles be fixed and will both vehicles eventually return to service? It does seem most damage has been caused to the tram looking at various photos meaning it could be out of service for a while.
 

callum3490

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2024
Messages
210
Location
Nottingham
Looking at the damage both vehicles have received can both vehicles be fixed and will both vehicles eventually return to service? It does seem most damage has been caused to the tram looking at various photos meaning it could be out of service for a while.
I would say the trams damage looks more cosmetic where as NCTs 529 is going to be structural

I’ve seen worse repaired and returned to service however
 

37114

Member
Joined
4 Jul 2019
Messages
511
I wonder if that bus is even repairable economically, I suspect everything forward of the front axle downstairs needs replacing.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
28,665
Location
Nottingham
Buses tend to have much shorter service lives than trams, and trams are much more expensive to replace and therefore much more worth attempting to repair. I'd also agree that the damage to the tram is more likely to be cosmetic, with the possible exception of articulations.
 

MCR247

Established Member
Joined
7 Nov 2008
Messages
10,292
Did NCT lose a Lilac biogas DD after hitting something on Carlton Hill or did that get repaired? There was also the Solo SR that ended up in Argos(?)
 

callum3490

Member
Joined
9 Oct 2024
Messages
210
Location
Nottingham
Did NCT lose a Lilac biogas DD after hitting something on Carlton Hill or did that get repaired? There was also the Solo SR that ended up in Argos(?)
Both were repaired and returned to service, to my knowledge

I’d be very surprised if 529 isnt repaired especially given its age
 

M60lad

Established Member
Joined
31 May 2011
Messages
1,573
Any idea of where both bus and tram will go to get repaired? Will the repairs be done in house or will they go away to be repaired?
 

tram21

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2022
Messages
1,318
Location
Nottingham
Any idea of where both bus and tram will go to get repaired? Will the repairs be done in house or will they go away to be repaired?
The tram will be repaired in house at the depot, unless complex structural repairs are needed, in which case it'll go by road to Alstom Litchurch Lane. This will be avoided unless absolutely necessary, it just depends on the extent of the damage under the surface.

The same tram was in a very bad collision last June at Queens Walk where it hit a traction pole, but it was actually just cosmetic damage and it was all repaired in house, despite it looking extremely destroyed!

I have no idea where buses are repaired. Something this severe probably at the ADL factory in Scarborough?
 

ACBest

Member
Joined
30 Aug 2011
Messages
349
Location
Lincoln
The tram will be repaired in house at the depot, unless complex structural repairs are needed, in which case it'll go by road to Alstom Litchurch Lane. This will be avoided unless absolutely necessary, it just depends on the extent of the damage under the surface.

The same tram was in a very bad collision last June at Queens Walk where it hit a traction pole, but it was actually just cosmetic damage and it was all repaired in house, despite it looking extremely destroyed!

I have no idea where buses are repaired. Something this severe probably at the ADL factory in Scarborough?
ADL vehicles usually go to their facility in Anston (half way between Worksop and Rotherham) for major repairs.
 

Trainman40083

Established Member
Joined
29 Jan 2024
Messages
4,603
Location
Derby
The tram will be repaired in house at the depot, unless complex structural repairs are needed, in which case it'll go by road to Alstom Litchurch Lane. This will be avoided unless absolutely necessary, it just depends on the extent of the damage under the surface.

The same tram was in a very bad collision last June at Queens Walk where it hit a traction pole, but it was actually just cosmetic damage and it was all repaired in house, despite it looking extremely destroyed!

I have no idea where buses are repaired. Something this severe probably at the ADL factory in Scarborough?
It's the same tram? Blimey getting like certain trains, that had more than one incident.
 

Top