• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Not so Greater Anglia

Status
Not open for further replies.

captainbigun

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
977
The infrastructure issues shouldn't come as a surprise to any franchisee, hardly a new feature! However, yesterday, cancelling a raft of trains, understandably, was somewhat hindered by then short forming some of those that did run. That's really inexusable, not as though there was a shortage of stock!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,096
Location
Redcar
However, yesterday, cancelling a raft of trains, understandably, was somewhat hindered by then short forming some of those that did run. That's really inexusable, not as though there was a shortage of stock!

It depends on where the stock is surely? If loads of it is trapped by the disruption then it's not going to be available to reinforce those services that do run.
 

captainbigun

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
977
It depends on where the stock is surely? If loads of it is trapped by the disruption then it's not going to be available to reinforce those services that do run.

There was little or no stock stuck at LST. Given the time it happened, all of the inbound peak stock was at the originating end.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
No bank slip anywhere to be found when they went to find it...!

Really? How odd. Now they've got flooding on the Cambridge-Ipswich line and a person hit by a train between Sherringham and Cromer... and they had "an obstruction on the line" near Colchester, and signalling problems at Stansted Airport
 

Pugwash

Member
Joined
17 Nov 2011
Messages
336
I suspect GA rather like all these delays, National Rail will pay them out and then very few passengers claim through delay repay.
 

andykn

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
232
So after yesterday's litany of out-of-their-control problems:
Liv St platforms 7-10 blocked because of a broken rail in point work
Liv St platforms 1-6 blocked because of signal failure
Bethnal Green points malfunction
Person hit by a train out on the mainline

... this morning has kicked off with a landslip near Audley End. They can't catch a break at the moment can they?

I have to say they recovered well, I'd been keeping a nervous eye on the twitter feed all day but the 17.30 Norwich-London was on time, a bit early into London if anything.
 

Flywaver

Member
Joined
10 Nov 2009
Messages
190
Reported by the first XC Stansted. Turnred out to be a tree we where told.

Nope reported by the 2nd XC Stansted i was the Driver....It was huge.. It was low light at 0530 so initially i thought it was a boulder as it was below the deepest part of the cutting. I managed to stop the job in time before the first Stansted got it on its return trip.... It was a tree trunk but upto coupling height so easily a derailment was possible. Im glad it was on the opposite line i have to admit... NR staff were inspecting the whole area when i passed on another trip around 12..All this water has nowhere to go. Lose tree trunks and roots then stability of embankments will be lost as well..
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
I have to say they recovered well, I'd been keeping a nervous eye on the twitter feed all day but the 17.30 Norwich-London was on time, a bit early into London if anything.

Aye, they seem to have been working very hard on service recovery, and information via Twitter has been exemplar (though they have occasionally had to use the back up account)
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,874
Location
East Anglia
Nope reported by the 2nd XC Stansted i was the Driver....It was huge.. It was low light at 0530 so initially i thought it was a boulder as it was below the deepest part of the cutting. I managed to stop the job in time before the first Stansted got it on its return trip.... It was a tree trunk but upto coupling height so easily a derailment was possible. Im glad it was on the opposite line i have to admit... NR staff were inspecting the whole area when i passed on another trip around 12..All this water has nowhere to go. Lose tree trunks and roots then stability of embankments will be lost as well..

& boy was there some water around. Norfolk seemed ok but Suffolk & especially Needham Market where saturated. Half way up some garden sheds!!
 

andykn

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
232
Aye, they seem to have been working very hard on service recovery, and information via Twitter has been exemplar (though they have occasionally had to use the back up account)

Yes, that got an ironic snort from me in the office, so much bad news they'd overloaded their tweet limit!
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Yes, that got an ironic snort from me in the office, so much bad news they'd overloaded their tweet limit!

I think the "going over the limit" is thanks to them trying to send personal replies to as many as possible
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,331
Location
Herts
Nope reported by the 2nd XC Stansted i was the Driver....It was huge.. It was low light at 0530 so initially i thought it was a boulder as it was below the deepest part of the cutting. I managed to stop the job in time before the first Stansted got it on its return trip.... It was a tree trunk but upto coupling height so easily a derailment was possible. Im glad it was on the opposite line i have to admit... NR staff were inspecting the whole area when i passed on another trip around 12..All this water has nowhere to go. Lose tree trunks and roots then stability of embankments will be lost as well..

Well done - hope your management picks up on this good work !
 

elementalpat

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2011
Messages
81
Points failure has struck Liverpool Street again!

Related to the problem earlier in the week perhaps?
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
So, do people think that the "service" has got better?

Infrastructure related problems are similar to how they were in NXEA days, but staff morale seems higher, trains are alot cleaner and there just seems to be a more positive buzz to the whole network. So yes, things are better :)
 

HH

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2009
Messages
4,505
Location
Essex
Infrastructure related problems are similar to how they were in NXEA days, but staff morale seems higher, trains are alot cleaner and there just seems to be a more positive buzz to the whole network. So yes, things are better :)

Their next step must be to engage more with NR and push them to sorting out some of those infrastructure problems. The area seems to have been going downhill for some time.
 

387star

On Moderation
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
6,665
Is there not extra pressure to look good with the olympics coming up which wiull directly affect Greater Anglia. I wonder how many spectators will travel on class 315 units :P
 

cj_1985

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
849
Location
Lanarkshire
there is one thing that i have not seen mentioned.. (although i apologise if i have missed it) its all the fuss that GA have made about the deep clean of their stock in time for the olympics... cleaning, even deep and heavy cleaning is not something that should be done just for a special event.. in this case visitors from overseas coming for the olympics, and we couldn't have them seeing how british passengers are treated/transported.

now i am more than willing to admit that this is not GAs fault... its down to lack of cleaning carried out while NX were in charge... but even so.. you should never have to draw attention to something that you have done (or are doing) that:
(i) You should have been doing anyway, and
(ii) something that you are only really doing now, because your forced to by a contract.

and that says alot about the DfT, if they saw fit to legaly forcewhoever was going to take over the Anglia regions railway operation (Ex Great Eastern, West Anglia and IC Anglia) in the form of the management contract, to clean the rolling stock interiors
 

Dunderhead

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2012
Messages
114
Location
Bournemouth
there is one thing that i have not seen mentioned.. (although i apologise if i have missed it) its all the fuss that GA have made about the deep clean of their stock in time for the olympics... cleaning, even deep and heavy cleaning is not something that should be done just for a special event.. in this case visitors from overseas coming for the olympics, and we couldn't have them seeing how british passengers are treated/transported.

now i am more than willing to admit that this is not GAs fault... its down to lack of cleaning carried out while NX were in charge... but even so.. you should never have to draw attention to something that you have done (or are doing) that:
(i) You should have been doing anyway, and
(ii) something that you are only really doing now, because your forced to by a contract.

and that says alot about the DfT, if they saw fit to legaly forcewhoever was going to take over the Anglia regions railway operation (Ex Great Eastern, West Anglia and IC Anglia) in the form of the management contract, to clean the rolling stock interiors

South West Trains seem to have no problems with keeping their stock clean and in excellent condition. What is it about the Greater Anglia region that makes this so much more difficult?
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
South West Trains seem to have no problems with keeping their stock clean and in excellent condition. What is it about the Greater Anglia region that makes this so much more difficult?

Stock is alot older and in a far worse state after years of neglect by penny-pinching NX, and the infrastructure is knackered and most of Liverpool Street's infrastructure is very very old now.
 

Dunderhead

Member
Joined
6 Mar 2012
Messages
114
Location
Bournemouth
Stock is alot older and in a far worse state after years of neglect by penny-pinching NX, and the infrastructure is knackered and most of Liverpool Street's infrastructure is very very old now.

So essentially, SWT only clean and maintain their trains because it's not very difficult to do so due to them already being clean and well-maintained? So perhaps Greater Anglia and their successors might be more likely to keep their trains clean now that they've been deep cleaned?
 

SprinterMan

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2010
Messages
2,341
Location
Hertford
So essentially, SWT only clean and maintain their trains because it's not very difficult to do so due to them already being clean and well-maintained? So perhaps Greater Anglia and their successors might be more likely to keep their trains clean now that they've been deep cleaned?

Yes, probably. NX let everything go to pot because of their money troubles with EC. GA have done a good job fixing things so far, and hopefully things stay clean. Just like its easier and quicker to clean a slightly dirty room than a filthy room, and you are more motivated to do it because it is an easier job. Well done to GA for doing what NX seemingly never did. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top