My local line goes through a forest and yesterday services were operated by a mix of 142s, 150s and 156s. There were some minor delays due to leaf fall problems but the only significant one was a service delayed by a signal problem. It seems the Chat Moss line with 319s and less trees faired badly in comparison.
But all the NW lines over which 319s operate don't seem to have an excessive amount of tree cover. I noticed that tracks tend generally to have wider margins up there than is normal for main routes down here, maybe because land itself is cheaper so it has survived the BR/Railtrack/National Rail stampede to sell every square metre outside the structure gauge that shrunk the SE routes' geographical footprints.