Whoops, yes, Wednesday 16th was my assessment day.Dates
While you could try timing things with your watch, I suspect you'd waste more time clock-watching than you'd gain by rushing out some answers at the end.
Whoops, yes, Wednesday 16th was my assessment day.Dates
I am curious to know what these million and one safety systems are and what the back up of those million and one safety systems are.
Who was the interview for, just interested to see who is rolling out the new style assessments.
Glenn25 'a little knowledge is a dangerous thing', can only assume you are trolling from your posts. HOWEVER I've also got to admit I do sometimes think that the driver assessment process has gone mad. Sure you can justify each part if you try hard enough but to me it just appears to be a way of whittling down the huge number of applicants that apply for driver positions. But then again I guess this is the whole point of any interview process, I'm not going to worry about it too much...
This argument seems to go round and round. People don't seem to understand what other people are required to do in their role as driver of <insert vehicle type here> and likewise some people believe their job the most important in existence.Just my opinion here - I hate the way certain people try to reduce train driving to the level of bus/truck driving or below. It isn't. The length of training and responsibility (potentially having 1000 passengers on board at 100 mph) makes the job to closer to being a airline pilot than a bus driver and I'm very proud of what I do.
You could easily argue than an airline pilots job is easier than a bus driver as a plane could operate on autopilot from take off to touchdown but no fool would make that comparison.
Additionally, the margin of error between a warning sign and the required reaction is far slimmer due to the increased speed, massively longer stopping distance, and the inability to manoeuvre.
As has been said, the only things allowed to be available to you during the GB is the test paper and a writing implement. This is to ensure that the test is fair and consistent for all, as if all sorts of devices started going off towards the end of the test many people would no doubt be put off at the least.Regarding using a timer, what I am suggesting is having an app or a device which gives you say a final 30 sec warning. I agree you don't really have time to clock watch.. I really think it would help if wrong answers are irrelevant.
I don't think driving experience on a game is anything like the real thing. Just my humble opinion.
Fair comment, Notadriver. There are not even any emergency situations for a start. My rendition of the Scarborough Bridge at circa 20 chains outside of York station would reinforce the opinion of missing realism. The features I described on the home stretch of the Scarborough down line are real however.
Having said that, the realism of the simulation depends on the amount of effort that you are prepared to invest. I actually emulated the same route on the up line in the opposite direction and I am fairly confident that most of the features of the line are present although the location of gradients will be inaccurate and Seamer station is about 3-5 chains out of sequence.
In my naivety, I believed that creating a simulator route for my private consumption would be quicker than the time it was taking to find a route on the internet.
I seem to remember from my experience with BVE Train Simuulator for the PC that the distance of warning boards to the actual start of the permanent speed restriction actually depends on the line speeds which I think was laid down in a document published by the RSSB.
Line speed is just only one factor you also have gradients and line speed reduction, AWS is provided if the speed reduction is 33% or greater generally. As quoted, you cannot really compare a computer game to the real thing but it will give you an insight of driving a train but not the insight of being a train driver.
Just completed the first part of the new assessment regime (paper-based tests only), so I though I'd give an overview of the new tests.
First off, the Group Bourdon and TRP are done back-to-back. As far as I am aware, these are unchanged from the previous assessment, so plenty of information on them can be found elsewhere. As I understand it from the research papers on the selection of the new tests, the computerised Group Bourdon is no longer used.
The second half of the day was for the new TEA-Occ (Test of Everyday Attention for Occupational Assessment), which is done in 3 parts back-to-back:
First is an exercise where you must count low tones, interspersed with high tones that you must ignore. This was the part I found the most difficult, especially as 'low' and 'high' are relative. You cannot make any tally marks, and counting on your fingers is not going to help you (the tones are too quick, and often count above 10). Remember: the first tone you hear is always a 'low' tone, so you always start by counting 'one'.
Second is a test where you have to search a faux Yellow Pages for symbol pairs. There is a lot of flim-flam about going on holiday and having to hire a plumber, but that is irrelevant to the task. You also have a 'symbol card' on which four symbol pairs are shown, but there are only four varieties of symbols on the answer sheet so this also is a bit of indirection. What the test boils down to is ignoring any text on the answer sheet, and circling any and all pairs of matching symbols. That's it, and you have 45 seconds.
Third, you do the same symbol matching task (with some new waffle about finding a restaurant, again irrelevant) but at the same time you must count sequences of tones. Unlike the first task the tones are all the same, so this is much easier. There are several answer boxes on the answer sheet but you do not necessarily fill them all (e.g. there may be 15 answer boxes but you may only be played 8 sequences of beeps), so you cannot rely on looking at how many boxes are left to fill as to how much time you have left. You have 60 seconds.
The invigilator understandably kept schtum on any marking criteria for any of the tests, but we were told that OPC would mark the exercises within a week and hand them to the TOC, who may take another week before contacting anyone.
Roughly how long was the test day in total, got mine at 12 30 tomorrow and don't know if we will be doing it in stages.
3 hrs
On a similar vein, does BVE and other simulators allow for wheel slip/slide conditions? Over the past few days it has been quite bad up here and the shows the skill the drivers have in stopping in such difficult conditions.
On a similar vein, does BVE and other simulators allow for wheel slip/slide conditions? Over the past few days it has been quite bad up here and the shows the skill the drivers have in stopping in such difficult conditions.
Even the training runs we do on the official simulators at work for low adhesion don't come close to the real thing. I think it's one of those things that can't really be fully simulated, even if you had a moving soundstage sort of thing I think you'd struggle to come close.
I'm pretty sure Microsoft train simulator (the original) supported low adhesion. Does anyone know if the latest one (2014) does too ?
Even the training runs we do on the official simulators at work for low adhesion don't come close to the real thing. I think it's one of those things that can't really be fully simulated, even if you had a moving soundstage sort of thing I think you'd struggle to come close.
trying to say that you understand the job of a train driver because you have built a detailed route on a game is rather silly.
If you take a single route on a train simulation game and get up at 3am 5 days in a row and spend 10hour of your day constantly driving up and down the same simulated route in the same traction on your own ....
I have tried simulators like BVE in the past and whilst they are very realistic in some ways they don't even begin to scratch the surface of the challenges if the job such as repetitiveness, boredom etc.
The second half of the day was for the new TEA-Occ (Test of Everyday Attention for Occupational Assessment), which is done in 3 parts back-to-back:
First is an exercise where you must count low tones, interspersed with high tones that you must ignore. This was the part I found the most difficult, especially as 'low' and 'high' are relative. You cannot make any tally marks, and counting on your fingers is not going to help you (the tones are too quick, and often count above 10). Remember: the first tone you hear is always a 'low' tone, so you always start by counting 'one'.
The beeps were about 2 per second IIRC, and as far as I could tell the speed was constant throughout. There was then an audible spoken prompt to write your answer, with a 1-2 second pause to write it, then the next "listen to be beeps" (or words to that effect) prompt.
Hi,
Does anyone know what the Driver Fault Finding Test (DFFT) is? It's not in the practice material they send out, but it's something London Midland will run.
Thanks
Thanks Edz, I will have to try listening to a TV program with a load of swearing in it. A bit faster than the lifts I have known. Probably used for astronaut training to become accustomed to weightlessness.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I knew I had seen this one earlier in the year on the Transpennine thread so I searched on Google. I was surprised to see that I asked the very same question as you in my very first post.
The reply I got from Flyboy contained the following link:
http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=70192&highlight=dfft
Well worth a read. The DFFT sounds like a glorified TRP part 2. I have yet to take this test.
I did it earlier this year, basically a set of information to cross reference as quickly as possible in order to report a fault on a train and carriage. Each question uses the same train and carriage, except obviously the information and dials, change. If you can follow a flow diagram quickly its not too hard, I did eleven and passed but some others did eight and also passed. Don't think it's as much of a whittling exercise as some of the others as two lads who got eight are now trainee driver's.
I did hear some people say one lad did all 20 but I don't believe that's possible.
It made my day reading that. I can do flow charts quite easily as I program computers on a daily basis. Probably the same kind of diagram that train drivers would consult when trying to localise an air leak, for example.