Given the fact that the 95TS is just now receiving a fairly substantial internal refresh, I imagine they're committing to using the stock for a fair while, and why not? I'm curious if the slightly older 96TS (yes it is that way round!) will receive the same treatment as in some of the units the interior is starting to look a bit dog-eared.
The 95TS and 96TS are now maintained by different companies, one is still Alstom and the other is now LU APD. Have a guess which way round it is...
Other than the traction package, are there any engineering differences between the 95TS and 96TS? And in that case, would a trailer vehicle be immediately compatible with both (Northern Line ATO reprogramming notwithstanding)?
Pretty extensive differences to be honest.
Theres about three years of design evolution, correcting a lot of the 'silly mistakes' that are still present on the 96TS. Such as the de-trainment ladder design, train management computer is slightly different, wiring is slightly different throughout the train, although that's not too hard to change.
Oh, and the cab layout is quite different.
96TS going to the Northern Line would be like how the Mk.1 72TS fits in on the Bakerloo, they'll probably never interwork like the 72TS though.