• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Overground line names progress?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dstock7080

Established Member
Joined
17 Feb 2010
Messages
3,513
Location
West London
As expected the official launch of the renaming has been delayed because of the recent cyber attack, all Staff need to attend one-on-one sessions to regain access to the internal systems.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

vuzzeho

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2022
Messages
665
Location
London
not one shred of evidence this is happening
Scroll up. Canada Water has uncovered signs of the new line names. TfL have just been through a devastating cyberattack. Maybe they want to get back on their feet before they launch projects like line renaming.
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
9,276
If Mildmay is pronounced as my paternal grandparents did, that is, 'Marmay', then there's no problem. Before they were married, they both lived a few hundred yards from Mildmay Park station (Hayling Road, Hawthorne Street), so I guess they knew how to pronounce it in the prescribed fashion.
If that is true it makes it an even more stupid choice of line name!
How would a tourist know they are listening for that when they read Mildmay?
 

Cross City

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2020
Messages
932
Location
Birmingham
If Mildmay is pronounced as my paternal grandparents did, that is, 'Marmay', then there's no problem. Before they were married, they both lived a few hundred yards from Mildmay Park station (Hayling Road, Hawthorne Street), so I guess they knew how to pronounce it in the prescribed fashion.

People love to moan about the creeping Americanisation of the English langue but I'd welcome it if it put a stop to nonsense like this type of pronunciation.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,380
Location
Cumbria, UK
I wish Crossrail was called Crossrail.
Where’s the like button when you want it? Crossrail describes the line but Elisabeth…. I know the Victoria line because it goes through Victoria and the Circle line because…..
 

Ghostbus

On Moderation
Joined
17 Sep 2024
Messages
331
Location
England
Mildmay is the clear outlier. It is perhaps the only example of a piece of British infrastructure being named after a charity that it has no formal connection to?

I wonder how a name that is, I presume, so little known even in London, came to be adopted over the alternatives. What say the minutes?
 

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
2,211
Location
Croydon
Mildmay is the clear outlier. It is perhaps the only example of a piece of British infrastructure being named after a charity that it has no formal connection to?
Also not even the nearest of the lines to Mildmay Hospital.

Lioness , Weaver and Liberty do have an attempt at a local connection , but it wasnt attempted with the others.
 

Cross City

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2020
Messages
932
Location
Birmingham
How do you know? And its a station (and not the biggest nor most touristy) rather than a line.

It's the only station I can think of that has a massive tourist advertising booth in it, pimping train tickets to Bicester Village for the hoards of Chinese and American tourists.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,380
Location
Cumbria, UK
This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,395
This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
Since when does TfL ask "what is the benefit to the country?" Had you said "benefit to London" l might have agreed.
 

Malaxa

Member
Joined
9 Mar 2022
Messages
167
Location
London
Also not even the nearest of the lines to Mildmay Hospital.

Lioness , Weaver and Liberty do have an attempt at a local connection , but it wasnt attempted with the others.
But [see comments above] the line does pass through the long since closed and demolished Mildmay Park station. Anyway, the whole point here was to link it to AIDS treatment...
I call it the Marmite line.
 

stuu

Established Member
Joined
2 Sep 2011
Messages
3,763
This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.

Helping people move about is a clear benefit
 

Wolfie

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2010
Messages
7,395
Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.

Helping people move about is a clear benefit
.... and indeed l believe a Johnson mayoral-era survey/consultation showed a clear public preference for individual line names.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,380
Location
Cumbria, UK
Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.

Helping people move about is a clear benefit
The lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.
 

JamesT

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2015
Messages
4,834
The lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.
Eh? They’re not renaming the existing Underground lines.
They’re giving line names to different parts of the Overground.
 
Joined
5 Jan 2014
Messages
566
The lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.
Those are not the lines being renamed. It's the generic Overground lines that are being given individual identifiers
 

Recessio

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2019
Messages
1,495
Location
London
This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
The benefit is that you don't have six completely disparate lines with the same names, one of which is completely isolated from the rest of the network.
 

themiller

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,380
Location
Cumbria, UK
Eh? They’re not renaming the existing Underground lines.
They’re giving line names to different parts of the Overground.
Oh. I picked that up wrongly. I thought that it was a push to assign new names to all of the TfL lines. Oops. I still don’t understand the need to name them. After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,950
Location
London
Oh. I picked that up wrongly. I thought that it was a push to assign new names to all of the TfL lines. Oops. I still don’t understand the need to name them. After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.

There was a much bigger discussion about this on these forums in February.

 

birchesgreen

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2015
Messages
7,653
Location
Solihull
If you see how the London Overground is now on the map you'll probably understand why they need to separate the lines. Its currently all one orange mess and can be misleading.
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,459
Location
Isle of Man
If you see how the London Overground is now on the map you'll probably understand why they need to separate the lines. Its currently all one orange mess and can be misleading.
Absolutely. The spider's web of orange desperately needs untangling.

I think people are complaining because of the names chosen. If they'd just gone for S1, S2, etc, it would have cost exactly the same.
 

Couru

Member
Joined
28 Feb 2023
Messages
66
Location
Basingstoke
If you see how the London Overground is now on the map you'll probably understand why they need to separate the lines. Its currently all one orange mess and can be misleading.
I'm sure it's been said, but seeing "Partial Closure" on the Overground and having to do quick geography to figure out whether its your line or one on the other side of the city was never fun.
 

harz99

Member
Joined
14 Jul 2009
Messages
913
The whole naming lines is a nonsense, it would have been far easier, cleaner and simpler to use Line 1, Line 2 etc. Easier to remember, easier to give tourists directions, no issues with mispronunciation, would clearly separate over ground routes from under ground routes, and so on...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top