Dstock7080
Established Member
As expected the official launch of the renaming has been delayed because of the recent cyber attack, all Staff need to attend one-on-one sessions to regain access to the internal systems.
How very yeasty....The thing about the Marmay pronunciation is, you either love it or hate it.
Scroll up. Canada Water has uncovered signs of the new line names. TfL have just been through a devastating cyberattack. Maybe they want to get back on their feet before they launch projects like line renaming.not one shred of evidence this is happening
If that is true it makes it an even more stupid choice of line name!If Mildmay is pronounced as my paternal grandparents did, that is, 'Marmay', then there's no problem. Before they were married, they both lived a few hundred yards from Mildmay Park station (Hayling Road, Hawthorne Street), so I guess they knew how to pronounce it in the prescribed fashion.
If Mildmay is pronounced as my paternal grandparents did, that is, 'Marmay', then there's no problem. Before they were married, they both lived a few hundred yards from Mildmay Park station (Hayling Road, Hawthorne Street), so I guess they knew how to pronounce it in the prescribed fashion.
I slightly mourn the Harlequin Line, but even the Watford shopping centre has lost the name now (all the ones that left Intu got their old name back except that one for some reason!)
Marylebone/Marlybun doesn’t seem to be a problem.How would a tourist know they are listening for that when they read Mildmay?
Where’s the like button when you want it? Crossrail describes the line but Elisabeth…. I know the Victoria line because it goes through Victoria and the Circle line because…..I wish Crossrail was called Crossrail.
Also not even the nearest of the lines to Mildmay Hospital.Mildmay is the clear outlier. It is perhaps the only example of a piece of British infrastructure being named after a charity that it has no formal connection to?
How do you know? And its a station (and not the biggest nor most touristy) rather than a line.Marylebone/Marlybun doesn’t seem to be a problem.
How do you know? And its a station (and not the biggest nor most touristy) rather than a line.
Since when does TfL ask "what is the benefit to the country?" Had you said "benefit to London" l might have agreed.This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
But [see comments above] the line does pass through the long since closed and demolished Mildmay Park station. Anyway, the whole point here was to link it to AIDS treatment...Also not even the nearest of the lines to Mildmay Hospital.
Lioness , Weaver and Liberty do have an attempt at a local connection , but it wasnt attempted with the others.
Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
.... and indeed l believe a Johnson mayoral-era survey/consultation showed a clear public preference for individual line names.Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.
Helping people move about is a clear benefit
The lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.Having individual names for each route is vastly more useful from a passenger information point of view. Much more useful than hearing "delays on London Overground", which could be anywhere. You can dislike the chosen names but it would have cost more or less the same to rebrand them 01,02, 03, or Tom, Dick and Harry or whatever.
Helping people move about is a clear benefit
Eh? They’re not renaming the existing Underground lines.The lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.
Those are not the lines being renamed. It's the generic Overground lines that are being given individual identifiersThe lines already have names - Bakerloo, Victoria, etc. Why change these names which already exist and what’ll be the cost to taxpayers? Don’t try the reason that people will recognise them easier because they’re well known to regular users and existing maps guide visitors.
The benefit is that you don't have six completely disparate lines with the same names, one of which is completely isolated from the rest of the network.This renaming of lines seems to me to be one (or more) person coming up with a ‘non-job’ in order to create their employment and so wages for a few months. Along their path to creating their own niche, they create confusion for the rest of us, all to influence their own financial and lifestyle advancement. The questions that should be asked are ‘Why?’ and ‘What is the overall benefit to the country?’.
Oh. I picked that up wrongly. I thought that it was a push to assign new names to all of the TfL lines. Oops. I still don’t understand the need to name them. After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.Eh? They’re not renaming the existing Underground lines.
They’re giving line names to different parts of the Overground.
Oh. I picked that up wrongly. I thought that it was a push to assign new names to all of the TfL lines. Oops. I still don’t understand the need to name them. After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.
After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.
A lot of that line had one of the oldest railway names in the world - The Stockton and Darlington Railway ("Line"?).After all, the line from Darlington to Middlesbrough isn’t named.
Absolutely. The spider's web of orange desperately needs untangling.If you see how the London Overground is now on the map you'll probably understand why they need to separate the lines. Its currently all one orange mess and can be misleading.
I'm sure it's been said, but seeing "Partial Closure" on the Overground and having to do quick geography to figure out whether its your line or one on the other side of the city was never fun.If you see how the London Overground is now on the map you'll probably understand why they need to separate the lines. Its currently all one orange mess and can be misleading.