• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New name for Blackfriars?

Status
Not open for further replies.

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
Nothing too major, but TRUK reports that in August NR carried out a four week consultation for the potential renaming of Blackfriars NR station.

Following consultation, the following options have been drawn up:

If no external funding for a complete name change is put forward:
London Blackfriars (for Bankside)
London Blackfriars (for South Bank & Bankside)
London Blackfriars (for Bankside & South Bank)
London Blackfriars (for South Bank)

However, if external money is donated:
London Blackfriars - Bankside
London Blackfriars Bridge
London Blackfriars - South Bank
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HST Power

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
3,704
London Blackfriars Bridge would be quite a mouthful for the Automated Announcements!
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
"London Blackfriars Bridge" sounds too awkward, and some half-wit will sooner or later confuse it with London Bridge - the next station for most trains from Blackfriars. Why can't they just keep the familiar name? If not, I think I would suggest dumping the word "London" and adding "(for the South Bank)". I would have said Victoria, for Queen Victoria Street, but something tells me that wouldn't work. What could that be? :lol:
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,094
Location
Redcar
Forgive me if the answer to this is obvious, but why does it need renaming?
 

alanf

Member
Joined
9 Jan 2010
Messages
129
Forgive me if the answer to this is obvious, but why does it need renaming?

Because the country is on it's backside and they can waste some public money (lots) lining some agencies pockets. I'm agree with what you've said

Alan
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
34,272
To reflect the new access opportunities when the new station opens apparently...

...although the main driving force is surely opportunist local politicians on the south side.

See also previous reports of some idiot who wanted Shoreditch HS renamed 'Banglatown' (or something like that) to help his share of the local vote...
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
...although the main driving force is surely opportunist local politicians on the south side.

See also previous reports of some idiot who wanted Shoreditch HS renamed 'Banglatown' (or something like that) to help his share of the local vote...

Indeed, the following people are for the renaming:
Simon Hughes, MP for Bermondsey & Old Southwark MP;
Caroline Pidgeon, London Assembly member;
Peter John, Southwark Council leader.

They believe such a move would 'benefit local residents and businesses and boost the number of visitors to the area and its attractions'.

I'll let you make up your own mind... ;)
 

Max

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
8 Jun 2005
Messages
5,468
Location
Cambridge
Complete waste of money. Yes, it's for the South Bank, but it's still for the north bank too (is it not?). :roll:
 

Eagle

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2011
Messages
7,106
Location
Leamingrad / Blanfrancisco
London King's Cross (for St Pancras International)

London Marylebone (for Baker Street)

London Waterloo (for the Merlin Entertainments London Eye®)
 

wintonian

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2010
Messages
4,889
Location
Hampshire
Complete waste of money. Yes, it's for the South Bank, but it's still for the north bank too (is it not?). :roll:

London Blackfriars (for Bank) then? That wouldn't confuse anyone would it?

Sent from my HTC Desire S
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
Just remove the London and call it Blackfriars, job done!
 

table38

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
1,812
Location
Stalybridge
Isn't the form usually to charge £50,000 to just change the font and add a few wavy lines or go-faster stripes? How about:

blackfriars.jpg
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
And of course the use of "Bridge" after Blackfriars to appease the idealists and confuse the average nobody ;)

London Blackfriars Bruidge Thames Link Thameslink for the South Bank, North Bank, and City Thameslink Station Parkway
 
Joined
2 May 2011
Messages
287
Location
Nowhere
Good calls everyone - genuinely made me laugh.

I only wish the crapulous politicians and local authority bigwigs really recognised how pathetic the whole exercise is. But my best guess is they are too full of their own self-importance to even consider why the general public would be reluctant to see any money (public or private) wasted on this farce.

London Bridge is being redeveloped. What next? London Bridge Shard Pointy Thing More London Borough Market.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
35,424
Location
A typical commuter-belt part of north-west England
Complete waste of money. Yes, it's for the South Bank, but it's still for the North Bank too (is it not?). :roll:

I completely agree with you on all points. Blackfriars station has its historical link with the London Chatham and Dover Railway (when it was known at St Paul's) and it received its current name in 1937 which is the name that most people now associate it with. It has over 12 million users in the station entry/exit statistics. I am from Cheshire East, but if Blackfriars is mentioned in railway parlance, I know exactly what is being discussed...and where.
 

Bedpan

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
1,299
Location
Harpenden
Oddly, in the survey they didn't give Blackfriars or London Blackfriars as an option!! I still told them to keep the name as it is, and I hope everybody else took part and told them the same thing. I wonder though if these surveys are a bit like the BBC competitions were before they stoped them. Wasn't the original Blackfriars station on the south side of the river anyway?

If they got the funding and called it London Blackfriars - South Bank or any of the other alternatives, it gives the impression that its nowhere near Blackfriars underground. So it would have to be London Blackfriars - South Bank (for Blackfriars).

They'd be far better renaming City Thameslink to something more appropriate like Ludgate Hill , or St Pauls Thameslink (ironic sigh).
 

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,317
How about London Emirates Station, then we could get corporate sponsorship!
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,414
Location
LBK
See also previous reports of some idiot who wanted Shoreditch HS renamed 'Banglatown' (or something like that) to help his share of the local vote...

It was an Asian councilor who wanted to name it "Brick Lane" - which is right next to the station and is a haven for curry enthusiasts.
 

stut

Established Member
Joined
25 Jun 2008
Messages
1,924
Naive question, I'm sure, but does this kind of thing really need a "consultation exercise"? Just call it "Blackfriars" or "Blackfriars & Bankside" and stop wasting money.

It's like the Cambridge island platform, which apparently "involved extensive consultation processes" to ensure that it was accessible to cyclists. The preferred option - to put in a groove at the edge of the steps (as per pretty much every German or Dutch station). I suspect this cost substantially less than the exercise itself (and common sense would say that it's an easy way to allow cycle access).
 

Greenback

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
9 Aug 2009
Messages
15,268
Location
Llanelli
They don't need to change the name. They don't need to do a consultation. They don't need to spend any money at all on it.

When we have regions of the UK that are begging for additional stock and new trains, why is any public money at all being spent on this and that stupid cable car over the Thames?

Despite all the laughs in this thread, I really do despair.
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
Sorry for yet another bump today, but the chosen name is 'Blackfriars for Bankside and South Bank'. It will be displayed on the station's nameboards when it fully reopnes. Enjoy :D
 

Old Timer

Established Member
Joined
24 Aug 2009
Messages
3,702
Location
On a plane somewhere at 35,000
Network Rail have this passion to destroy historical names and associations, hence the purge of Junctions and line names that have been around since the start of the Railway during resignalling schemes.

For example the Birmingham lines at Nuneaton, which have been known by that name since opening have had to be renamed the "Arley lines" for no seemingly good reason, likewise the "Leicester" lines became the Hinkley lines. :roll: :roll:

It is just a shame that Network Rail fails to discharge its primary function which is to run an effective and efficient railways infrastructure, and I think most people in the know would prefer a return to proper operational standards rather than pointless and uneccessary diversions along other avenues.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top