• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

New Cities

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheEdge

Established Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
4,498
Location
Norwich
Hopefully Stanley down in the Falklands, mainly because it'll just annoy the Argentinians
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
Why I don't see why it is a strong case.
It's just a Northern town with a big railway station
Major regional hub, population over 110,000 rising to 160,000 in the urban area, it has a Minster, historic listed buildings like the Mansion House, market charter status from medieval times, regeneration in recent years particularly around Sir Nigel Gresley Square, an art gallery and museums and theatres, and - of course - solid transport links. Also it was once home to a 43 year-old goldfish! You're being very dismissive.

(Though I understand why you, of all, would support Reading's case over it... ;))
 

D6130

Established Member
Joined
12 Jan 2021
Messages
8,928
Location
West Yorkshire/Tuscany
Why I don't see why it is a strong case.
It's just a Northern town with a big railway station
It's a large Northern town with a significant population, not only in the town itself, but also in its extensive suburbs and satellite towns and villages....plus, it has a magnificent gothic Minster. I would say that it would be a worthy contender for city status.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,284
Location
Glasgow
In Scotland, St Andrews feels the most like a 'traditional' city so I reckon it's fairly possible. Dunfermline could also be in with a shout; I've mentioned it before as being perhaps the most natural candidate for Scotland's eighth city; large population and size (top 10 in Scotland and growing too), decent regional importance, and quite a bit of history behind it what with the abbey and palace. Either way, I feel like Fife may well gain a city.
Elgin is another one that was once claimed to be a city, although long ago.
Elgin was a city; Elgin and Perth both had city status removed in the 1970s as part of the reforms of Scottish local government.

Perth of course had its status restored in 2012, meanwhile road signs in the city continued to refer to the 'City Centre', ie the fair people of the Fair City basically said - 'we are still a "city" even if the government says we aren't'!
 

NorthOxonian

Established Member
Associate Staff
Buses & Coaches
Joined
5 Jul 2018
Messages
1,667
Location
Oxford/Newcastle
Perth of course had its status restored in 2012, meanwhile road signs in the city continued to refer to the 'City Centre', ie the fair people of the Fair City basically said - 'we are still a "city" even if the government says we aren't'!
This also happens in Dunfermline - at least one road sign there says "city centre" (on the roundabout just east of the town centre).
 

SargeNpton

Established Member
Joined
19 Nov 2018
Messages
1,704
This also happens in Dunfermline - at least one road sign there says "city centre" (on the roundabout just east of the town centre).
On the other hand, there are plenty of signs in Milton Keynes that refer to it as a city - even though it has never been.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,284
Location
Glasgow
This also happens in Dunfermline - at least one road sign there says "city centre" (on the roundabout just east of the town centre).
Dunfermline was certainly, as with Brechin, a Royal Burgh but I don't believe ever accorded City Status. The rights and privileges of Royal Burghs in Scotland was abolished in 1975.

The Act of Union in 1707 expressly guaranteed the preservation of Royal Burghs alomg with their rights and privileges - at that point there were 70(!) such Royal Burghs.
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
This also happens in Dunfermline - at least one road sign there says "city centre" (on the roundabout just east of the town centre).
If Dunfermline wins, would its westernmost rail station become Dunfermline City? :D

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Elgin was a city; Elgin and Perth both had city status removed in the 1970s as part of the reforms of Scottish local government.

Perth of course had its status restored in 2012, meanwhile road signs in the city continued to refer to the 'City Centre', ie the fair people of the Fair City basically said - 'we are still a "city" even if the government says we aren't'!
It's quite odd to think of Elgin being a city but Inverness not being one!
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,284
Location
Glasgow
If Dunfermline wins, would its westernmost rail station become Dunfermline City? :D
Why not Dunfermline Citadel? Sounds much more impressive ;)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

It's quite odd to think of Elgin being a city but Inverness not being one!
Indeed, especially given that Inverness has a cathedral just as Elgin does.

And Inverness was a Royal Burgh.
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
Why not Dunfermline Citadel? Sounds much more impressive ;)

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Indeed, especially given that Inverness has a cathedral just as Elgin does.

And Inverness was a Royal Burgh.
Dunfermline Paragon? Dunfermline Temple Meads? :lol:

I do like Citadel though. And yes, Inverness not being a city for much of history is slightly surprising to me, to be honest. I mean, Brechin was one!
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,406
Location
UK
Major regional hub, population over 110,000 rising to 160,000 in the urban area, it has a Minster, historic listed buildings like the Mansion House, market charter status from medieval times, regeneration in recent years particularly around Sir Nigel Gresley Square, an art gallery and museums and theatres, and - of course - solid transport links. Also it was once home to a 43 year-old goldfish! You're being very dismissive.

(Though I understand why you, of all, would support Reading's case over it... ;))

Reading is double the size. The official figure is 160,000 for Reading Borough Council. But some of Reading is covered by Wokingham Borough Council (like Earley which is arguably Reading)

It is also a large employment centre, with many large companies such as 3, Microsoft and Pepsi having their European offices in Reading.

So it has a much stronger case than Doncaster
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,008
Location
St Albans
By the definition in use here, Greater London is not a city.
Applying the population criterion that some propose here would mean that every one of the 33 boroughs would easily be a city, with the sole exception of one, - the City of London which is already a city but only had a population of 10,938 in 2020. 23 of the 33 have populations of over 1/4 million. That is greater than Wolverhampton, Derby, Swansea, Aberdeen, Southampton and Gateshead.
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,826
Location
Dundee
Have we not mentioned South Ayrshire as an area applying to become a city? That seems a bizarre one to me.
 

Ediswan

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2012
Messages
3,415
Location
Stevenage
Applying the population criterion that some propose here would mean that every one of the 33 boroughs would easily be a city, with the sole exception of one, - the City of London which is already a city but only had a population of 10,938 in 2020. 23 of the 33 have populations of over 1/4 million. That is greater than Wolverhampton, Derby, Swansea, Aberdeen, Southampton and Gateshead.
No need for the exception, the City of London is not a borough.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,284
Location
Glasgow
Ah, silly me. Cheers :) I guess it just calls itself a city.
Plenty of places do - I think for the 'prestige' factor. Not saying they are wrong to do so; I mean if Brechin applied for City Status I think it would be quite reasonable for it to do if it so wished.

Until the 1980s if people in Inverness and hinterland wanted Marks and Spencers the nearest one was in Elgin!
Seems preposterous now, but I guess the business economics determined that Elgin was more worthy of a branch? Or was that Marks just being snobbish and only having a store in a city (presuming the Elgin branch opened when Elgin was still a city).
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,181
Location
LBK
Milton Keynes followed by Middlesbrough.

No other discussion required.
Yes, plus there are likely to be three other candidates from the other nations. St Andrew's, perhaps, Wrexham is a shoe-in, and I fancy Coleraine as an outsider in NI.
 

philosopher

Established Member
Joined
23 Sep 2015
Messages
1,513
Milton Keynes followed by Middlesbrough.

No other discussion required.
Of those on the list I have visited, Reading and Milton Keynes feel most like cities. However due to the Government’s levelling agenda, my guess would be either Middlesborough or Doncaster.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
16,008
Location
St Albans
Of those on the list I have visited, Reading and Milton Keynes feel most like cities. However due to the Government’s levelling agenda, my guess would be either Middlesborough or Doncaster.
Whichever is the ex red wall constituency that they want to bribe to vote their way next time.
 

317 forever

Established Member
Joined
21 Aug 2010
Messages
3,260
Location
North West
Bournemouth is interesting because of how it is part of one big area with only way to tell you have entered a different town by the road signs, a bit like the greater London area.
Bournemouth & Poole could become 1 city, a bit like Brighton & Hove is treated like one.

Mind you, it would lead to Poole gaining the word Actually to supplement it.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
12,940
Location
Up the creek
Bournemouth & Poole could become 1 city, a bit like Brighton & Hove is treated like one.

Mind you, it would lead to Poole gaining the word Actually to supplement it.
Well, one of the main ‘big city’ pointers is a proper orchestra and the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra definitely comes into this category. However, it is based in Poole nowadays.
 

backontrack

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2014
Messages
6,399
Location
The UK
Reading is double the size. The official figure is 160,000 for Reading Borough Council. But some of Reading is covered by Wokingham Borough Council (like Earley which is arguably Reading)

It is also a large employment centre, with many large companies such as 3, Microsoft and Pepsi having their European offices in Reading.

So it has a much stronger case than Doncaster
Still doesn't pass the smell test to call Doncaster 'just a Northern provincial town'! It's derisory.

I suppose Canterbury shouldn't be a city when nearby Ashford is bigger and also an employment centre?
 

PTR 444

Established Member
Joined
22 Aug 2019
Messages
2,647
Location
Wimborne
Well, one of the main ‘big city’ pointers is a proper orchestra and the Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra definitely comes into this category. However, it is based in Poole nowadays.
Also worth mentioning that Bournemouth’s one and only university is actually located in Poole.

I think there was a proposal about a decade ago to name the BCP conurbation as “City of Poole Bay”
 

Busaholic

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Jun 2014
Messages
14,671
Marazion would be an interesting choice. Its station closed in 1964, although the main Great Western line still passes through. Its one chip shop closes in autumn and winter. Two double decker buses passing can lead to a stand-off. The only people to benefit would be the National Trust and the St Aubyn family of St Michael's Mount fame.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top