I'm not angry with NR staff or the Union, and I don't think very many are. My solidarity it to anyone who wishes to stand up to their employers to keep their terms and to fight for a fair pay deal.Who knew that the key to the deal was offering 5 days carers leave , re-jigging the long service deals and ,crucially, giving us the 4% for an extra 3 months ? Yes comrades, these are what your solidarity and strength have won.
Please, spare me the BS. The deal was the same (baring the above) in November when the RMT endorsed a reject vote.
What the union HAS achieved is the weakening of its strength going forward,so this is,at best, a pyrrhic victory. For example :
1) Why say at the outset that not one dispute is settled until all disputes are settled ? NR staff cannot take action on behalf of TOC staff, it is called secondary action and it is ILLEGAL. Sorry to break it to TOC members, but this was always the case. The people you should be angry with are,not NR members, but the hierarchy of the RMT who peddled this myth.
2) As others have pointed out , the RMT has lost members (eligible to vote on 24/05/22 was 21,070. Today's figure is 18,302). A difference of 2,768 ... 13℅ gone ...in less than a year ! Well done. Maggie would be proud.
3) Don't be surprised, if the Signallers want to breakaway from the current collective bargaining procedures. This dispute has been an eye opener for everyone (what about a new union for Mobile Operations Managers And Signalling Staff of MOMsASS)
Whether NR really feel this deal is acceptable rather than a foregone conclusion given the current consultation process, you'd have to ask them. But it's nothing to do with TOC dispute either way.