• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Network rail CP4 spending

Status
Not open for further replies.

Metroland

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2005
Messages
3,212
Location
Midlands
Enhancements as follows, committed spending:

National Stations Improvement Programme

NSIP is a joint industry initiative aiming to deliver station improvements to a minimum of 150 medium sized stations.

Intercity Express Programme

IEP outputs include infrastructure ready to accept the operation of the Intercity Express trains being procured under a train service provision contract by the DfT.

The scope includes power, platform and gauge works on the East Coast and Great Western Main Line routes.

Strategic Freight Network

The objective of this fund is to enhance the network used by freight trains and reduce conflict between freight and passenger traffic. This programme will deliver improved capacity between Ipswich and Peterborough; improved gauge clearance between Southampton and Basingstoke; further operation of freight trains south of London; and a variety of infill gauge and train lengthening schemes on the network.

Performance Fund

The objective of the fund is to facilitate performance improvement to deliver the performance targets for PPM and Cancellations and Significant Lateness (CaSL). The fund relates to the achievement of the regulatory outputs for England and Wales.

Seven day railway

The purpose of this fund is to provide incremental investment and operating expenditure so that we can make progress towards delivering a seven day railway.

King’s Cross

The primary objective of the King’s Cross project is to provide station capacity to handle passengers at peak times by providing a new western concourse containing a mezzanine level to provide retail and leisure facilities. The existing south concourse will be demolished and the southern square area will be reinstated. A new 12-car platform will be provided within the main trainshed.

Thameslink Programme

The Thameslink Programme will be delivered in three phases. The first of these (Key Output 0) allows for the current levels of train service to run consistently throughout the Thameslink Programme construction periods. The second phase (Key Output 1) provides an improved train service capacity of up to 16 train paths per hour in each direction between St Pancras International (Low Level) and Blackfriars stations and to allow up to 12-car train length operation between Bedford and Brighton by December 2011.

The key work packages required to deliver this output include major works at Blackfriars and Farringdon stations, signalling, telecoms, electrification and plant, and permanent way works in the core area; and platform extensions, power upgrade works, route clearance works and some stabling facilities in the outer area.

The final phase (Key Output 2) provides for the completed Thameslink service of up to 24 train paths per hour in each direction between St Pancras International and Blackfriars stations by December 2015. It will also provide new journey opportunities for example between places like Cambridge and Gatwick Airport.

The key work packages required to deliver this output are reconstruction of London Bridge, construction of a new twin-track viaduct at Borough, junction remodelling at Bermondsey and Tanners Hill, a new signalling control centre and further platform extensions, power upgrade works, route clearance works and some stabling facilities in the outer area.

Birmingham New Street Gateway Project

The delivery of the Gateway project is being funded in partnership with Advantage West Midlands, Birmingham City Council and Centro. The project will improve passenger capacity and facilities at the station and provide better access into and through the station.

Crossrail and Reading

The output of this programme is to deliver the scope specified for the Crossrail ‘on-network works’ and the Reading redevelopment project. Although Crossrail is not funded through the periodic review, subject to agreement about funding we propose to manage delivery in conjunction with the Reading project and deliver these projects by an integrated delivery team.

The Crossrail project is jointly sponsored by DfT and Transport for London and is being developed by Crossrail Limited.

The new Crossrail Act 2008 gives authority for the railway to be built. Crossrail aims to provide 24 trains per hour through 23 kilometres of new subsurface railway infrastructure under central London, continuing outwards to the east and west over 76 kilometres of some of the most congested and complex rail infrastructure in the UK. The project is targeting completion in 2017.

Train lengthening – southern

This programme is targeted at allowing the operation of longer trains on key routes within the south east of England.

The programme of enhancements within this package, in combination with the Thameslink Programme described earlier, will enable the relevant train operating companies to strengthen and lengthen services in the peak hours to deliver the increased passenger capacity into Fenchurch Street, Liverpool Street, Waterloo, London Bridge and Victoria.

Power supply upgrade

This package consists of a number of power supply upgrade projects in the south east which are necessary to support the ‘train lengthening – southern’ programme. It also encompasses the regenerative braking power project.

Southern capacity

This programme will provide the necessary passenger capacity at Gatwick airport, East Croydon and Seven Sisters stations as well as improving the operational robustness at Gatwick Airport.

ECML improvements

East Coast Main Line improvements package consists of projects specified by ORR as required to deliver the passenger kilometre specification on Strategic Route 8 and London capacity specification.

It also contains projects necessary to facilitate the operational plans.

The schemes specified by ORR are:

• capacity relief to the ECML joint line;
• Peterborough station area capacity enhancements;
• Alexandra Palace to Finsbury Park third up line;
• Finsbury Park to Alexandra Palace third down line improvements;
• ECML level crossings;
• Hitchin grade separation;
• York Holgate junction fourth line; and
• Shaftholme junction remodelling.

For many of the above schemes the delivery date is towards the end of the control period. We are currently reviewing the overall programme of ECML projects over the control period.

In addition improvements on the Moorgate branch and First Capital Connect train lengthening schemes are necessary to support the operational plans.

Western improvements programme

The schemes defined by ORR to be delivered are:

• Barry – Cardiff Queen Street corridor;
• Cotswold line redoubling; and
• Westerleigh Junction to Barnt Green linespeed improvement.

In addition the Maidenhead and Twyford relief line platform extensions project is necessary to support the operational plans.

WCML committed schemes

This package contains the schemes required to continue to enhance the capacity on the West Coast Main Line including Bletchley remodelling, power supply upgrade and Stafford/Colwich remodelling.

Midlands improvements programme

The schemes defined by ORR to be delivered are:

• Bromsgrove electrification;
• Redditch branch enhancement; and
• linespeed improvements on the

Wrexham to London Marylebone route. In addition train lengthening schemes on Strategic Routes 16, 17 and 19 are necessary to support the operational plans.

Northern urban centres – Yorkshire

This will deliver the infrastructure necessary to support the operational plans in the Yorkshire area. It contains a number of infrastructure enhancements including additional platforms, turnback facilities and stabling in order to do this.

Northern urban centres – Manchester

This will deliver the infrastructure necessary to support the operational plans in the Manchester area. It consists of a programme of train lengthening and stabling with redevelopment of Salford Crescent station and a number of small, value for money, capacity projects.

Airdrie – Bathgate

Airdrie – Bathgate will provide an electrified railway between Airdrie and Bathgate, capable of operating a minimum of four passenger trains per hour. In order to achieve this there is a wide programme of infrastructure works including new track, electrification, stations, platforms at existing stations and car parking facilities.

Glasgow Airport Rail Link

The GARL project will provide infrastructure to support a direct rail service with a 15-minute frequency between Glasgow Central and Glasgow Airport stations with a stop at Paisley Gilmour Street. The works includes the Paisley corridor renewals as well as works to transfer signalling control to the new West of Scotland signalling centre. In addition a third running line on the Paisley corridor and additional platform capacity at Glasgow Central will be provided.

Borders Railway

The Borders Railway comprises a new railway line connecting Midlothian and Scottish Borders Local Authority areas to central Edinburgh and the national rail network. The Network Rail output is to provide asset protection to the existing network during the project. The precise scope of work required from Network Rail is still subject to discussion with Transport Scotland and the funding provided through the review will be applied to the final scope.

Glasgow to Kilmarnock

The Glasgow to Kilmarnock project will provide a twin tracked section of railway between Lugton and south of Stewarton capable of supporting operation of half hourly passenger services between Kilmarnock and Glasgow.

Scotland: Tier 3 Development Fund

The fund is primarily aimed at initial development for future schemes that will enhance the network in Scotland and will contribute to the Scottish Government’s target of promoting sustainable economic growth.

Edinburgh to Glasgow improvements

The Edinburgh to Glasgow Improvements Programme will provide a significant upgrade to central Scotland’s transport links through the delivery of improved rail connections between Edinburgh and Glasgow, providing faster and more frequent services. The potential scope includes:

• an electrified railway between Edinburgh and Glasgow Queen Street (including diversion routes), the line via Cumbernauld and lines to Dunblane and Alloa;
• a new station at Gogar to serve Edinburgh Airport (via the tram) and a new curve at Dalmeny to allow Edinburgh to Glasgow services to access the new station;
• six trains per hour between Edinburgh and Queen Street with the fastest journey time of around 35 minutes and a mixture of stopping patterns to serve intermediate stations; and
• three trains per hour between Edinburgh and Glasgow Central (one stopping service and two semi-fast services) serving both the Shotts and Carstairs routes.

Other schemes in Scotland

Transport Scotland published the Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR) in December 2008 considering options for improvement to the transport infrastructure in Scotland beyond 2012.

The proposals include 11 major packages of work targeted at improvements in rail infrastructure. Network Rail and Transport Scotland will continue to work together to develop these options to increase capacity and improve capability on the network. The Scotland project development fund will be available in CP4 to begin the initial development of these projects.

Current growth predictions suggest that platform extensions will also be required to permit longer trains to operate in Ayrshire. Glasgow to Ayr and Largs lines will have the platforms extended to seven-car length with a passive provision for eight-car using selective door opening technology. The Inverclyde route will also benefit from extended platforms to facilitate the introduction of the new rolling stock with selective door opening technology to facilitate seven-car trains.

Options for delivering these extensions were included in the Scotland RUS and are being progressed.

On the Highlands route additional infrastructure may be required to facilitate increased line capacity and reduced journey time between Aberdeen and Inverness. In addition, the RUS included the option to enhance the infrastructure between Perth and Inverness to permit an increased frequency and reduced journey time. Network Rail has now been commissioned by Transport Scotland to develop this proposal further. It is primarily focused on journey time reductions and frequency improvements through linespeed enhancements and redoubling of sections of track.

London 2012 Olympics

There are a number of projects falling into a programme of works being delivered for the Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA).

They are designed to enhance the railway infrastructure in order to accommodate the demand forecast during the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic games and beyond. Schemes included in the ODA sponsored works are:

• Angel Lane freight loop;
• Stratford Regional Station upgrade – an enhancement to Stratford station encompassing platform widening, reopening a derelict subway, constructing additional lifts and stairs to aid passenger circulation around the station and a variety of power and telecoms enhancements;
• additional London Underground Central line platform at Stratford
station; and
• Gospel Oak to Barking capacity enhancements.

Airtrack

The Airtrack project is in development, currently sponsored by BAA. The scheme aims to provide two trains per hour from Reading, Waterloo and Guildford to Heathrow Terminal 5 (T5) via a new section of railway from Staines to the airport. In addition, BAA is keen to provide a two trains per hour shuttle service between T5 and a new bay platform at Staines by extending the Heathrow Express service south from the airport. We are developing the timetable, signalling and power design plus the onnetwork rail infrastructure.

Infrastructure specified for the project includes a new chord and a new bay platform at Staines and about four kilometres of new track from a junction off the Windsor line just north of Staines through to the new station at T5 where two platforms are to be fitted out for Airtrack services. In addition, the scheme will benefit from a new Platform 4c at Reading to be funded and provided as part of the Reading station redevelopment project, and also from capacity improvements planned at Waterloo station as part of the project to bring the disused International Terminal platforms into use for domestic services.

Evergreen 3

This is a proposed link at Bicester to connect the London Marylebone – Birmingham Snow Hill line with the route between Oxford and Bicester Town.

This project is third party funded and delivered but will become a Network Rail asset on completion.

Transport Innovation Fund

The Transport Innovation Fund (TIF) was announced in the DfT’s 2004 White
Paper ‘The Future of Transport’. Projects being funded through TIF in CP4 are the Southampton to West Coast Main Line W10 project; Peterborough to Nuneaton W10 project; Chat Moss gauge enhancement and four tracking in the Camden Road area to benefit freight.

Peterborough to Nuneaton W10 project

This project involves gauge clearance of the route from Peterborough to Nuneaton to W10 gauge. There will be the provision of a grade separated link at Nuneaton for trains from the Leicester direction to the Trent Valley line. The project will also provide capacity enhancements in the Bury St. Edmunds – Kennett area to enable up to eight intermodal trains per day in each direction, in addition to other traffic types. There are already some
intermodal services on this route and those are within the target of eight trains per day figure. Commissioning is due to take place at the end of 2011.

Southampton to West Coast Main Line W10 project

This scheme will provide a W10 gauge cleared route from Southampton to
Nuneaton and Birmingham. It is due to complete mid 2011. The project will include work on approximately 50 separate structures including tunnels, overbridges and stations.

Chat Moss gauge enhancement

The gauge enhancement scheme will increase gauge to W10 on the Chat Moss route to Edgehill and Earlestown route. It is part of the Olive Mount Chord scheme and should be complete in 2009/10.

Four tracking in the Camden Road area

This project would give four running lines between Camden Road east and west junctions. The principal benefit is intended to be for freight movements. In particular the enhancement may be expected to provide one additional eastbound freight path per hour.

The robustness of the route in times of disruption will also be improved.

Signalling

Overall activity in CP4 is broadly consistent with current levels, with annual expenditure of around £450 million throughout the control period.

The plan is dominated by conventional (non-ERTMS) resignalling work. In terms of the number of signalling equivalent units (SEUs) commissioned, the key projects in CP4 include:

• Cardiff area signalling renewal (652 SEUs);
• Water Orton Corridor resignalling (403 SEUs);
• Newport area signalling renewal phase 1 (377 SEUs);
• East Kent resignalling phase 1 (289 SEUs);
• South Erewash resignalling (274 SEUs); and
• Reading station signalling enabling works (227 SEUs).

http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse...Delivery Plan/2009/CP4 Delivery Plan 2009.pdf

http://www.transportbriefing.co.uk/story.php?id=5759
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,604
I seem to recall reading a similar list to this in draft form some months back. But theres one difference. In this new version, the redoubling of the Weston-super-Mare loop has been ditched!
bastards....
 

Royston Vasey

Established Member
Joined
14 May 2008
Messages
2,994
Location
Cambridge
I can't remember any time in my lifetime when such a wide-ranging programme of investment in the rail industry has been on the table. I'm sure not all of this will happen by 2014, but it's a frankly dizzying list and if even half of it is completed this will be some achievement. If this country is going to spend itself out of recession, it should do it by concerted targetted public spending on capital projects like this. Well done Network Rail and, dare I say, the DfT...
 

PhilipW

Member
Joined
6 Feb 2008
Messages
761
Location
Fareham, Hants
Hiiden away in the document is a small scheme that I had not heard of before - namely the 25kv overhead electrification of the Guide Bridge to Stalybridge line.

With this in place the Stalybridge to Manchester Piccadilly trains will take over the suburban stops from Guide Bridge so allowing the Hadfield and Glossop trains to run non-stop from Guide Bridge to Piccadilly.

I had not heard of this before, but it is seem like a good idea.
 

Pumbaa

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2008
Messages
5,022
Good plans. It's great to see something so promising and *committed to* but we shall have to see!
 

asylumxl

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2009
Messages
4,260
Location
Hiding in your shadow
King’s Cross

The primary objective of the King’s Cross project is to provide station capacity to handle passengers at peak times by providing a new western concourse containing a mezzanine level to provide retail and leisure facilities. The existing south concourse will be demolished and the southern square area will be reinstated. A new 12-car platform will be provided within the main trainshed.

Oh great. Hopefully not enough St Pancras. 1/5th station, 4/5ths mall.
 

will1337

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2008
Messages
613
Location
Laaandaaan
Enhancements as follows, committed spending:
Airtrack
In addition, BAA is keen to provide a two trains per hour shuttle service between T5 and a new bay platform at Staines by extending the Heathrow Express service south from the airport.

I'm not sure how that's going to work as the line would have to be 3rd rail in order to connect to the Waterloo - Reading line so how would HEX 332s get down it? Unless it were to be 25kV OHLE but that'd require some 450s getting pantographs fitted and some changes to diagrams. Otherwise diesels would have to be found from somewhere or new built and run along an electrified route apart from the last few miles which would be pretty wasteful.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,052
Location
Reston City Centre
King’s Cross

The primary objective of the King’s Cross project is to provide station capacity to handle passengers at peak times by providing a new western concourse containing a mezzanine level to provide retail and leisure facilities. The existing south concourse will be demolished and the southern square area will be reinstated. A new 12-car platform will be provided within the main trainshed.

Thameslink Programme

The Thameslink Programme ... will also provide new journey opportunities for example between places like Cambridge and Gatwick Airport

Obviously I'm in favour of any improvements to the network.

However, are all of the Kings Cross capacity enhancements necessary (since the FCC services to Peterborough & Cambridge will be moving to Thameslink, thus freeing up a number of platforms each hour at the Cross)?

Also, seems a shame that they're extending the train shed to twelve cars capacity whilst NXEC, HT, GC and GU are all wanting to run five coach trains :roll: Shame these can't be doubled up...
 

Phoenix

Established Member
Joined
11 Mar 2008
Messages
2,019
Location
birmingham
Well as for my little patch Water Orton the changes seem rather fruitfull with the resignaling which these days is much needed.
 

whoshotjimmi

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
340
Location
Drighlington, West Yorkshire
That all sounds good. Hopefully it will all be completed on time and on budget and not give people an opportunity for a moan.

From my perspective, it is good to see the North getting a mention. Salford Crescent especially is good news as it is about time someone grabbed it by the neck and gave it a good wringing. Obviously, I will be more happy when the full plans become public regarding the Yorkshire/Manchester corridor.

With regards to Kings Cross, it makes perfect sense to redevelop it - especially with the world class facility next door. The current station is beyond stupid - overcrowded, cramped and generally just a dismal place to wait for a train. Improvements here coupled with capacity increase on the ECML should lead to a much better product for everyone.

I only have one issue - that of the seven day railway. I would say that only a small amount of the country has any requirement for this - London primarily. Demand in most areas I would have thought is very small. I think the money for such a scheme would be better concentrated where it has more benefit.
 

Danielo

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2009
Messages
136
Location
Harrow and Wealdstone
With regards to Kings Cross, it makes perfect sense to redevelop it - especially with the world class facility next door. The current station is beyond stupid - overcrowded, cramped and generally just a dismal place to wait for a train. Improvements here coupled with capacity increase on the ECML should lead to a much better product for everyone.

Totally agree. I hope they do a good job of sprucing it up. I'd like to have seen Euston up for redevelopment as well, but I think Kings Cross is more pressing.
 

daccer

Member
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Messages
373
what did happen to the euston redevelopment? I see some small improvements are going in but will there be no major rebuild such as at Kings Cross. I could have sworn I have seen an artists impression of the new look Euston somewhere!
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,052
Location
Reston City Centre
With regards to Kings Cross, it makes perfect sense to redevelop it - especially with the world class facility next door. The current station is beyond stupid - overcrowded, cramped and generally just a dismal place to wait for a train. Improvements here coupled with capacity increase on the ECML should lead to a much better product for everyone

With the two FCC services to Peterborough, and two FCC services to Cambridge moving from Kings Cross to the Thameslink tunnel, that means Kings Cross losing around a third of it's hourly departures, which should give a bit more platform space.

I know this is a few years away, but then so is any improvement to KX capacity.

(I'm not sure whether the half hourly "fast" Cambridge services, including the one to Kings Lynn will be part of Thameslink or not, longer term)
 

whoshotjimmi

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
340
Location
Drighlington, West Yorkshire
With the two FCC services to Peterborough, and two FCC services to Cambridge moving from Kings Cross to the Thameslink tunnel, that means Kings Cross losing around a third of it's hourly departures, which should give a bit more platform space.

I know this is a few years away, but then so is any improvement to KX capacity.

(I'm not sure whether the half hourly "fast" Cambridge services, including the one to Kings Lynn will be part of Thameslink or not, longer term)

I use the term capacity with regard to the general improvements to the ECML outlined as opposed to just Kings Cross. My point is, that after all the improvements coined, the service should be much better.

I can't help feeling that a trick was missed with Kings Cross. The area around KX and St Pancras was in complete turmoil as all the improvements were made and I think that, surely, giving KX a bit of a kick at the same time would have made sense, especially in a planning capacity. But that seems to be the way with our rail infrastructure - bits added on here and there without really having the full picture developed.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,172
Location
0035
I seem to recall reading a similar list to this in draft form some months back. But theres one difference. In this new version, the redoubling of the Weston-super-Mare loop has been ditched!
bastards....
Heard this afternoon at a meeting which NR attended that part of the northern part of the Weston-s-Mare loop will still be redoubled.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I'm not sure how that's going to work as the line would have to be 3rd rail in order to connect to the Waterloo - Reading line so how would HEX 332s get down it?
HEx trains should never meet the 'Airtrack' trains - there are spare platforms at T5 which would accommodate the service.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,052
Location
Reston City Centre
I use the term capacity with regard to the general improvements to the ECML outlined as opposed to just Kings Cross. My point is, that after all the improvements coined, the service should be much better.

I can't help feeling that a trick was missed with Kings Cross. The area around KX and St Pancras was in complete turmoil as all the improvements were made and I think that, surely, giving KX a bit of a kick at the same time would have made sense, especially in a planning capacity. But that seems to be the way with our rail infrastructure - bits added on here and there without really having the full picture developed.

That's fair enough, agree with all of it
 

will1337

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2008
Messages
613
Location
Laaandaaan
HEx trains should never meet the 'Airtrack' trains - there are spare platforms at T5 which would accommodate the service.

The article mentioned the HEx trains being extended south of the airport, so I wouldn't know where else to.
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
I'm not sure how that's going to work as the line would have to be 3rd rail in order to connect to the Waterloo - Reading line so how would HEX 332s get down it? Unless it were to be 25kV OHLE but that'd require some 450s getting pantographs fitted and some changes to diagrams. Otherwise diesels would have to be found from somewhere or new built and run along an electrified route apart from the last few miles which would be pretty wasteful.

The plan is to run 25k OHL to Staines. It will require dual-voltage stock to run the services from Waterloo, but HEx services will be able to run through and terminate at Staines (providing a connecting shuttle in addition to the through trains)
 

robvulpes

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2007
Messages
172
Quote:
Originally Posted by will1337
I'm not sure how that's going to work as the line would have to be 3rd rail in order to connect to the Waterloo - Reading line so how would HEX 332s get down it? Unless it were to be 25kV OHLE but that'd require some 450s getting pantographs fitted and some changes to diagrams. Otherwise diesels would have to be found from somewhere or new built and run along an electrified route apart from the last few miles which would be pretty wasteful.

The plan is to run 25k OHL to Staines. It will require dual-voltage stock to run the services from Waterloo, but HEx services will be able to run through and terminate at Staines (providing a connecting shuttle in addition to the through trains)

Not any more - see page 7 (right) of this (3.99MB .pdf file)

http://www.baa.com/assets/Internet...tic files/HeathrowAirtrack_Consultation2.pdf

Rob
 

mathmo

Member
Joined
28 Nov 2008
Messages
338
Does anyone know how the HEx trains are going to get to Staines then?
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,604
Heard this afternoon at a meeting which NR attended that part of the northern part of the Weston-s-Mare loop will still be redoubled.

Marvellous! should help Weston cope with the extra surge in visitors when the pier reopens.....
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,172
Location
0035
Marvellous! should help Weston cope with the extra surge in visitors when the pier reopens.....
Not much other postive news for Greater Bristol though - only 2 real things were that and also opening a new platform 1 at Bristol Parkway. Made progress on discussing redoubling part of Severn Beach line & 3rd bidirectional line from Dr Days.
 

mrcheek

Established Member
Joined
11 Sep 2007
Messages
1,604
Not much other postive news for Greater Bristol though - only 2 real things were that and also opening a new platform 1 at Bristol Parkway. Made progress on discussing redoubling part of Severn Beach line & 3rd bidirectional line from Dr Days.

to be honest though, I dont know that theres much else they need to do locally. Obviously, commuter trains are jam packed, but this is the case everywhere. During the daytime, capacity is about right.
The biggest problem the west country has, besides delays at WSM, and the constant chopping and changing on the Severn Beach line, is still the lack of extra capacity available to London, which would require work done on the Reading to London section.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top