flymo
Established Member
Why did you have to ruin such a wonderful post with a reference to that song?![]()
Sorry sir, can't Imagine why.. Just a nice song that's all ...

Why did you have to ruin such a wonderful post with a reference to that song?![]()

Our own glorious leader was part of that Hang Nelson Mandela campaign and went on an all expenses paid trip to South Africa to look at stopping sanctions because of apartheid. One mans freedom fighter is another man terrorist. Cameron is just in it for himself though.
)Our own glorious leader was part of that Hang Nelson Mandela campaign and went on an all expenses paid trip to South Africa to look at stopping sanctions because of apartheid. One mans freedom fighter is another man terrorist. Cameron is just in it for himself though.
Well said that man. A few facts are always worth digging out. (Cameron only started at university in October 85)Sorry to let the facts get in the way of a good rant, but "that Hang Nelson Mandela campaign" was 28 years ago in 1985 when Cameron was 19, and evidently took little interest in politics, let alone being a member of the Federation of Conservative Students (an organisation so extreme it was shut down by none other than Norman Tebbit one year later in 1986)
Well said that man. A few facts are always worth digging out. (Cameron only started at university in October 85)
As for the "all expenses paid" trip (interesting detail that - I wonder why it is relevant) it is usually described as a "fact finding" trip. So it is quite possible that, having seen the facts for himself, Cameron was, as he always claims, influenced by Mandela.
What really amuses/sickens me about this, and the similar memes floating round on the web, not to mention the speech by Peter Hain, is how they all seem to invoke fictitious or distorted history to make a point about the Tories. Mandela (and Thatcher, though one daren't really mention her) realised that the best way to stimulate change for the better is to work with people, not try to batter them. Co-operation and finding acceptable common ground as starting points were what brought down apartheid. The posters of these memes do not seem to have grasped this. (It's too late for Hain)
Without wishing to derail the thread any further Thatcher could hardly be said to have personified the above highlighted text!![]()
Well said that man. A few facts are always worth digging out. (Cameron only started at university in October 85)
As for the "all expenses paid" trip (interesting detail that - I wonder why it is relevant) it is usually described as a "fact finding" trip. So it is quite possible that, having seen the facts for himself, Cameron was, as he always claims, influenced by Mandela.
What really amuses/sickens me about this, and the similar memes floating round on the web, not to mention the speech by Peter Hain, is how they all seem to invoke fictitious or distorted history to make a point about the Tories. Mandela (and Thatcher, though one daren't really mention her) realised that the best way to stimulate change for the better is to work with people, not try to batter them. Co-operation and finding acceptable common ground as starting points were what brought down apartheid. The posters of these memes do not seem to have grasped this. (It's too late for Hain)
The attached letter is perhaps a useful historical insight into what was actually happening back in those days.
From what I can tell via the gift of google it is hard to find evidence that he was invlolved in the Hang Nelson Mandela campaign but that he most definitely was on an all expenses paid fact finding mission to stop sanctions. And that was from a right wing website.
In 2006, shortly after becoming Tory leader, Mr Cameron tried to make amends for his party's record on South Africa by visiting Nelson Mandela, by then President, at the same time as suggesting the party's policy from the 1980s was from another era that he did not belong to. He said at the time: "The mistakes my party made in the past with respect to relations with the African National Congress and sanctions on South Africa make it all the more important to listen now.
The fact that there is so much to celebrate in the new South Africa is not in spite of Mandela and the ANC; it is because of them and we Conservatives should say so clearly today."
But significant that, whilst in SA 24 years ago in 1989, Cameron also met with anti-apartheid campaigners, and met opposition politicians including Zeth Mothopeng, the head of the PAC, union leaders and was shown around mines.
Perhaps, rather than staying at home and pontificating, Cameron's fact finding trip led him to a more informed view of the situation and a new approach:
The new Black Middle Class has pulled the ladder up after them.
It seems greed and corruption are truly colour blind![]()
Mind you the guy with the "Red Beret" was quite amusing
One thing for certain the poor are now becoming worse off than they were under apartheid-economically at least.
I didn't watch it, but the 'Red Beret' guy would have been a member of the Economic Freedom Fighters, led by Julius Malema. Just wait until this guy gets into power; he wants to embark on a 'radical, leftist, Marxist-Leninist' programme of nationalisation.
See what the experts to say about Malema's plans for the new South Africa.
This is the same Malema who is yet to stand trial for fraud and racketeering. He was expelled from the ANC, and he also sang 'Shoot the Boer'.
His catch all policy? Forcibly remove white farmers from their land, with no compensation.
God help us.
OK, while accepting the fact that some colonial administrations were not perfect, even by the standards of the day, we did a darned sight better for Africa than the Belgians, Portuguese, French and Germans. We largely put in place the mechanisms for efficient governance, and, where they have remained the country is relatively stable. So when can we start to say our responsibility has been discharged? Or are we going to be lumbered with being the excuse for national inefficiency throughout sub-Saharan Africa as long as we exist?......
It's yet another huge black mark on our history and it's not going to get any better while we waste our time in Afghanistan chasing ghosts and do not accept the fact we as a nation have certain responsibilities in Africa.
Really? Do we really want to give Islamic extremists yet another excuse to involve us in jihad? Is it not possible that letting the jihadists get sucked in to all the messily tribal conflicts might actually benefit us by distracting their efforts?......The ironic thing is, with the rise of Islamic extremism in the continent if we focus our efforts there to make the place stable our own security concerns would improve drastically.
These are the figures for how many staff were sent to this event by UK broadcasters.
Sky - 15, ITV - 9, CH.5 - 4, CH.4 - 9,
BBC - 140
What a staggering waste of licence payers money but entirely in keeping with this organisations policy of complete disregard of any form of prudence.
BBC -" You make it what it is"
As The Worlds premier broadcaster I would expect nothing less. It may have escaped your attention but the licence fee has been ludicrously frozen for the last few years.
Despite this the BBC remains head and shoulders above any of the contemporaries you mention, indeed it has ten times as many outlets as SKY and is at least 100 times better![]()
If you believe that the organisation is free to waste money like it's going out of fashion why not send it a few quid.
By the way Sky News and Sky Sports are far far better in all aspects than the BBC and the difference being you aren't forced by law to subscribe.
If we were not forced to subscribe you would be left with an intellectual vacuum in broadcasting that may appeal to you, but I don't think everyone.

Do we have an intellectual vaccum in the rest of the media, where there is no compulsion to subscribe?![]()
If you consider the cost of a Sky package with the cost of a Licence Fee I believe the latter provides much better value for money overall.

Agreed, but there is at least the element of choice with Sky
Imagine a world where I had to pay the Daily Mail first before I could read any other newspaper!
Never thought I would be agreeing with Butts. Must be a Christmas miracle!
Like many others I question why the BBC had to devote an entire news bulletin to it and totally ignore the fact that the east coast of the UK was being hit by the biggest tidal surge in 60 years.
I don't wish to offend anybody but I was totally unmoved by the passing of Nelson Mandella, he was 95 years old and in poor health so it was hardly a shock.
Like many others I question why the BBC had to devote an entire news bulletin to it and totally ignore the fact that the east coast of the UK was being hit by the biggest tidal surge in 60 years.