ccityplanner12
Member
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2016
- Messages
- 203
Queenstown Road (according to Cartometro & my own observations) currently has a layout in which (going up) the Up fast has a viable platform while the Up slow doesn't; meanwhile in the other direction the down tracks merge into one. This means Up trains have to switch between tracks & run incorrectly (slow on fast, fast on slow), while down services share tracks for a very short section.
1950s maps show a platformless track in-between those for platforms 1 & 2, although its only purpose appears to be to accommodate trap points for freight trains leaving Nine Elms North goods depot.
The layout could be improved by relocating the Up fast & turning the former Up fast into the Down slow, giving an Up slow through platform 1, a platformless Up fast, a Down slow through platform 2 & a Down fast through platform 3.
In a twist to the story, Bing Maps shows the layout aforementioned, while Google Maps (which can generally be relied on to be more up-to-date) shows a stretch of tracks with fresh-looking ballast & a different layout: now, instead of merging with the Down fast, the Down slow merges with the Up fast. This could be a step towards changing to this layout.
1950s maps show a platformless track in-between those for platforms 1 & 2, although its only purpose appears to be to accommodate trap points for freight trains leaving Nine Elms North goods depot.
The layout could be improved by relocating the Up fast & turning the former Up fast into the Down slow, giving an Up slow through platform 1, a platformless Up fast, a Down slow through platform 2 & a Down fast through platform 3.
In a twist to the story, Bing Maps shows the layout aforementioned, while Google Maps (which can generally be relied on to be more up-to-date) shows a stretch of tracks with fresh-looking ballast & a different layout: now, instead of merging with the Down fast, the Down slow merges with the Up fast. This could be a step towards changing to this layout.