• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Murdoch & The Pie

Status
Not open for further replies.

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
Interesting afternoon in the committee room with one clown making a total fool out of himself,




........and another clown with a custard pie. <D


That was one hell of a right hook from Wendi. Could she be the next Prezza?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Kernowfem

Member
Joined
24 Oct 2009
Messages
726
Location
The Midlands
Shaving foam wasn't it?? Genius!! What did they intend to do.....shave him to death??

Probebly another nutter just trying to gain his/her five minutes of fame....
 

ushawk

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2010
Messages
1,965
Location
Eastbourne
Despite all whats been going on, Murdoch didnt deserve that. As said, just some idiot who will now be in a bit of trouble.
 

Captain Chaos

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2011
Messages
840
It appears more foam was on the attacker than the intended target from what I have seen. I know he is not the most favourite person in Britain right now but there is no need for that. The guy is 80 years old for goodness sake!

Sad fact is that now, instead of being remembered for the grilling they have had from the committee it will now be remembered for some clown seeking five minutes of fame and being an epic failure of a man by not only failing to hit his intended target but also getting clouted by the wife in the process. TBF, his wife was actually quite quick to get up and defend him I thought!
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,129
Location
Redcar
That was one hell of a right hook from Wendi. Could she be the next Prezza?

The saddest part is, if she did connect well, he could well press charges and it would most likely be allowed!
 

313103

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2006
Messages
1,595
Age is not the issue, he has a lot to answer for and not just the crap his newspapers print, we all think he is a old man however he rules News Corp with an iron fist. Just ask those printers who lost there jobs at News International in 1985.
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
11,129
Location
Redcar
Age is not the issue, he has a lot to answer for and not just the crap his newspapers print, we all think he is a old man however he rules News Corp with an iron fist. Just ask those printers who lost there jobs at News International in 1985.

Still not deserving of any attack though, no matter how trivial.
 

Striker

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
503
This is just like people who have nothing better to do than bang on the sides of police vans when pedophiles are taken to and from court. It says everything about the vigilantes and nothing about the person in the dock.
 

LE Greys

Established Member
Joined
6 Mar 2010
Messages
5,389
Location
Hitchin
It appears more foam was on the attacker than the intended target from what I have seen. I know he is not the most favourite person in Britain right now but there is no need for that. The guy is 80 years old for goodness sake!

Sad fact is that now, instead of being remembered for the grilling they have had from the committee it will now be remembered for some clown seeking five minutes of fame and being an epic failure of a man by not only failing to hit his intended target but also getting clouted by the wife in the process. TBF, his wife was actually quite quick to get up and defend him I thought!

Unfortunately, I think you're right, better to let it be remembered for one particular moment when someone caught him with a difficult question than some plonker throwing custard pies. Personally, I would have used a glass of water. More impact and better range. Not that I see the need to do it at all, it is better to watch someone fail than to humiliate yourself more than him.
 

passmore

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
341
Location
Milton Keynes
Age is not the issue, he has a lot to answer for and not just the crap his newspapers print, we all think he is a old man however he rules News Corp with an iron fist. Just ask those printers who lost there jobs at News International in 1985.

So you'd rather a pointless vigilante attack which serves only to inflate the ego of the protester and potentially undermine the hearing than actually listening to the hearing's outcome?

There are better ways of getting justice for someone with a 'lot to answer for' and fighting fire with fire is not one of them.
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
Unfortunately, I think you're right, better to let it be remembered for one particular moment when someone caught him with a difficult question than some plonker throwing custard pies. Personally, I would have used a glass of water. More impact and better range. Not that I see the need to do it at all, it is better to watch someone fail than to humiliate yourself more than him.
I quite agree - though from the few extracts I have seen - presumably chosen as the "best" bits - the two Murdochs were handling the situation quite well.

Age is not the issue, he has a lot to answer for and not just the crap his newspapers print, we all think he is a old man however he rules News Corp with an iron fist. Just ask those printers who lost there jobs at News International in 1985.
I think there is an interesting point there, that i have never actually seen addressed. What is it that Murdoch himself has to answer for? I suspect the chief reason for "hating" him amongst the leftist/liberal groups does have a tap root in the 1986 dispute (where intransigent workers refused to change in the face of new technology and refused meaningful negotiation - a familiar story across all industries at that time - and lost when other workers took over), but that is a quarter of a century ago. Apart from owning what I believe is an inappropriate share of British media, is there anything that he, as an individual, has done to abuse that position, that any other multi-company Chairman has not?
I do believe that the current "crisis" reveals a corruption that runs through society in the UK today. Not so much anyone being "bent", but the parallel assumptions that the end justifies the means and that holding a position of authority means that you should not be challenged when you use that authority in illegitimate ways. It is not just press, politicians, police - look at Network Rail yet again buying off whistleblowers, football managers using press conferences to influence referees, army brass covering up bullying at Deepcut. And, of course, we, the general public, are happy for it to go on, so long as we have our occasional circus.
 

passmore

Member
Joined
21 Mar 2011
Messages
341
Location
Milton Keynes
I think it's more the fact that somehow Rupert Murdoch has become a figurehead of corruption, that's why he's the subject of so much loathing. You can't blame corruption any more than you blame a thunderstorm on the horizon, it sadly exists, but attributing that to one person or more than one person gives people someone to vent their anger towards, or in this case, their custard pies. I do agree with you though: what has Murdoch got to answer for?
 

185

On Moderation
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
5,709
Murdoch's not really the figurehead for corruption.....

He is the corruption :)
 

Oswyntail

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2009
Messages
4,183
Location
Yorkshire
Murdoch's not really the figurehead for corruption.....

He is the corruption :)
Yes, that is what we are meant to believe.But what about other newspaper owners - they are scarcely beyond reproach. And we cannot claim that businessmen having close dealings with politicians is wrong if we accept that close dealings between politicians and unions is right. In what way is it wrong to allow policemen to "resign" before disciplinary action (and so preserve employment rights) but acceptable to allow MPs simply to "stand down" and not seek re-election? The corruption is in the culture that accepts "I have done nothing wrong" as a defence, rather than "I have done what is right".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top