• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Most irresponsible parent?

Status
Not open for further replies.

PaxVobiscum

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
2,411
Location
Glasgow
Please excuse the very poor enlargement from a mobile phone video, but you can probably see that the jeep is towing a child on a sledge on a public road.

I managed to catch a bit on film the second or third time this passed.

(Vimeo is doing odd things with resolution just now but it will play at 1080p - click on HD and select 720 or 1080p)

20 mph plus - enough to decapitate the child on the unbraked sledge if the jeep had to stop suddenly?

Unbelievable.
 

Attachments

  • towing.jpg
    towing.jpg
    275.3 KB · Views: 81
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,840
Location
Epsom
So what should I have done instead? Rushed out onto the street and been the cause of the predicted accident?

This would definitely be a 999 matter.

Aside from the risk mentioned above of the child slamming into the back of the vehicle, there is also the risk of someone turning out of a side street immediately after the vehicle has passed and going straight over the sledge.

It is an immediate risk to life by someone who should know better and "second or third pass" straight away adds "ongoing" to that.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
I'd agree calling 999 would be the first thing to do in these circumstances - I hope you did contact the police either on the emergency or non-emergency numbers. Utterly disgusted to see someone putting their child's life in danger. However, obtaining video evidence is actually a pretty sensible thing to do - it proves that this actually happened.

If the police did stop, I'd expect a whole bunch of people to get worked up about "'elf'n'safety gone stark raving mad". :roll:
 

PermitToTravel

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2011
Messages
3,042
Location
Groningen
Could that be made more safe? Putting the towrope through a scaffolding tube would prevent the kid from hitting the car. I don't think there's a solution to the visibility hazard other than not doing it on a public road though
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
17,840
Location
Epsom
Could that be made more safe? Putting the towrope through a scaffolding tube would prevent the kid from hitting the car. I don't think there's a solution to the visibility hazard other than not doing it on a public road though

We haven't get mentioned the high risk of the thing turning over; the pole wouldn't stop that from happening.

It would also likely impale the child if there was a sudden stop.
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,100
Location
Redcar
Perhaps it's just because I'm not a parent but it doesn't look like a 999 level of danger to me? 101 to be sure but 999? Seems an over-reaction...
 

D6975

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2009
Messages
3,050
Location
Bristol
Could that be made more safe? Putting the towrope through a scaffolding tube would prevent the kid from hitting the car. I don't think there's a solution to the visibility hazard other than not doing it on a public road though

I'm forever telling my 9 year old son that the best way to avoid having an accident is not to put yourself in a situation where it's possible for an accident to happen. Not always possible to do I know, but I think it's a good starting point for keeping him safe.
 

bnm

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2009
Messages
4,992
Perhaps it's just because I'm not a parent but it doesn't look like a 999 level of danger to me? 101 to be sure but 999? Seems an over-reaction...


Someone at risk of being injured, and a crime is being committed. Seems a slam dunk 999 to me.
 

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
Perhaps it's just because I'm not a parent but it doesn't look like a 999 level of danger to me? 101 to be sure but 999? Seems an over-reaction...

I could argue either way. It seems that the child is potentially in imminent danger - if that driver needs to make an emergency brake application the child will hit the back of the car at 20mph. The child could fall off the sled and sustain a serious head injury. I think you could argue that dialling 999 is appropriate, but equally I could see why one would dial 101. I don't think you'd be criticised either way.
 

PermitToTravel

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2011
Messages
3,042
Location
Groningen
We haven't get mentioned the high risk of the thing turning over; the pole wouldn't stop that from happening.

It would also likely impale the child if there was a sudden stop.
Having two ropes and scaffold poles would mitigate both risks but at that stage we're doing semi-serious engineering rather than having a bit of spontaneous fun in the snow
Yes, by not doing it although I suspect that on snow and ice the car may well take longer to stop than the sledge.
Unbraked?
Perhaps it's just because I'm not a parent but it doesn't look like a 999 level of danger to me? 101 to be sure but 999? Seems an over-reaction...
Low to low-moderate on my very poorly calibrated scale. The main thing I'd be worried about is it swinging from side to side bashing the kid into parked cars and the like, but that wouldn't stop me volunteering to get in it in all honesty
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
When asking for the police there's not much in it between calling 101 or 999. In most (all?) of the country your call will be taken by the same people who could decide to make an emergency response to a 101 call or no response to a 999 call. The important thing in a real emergency (won't comment on whether this is or isn't one) is just picking up the phone and getting some help

(nb: this does not reply when wanting the help of other emergency services - a 111 call isn't going to get you an ambulance, for example)
 
Last edited:

me123

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2007
Messages
8,510
(nb: this does not reply when wanting the help of other emergency services - a 111 call isn't going to get you an ambulance, for example)

Not entirely true - if you phone up 111 and clearly need an emergency blue light ambulance, they can and will dispatch one. It will probably take longer, but they will get one out to you. This is all a bit academic though, the message is really simple.

In an emergency dial 999.
 

PermitToTravel

Established Member
Joined
21 Dec 2011
Messages
3,042
Location
Groningen
Good to know that that's possible, though I agree very much with your bolded message.

On the topic of the thread, this is a thread on another forum that left me completely incredulous.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top