It was my mum’s card. As I received this letter it says the card belongs to a male. That’s what made me surprised. I’m confused at this point(as hearing date is 5th of June) this technical problem in the paperwork would be useful to raise any question.
Thank you for clarifying.
To clarify, you're pleading guilty - okay. So none of this really makes a difference; you're not trying to make a defence out of it, you accept the offences, and you will be convicted of the single offence and have the remainder of them taken into consideration.
question - image 3 shows the 'S9' statement from the officer who submitted the report, and i understand correctly then you are saying that the pass is issued to a female in fact when the S9 says male?
I do not think there is any chance that the OP is going to get away with this and be found not guilty just because of a minor error like that. The facts of the matter are that they were using a Freedom Pass issued to someone else, and to which they were not entitled.
oh definitely not, i completely agree. once you're on the TfL conveyor belt of justice and get to the forms OP has posted it generally is a lost cause from what i've seen.
www.railforums.co.uk
Hi there
You should take a reasonable estimate, which you can justify if you were challenged. So for example if you averaged the last 3 months or similar, and use that figure on the form, that would seem OK to me, so long as you could show the maths if asked. If that average happens to be fairly close to your salary for April or May then using that figure is also OK. What you must not do is something obviously unreasonable such as using your lowest ever month which is totally unrepresentative. It goes into bands anyway, so the odd pound here or there won't make a difference. If you attempt to deceive the courts about your income it is the sort of thing that will get you into a prison cell faster than your TfL offence.
Mc100 form from gov.uk I think. Does it have instructions for how to deal with that situation as it must be common.
Natwest give you a slip of paper, no stamp, no counterfoil, if you pay in using someone's bank account details. I've never heard of someone paying in cash at a bank to pay a court fine - this is by far the least secure way of paying; you really should be doing it online. I can only imagine the OP wants to conceal the nature of the payment from their bank statement for some reason.
Yes, good advice - I think @santosham should get in touch with the court (presumably the section that deals with fines and payments) and seek a written confirmation that they have received this payment and that the fine is paid and matters settled / concluded.
Confirmation should hopefully be available from the court itself - so ring / e-mail or go in person to the court.
Yes, no stamp ,not anything just the the slip with total amount paid,,in the reference the clerk put the case reference number.
£1200 solicitor
I'm not sure why you are recommending this - the court will record that the fine etc has been paid.
Because in my own case I favour retaining my own proofs as I find large organisations (eg banks and courts) can occasionally loose records of things or it involve time consuming processes to obtain them when asked for copies at unknown points of time in future.
Presumably you took that form with you, and they'll have noted down the case reference number blocked out, and used that as the payment reference?
