Not a fan of different coloured lights.
Go full bright white LED or warm white, but don't mix and match!
What's with the internal glass with zig zags and the purple LED strips?
LED strips are to indicate door closing status.
What does purple signify?
The seats don't look a lot different to the current ones.
There doesn't seem to be any PIS, probably not fitted yet.
I hope it will be something like the 700s (or Stadler's Flirts in Bavaria).
is that terrahawks?????Yes indeed
sparing with the yellow.....it'll end up looking like ryanair!That's a really smart looking train. Like the use of LED's on front and around doors.
Interior a bit too spartan looking. A bit more yellow tastefully used wouldn't go amiss.
Yes, I know what you mean! They're quite nice trains to be honest, so I guess that is just their style.Lol, if it wasn't for the screens you would think that berlin photo was taken in the 80's, even with the screens it looks 90's.
They do, to an extent. Currently on the Merseytravel map, Red is City Line, Green is Wirral Line and Blue? Is Northern Line.I wonder if the LED strip on the front will be used to indicate route? I don't know if merseyraip currently have coloured routes, but if they don't this could be developed
That's why I said tastefully!sparing with the yellow.....it'll end up looking like ryanair!
sparing with the yellow.....it'll end up looking like ryanair!
is that terrahawks?????
The current trains manage to have a sensible 2+2 arrangement just fine, so there appears to be an option already in existence.To keep within the UK loading gauge, there aren't many options for high-density commuter stock. So either there is 2+2 seating of 3+2 sized seats with a decent gangway (ala classes 700/707/717), or longitudonal seats (ala classes 345/710). Some of those have combinations of those seat configurations but the bottom line is that high-density requirements mean narrower seats and fewer of them.
I stand by what I said and have emphasised the important words: "there aren't many options for high-density commuter stock". Even if all longitudonal seats are fitted, they will be shallow to reduce the intrusion on standing space, and of minimum width to mitigate the reduced number of seats possible in that configuration. Both of these measures are proven on LU, LO and metro systems the world over. The complaints will then come those who commute from Southport, Chester and the other extremities. Remember, not everybody goes three stops either .The current trains manage to have a sensible 2+2 arrangement just fine, so there appears to be an option already in existence.
I stand by my point. While it doesn't need the current space between the seats, it does need some. All the discomfort of 3+2 seating in a 2+2 setting.
I have to say I think they've fundamentally fouled up on this seating layout on top of the comfort issue. It's not an end to end journey system, so there is a lot of getting in and out of seats. Add this layout to peak hour and the resultant delays getting people on and off the train every two minutes I think will prove to hit reliability hard. There's a reason why LT uses the various seating styles it does on the overground and underground.
They look completely different to the current ones. The current seats are the same as those fitted to the Southern 455s etc, so high backed, not low back with weird headrest thing....
I wonder if the LED strip on the front will be used to indicate route? I don't know if merseyraip currently have coloured routes, but if they don't this could be developed
These seats look nothing like Swiss FLIRT seats, the only similarity is that they have a narrow headrest that covers part of the seatback.They’re Stadler seats, a higher backed version of the ones on the Swiss FLIRTs.
Yes, I agree completely. Even replicating the current set up but with slightly less lateral spacing between the seats would have been better. It's a metro system in all but name, and neither the tube not the overground has its priorities dictated to it by the network extremities. It has to cope to the common denominator, which is mass movement of people on a frequent stop network.Regarding seating, I think they’ll find the airline seating to be a mistake, especially with the limited space between seats.
Interesting that those Berlin trains have a similar layout to the London S8s, with transverse seats on one side and longitudinal on the other.
The S8s are the only train (AFAIK) in the UK which uses this layout, which is a bit of shame as to me it gives the best of both worlds, some transverse seats (with better width spacing than the 700s etc) plus decent standing room.
It will depend on the exact positioning and the width of the doors, but in comparison, the existing T&W Metro stock has a similar centre pole which doesn't seem to encumber wheelchairs or buggies.won't the central pole between the facing doors make getting wheelchairs on/off difficult?
won't the central pole between the facing doors make getting wheelchairs on/off difficult?
It will depend on the exact positioning and the width of the doors, but in comparison, the existing T&W Metro stock has a similar centre pole which doesn't seem to encumber wheelchairs or buggies.
I guess you've never travelled on a late-night Friday Metro then...I would be more worried about the unintended uses some of the more energetic evening revellers could find for a pole in such a prominent position. I have full confidence of the manufacturers to design a vehicle that accommodates the needs of users. I have less confidence they will anticipate the levels of decorum to which British revellers will stoop.
Yes, I agree completely. Even replicating the current set up but with slightly less lateral spacing between the seats would have been better. It's a metro system in all but name, and neither the tube not the overground has its priorities dictated to it by the network extremities. It has to cope to the common denominator, which is mass movement of people on a frequent stop network.