• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Mayhem at Truro

Status
Not open for further replies.

Requeststop

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2012
Messages
1,001
Location
Carbis Bay, St Ives, Cornwall
Arrived at 11:30 at Truro Station to go to St Ives to find 70 or so people besieging the entrance. Why? No trains running at all. The reason? A broken down train on the Falmouth line.

Now when I say no trains running at all, I do me No trains on the Up and Down Cornish Main line. Staff could not tell us why, but it seems strange that a faulty train on the branch line should not cause the cancellation of trains on the Main line. Even people asking if trains tomorrow will be running and staff, (god bless them they do try) couldn't answer. Grateful for any reasoning as to why? Spoiled a lovely day for once down here.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,990
Arrived at 11:30 at Truro Station to go to St Ives to find 70 or so people besieging the entrance. Why? No trains running at all. The reason? A broken down train on the Falmouth line.

Now when I say no trains running at all, I do me No trains on the Up and Down Cornish Main line. Staff could not tell us why, but it seems strange that a faulty train on the branch line should not cause the cancellation of trains on the Main line. Even people asking if trains tomorrow will be running and staff, (god bless them they do try) couldn't answer. Grateful for any reasoning as to why? Spoiled a lovely day for once down here.
It was the Down sleeper on the main line that failed, apparently.
 

Sleepy

Established Member
Joined
15 Feb 2009
Messages
1,832
Location
East Anglia
The combination of location of the failure and the new signalling system prevented operation of trains on Falmouth branch too.
 

Requeststop

Member
Joined
21 Jan 2012
Messages
1,001
Location
Carbis Bay, St Ives, Cornwall
The questions asked in posts 4-6 are what puzzled me. Why were staff telling the paying and travelling public that it was a problem on the branch line. A poster outside the station advised that tickets could be used on bus services to Falmouth U1 and U1A and to Penzance and St Ives T1 and T2? I am sure that the staff were telling us what the honestly knew. The was no indication that the problem was further down towards Penzance, and yes, why did the rescue involve the run to Plymouth and back. Nothing at Long Rock or at St Blazey to assist? If it was because of the new signalling, then something will have to be changed, and fast.
 

merry

Member
Joined
19 Oct 2011
Messages
177
Well, if the down sleeper had failed, then the stock for the branch was likely unable to run into Truro from depot/stabling (I see it comes in from Penzance), so presumably the failure blocked the junction at Truro west end. I doubt it was directly a result of new signalling, except that the recovery may have left train detection needing reset, particularly if axle counters are used. That would have taken time to achieve safely (e.g. needing technicians to attend), and could have locked pointwork in the meantime. Cornwall is big (well ok, long) and technicians rare, so it takes time to get the right boots on the ground.
As to why run to Plymouth? Well, if recovery comes from that end, and attaches to the rear, it is unlikely to be permitted to propel a loco hauled train any significant distance with passengers aboard. Thus the train has to be withdrawn in the up direction and if run around cannot be achieved earlier, noting that a lot more space is required for a sleeper train plus castle set and the combination likely does not fit in any platforms with run round along the way, then first safe opportunity would be in Plymouth.
All appears very messy but that is how the regulations work, all being designed to operate safely. If slow to recover normal working!
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,358
Location
Somerset
Looks like a typical railway communications failure. Unless the sleeper was running several hours late, by 11.30 this would no longer be a new “incident” and there should have been plenty of time to get the “facts” to Truro. “A train has failed at xyz. Unfortunately the train that works the branch line to Falmouth is stuck beyond the failed train and can’t get past, so there will be no trains to Falmouth until further notice. The next update will be at (15 minutes’ time).” [example only]. Getting this out to the travelling public is probably the most important thing that needs to be done once the safety of trains /passengers has been ensured.
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
Why did the rescue have to involve running to Plymouth and back to Long Rock?
Because the rescue train could only get on the rear. It can’t push that distance from truro to Penzance so had to drag it somewhere it could be run round.

The sleeper failed after penwithers junction, but the following train was between the station and penwithers, blocking access from Truro to the Falmouth branch. The following train after some time was reversed into Truro.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,942
Location
Airedale
Because the rescue train could only get on the rear. It can’t push that distance from truro to Penzance so had to drag it somewhere it could be run round.
and with trains in platform back to Bodmin Parkway there was little choice!
 

Taunton

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
12,255
A poster outside the station advised that tickets could be used on bus services to Falmouth U1 and U1A and to Penzance and St Ives T1 and T2? I am sure that the staff were telling us what the honestly knew.
It's strange that The Railway seems to think there is sufficient spare capacity on existing bus services (even what is left of them in rural areas) to just absorb their rail passengers. No wonder the DfT start to think the same.
 

skyetraveller

Member
Joined
29 Nov 2012
Messages
40
It's strange that The Railway seems to think there is sufficient spare capacity on existing bus services (even what is left of them in rural areas) to just absorb their rail passengers. No wonder the DfT start to think the same.
One hundred percent agree! Up here in the Scottish Highlands, every time there's a problem on the highland main line ScotRail announce that "ticket acceptance is in place on Citylink between Inverness and Glasgow/Edinburgh". Has anyone from ScotRail ever tried boarding a Citylink at Inverness in July without a ticket booked weeks in advance?
 

richw

Veteran Member
Joined
10 Jun 2010
Messages
11,528
Location
Liskeard
One hundred percent agree! Up here in the Scottish Highlands, every time there's a problem on the highland main line ScotRail announce that "ticket acceptance is in place on Citylink between Inverness and Glasgow/Edinburgh". Has anyone from ScotRail ever tried boarding a Citylink at Inverness in July without a ticket booked weeks in advance?
Rail phones the bus company for acceptance on each assistance. Rail pays the bus company a tasty sum as soon as they say ok.
Neither bother thinking about capacity. A train with a few hundred passengers, a bus every 30 mins with 80 seats and already a number of its own passengers. It just doesn’t add up. Bus company gets sum of money even though they don’t get many train passengers on due to capacity
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top