• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Mail article - I'm a bit puzzled?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,777
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rshaw-slams-Virgin-Trains-charging-1-000.html
A BBC DJ has attacked Virgin Trains for charging almost £1,000 for a return first class rail fare.

Liz Kershaw attempted to book a train journey for friends to travel from Stockport to Ashford in Kent on Sunday.

But the 59-year-old broadcaster was shocked when she discovered the cost of a first class open return on the Virgin website was £951.20.

Sharing a photo of the fare on Twitter, she wrote: ‘Unbelievable! Are you SURE @VirginTrains??? #NorthernPowerhouseRail.’
It says she booked "for friends" but I can't see how many - so clearly the fare quoted is nothing like the fare for one person.
However on Trainline a 1st anytime return Manchester - Ashford is £573 which is reduced to £350 off-peak anytime return. Book to go this aftrenoon and return tomorrow on specific trains (1st) gets you down to under £300 if you MUST go first class. Dont think I can "fly to New York" for that - not walk-up anyway!
Anyhow, can anyone decpiher the article and try to explain what's going on as in where's this "£1000" come from?? Thanks!!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Warwick

Member
Joined
10 Apr 2018
Messages
353
Location
On the naughty step again.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...rshaw-slams-Virgin-Trains-charging-1-000.html

It says she booked "for friends" but I can't see how many - so clearly the fare quoted is nothing like the fare for one person.
However on Trainline a 1st anytime return Manchester - Ashford is £573 which is reduced to £350 off-peak anytime return. Book to go this aftrenoon and return tomorrow on specific trains (1st) gets you down to under £300 if you MUST go first class. Dont think I can "fly to New York" for that - not walk-up anyway!
Anyhow, can anyone decpiher the article and try to explain what's going on as in where's this "£1000" come from?? Thanks!!

It's come from the Daily Mail hates trains and Liz Kershaw wants a bit of publicity.
 

FenMan

Established Member
Joined
13 Oct 2011
Messages
1,541
It's come from the Daily Mail hates trains and Liz Kershaw wants a bit of publicity.

I love trains, but the yield management operated by the TOCs seems locked in the past compared with airlines and hotels. I'm in Sydney at the moment, on business. I booked flights at 24 hours notice and flew with Cathay Pacific for £707 return. Over 50 per cent of the fare covers airport departure taxes. When 4 meals out and 4 meals back, with drinks, are factored in someone isn't making much money for flying me over 20,000 miles. But that's competition for you.
 

CheapAndNerdy

Member
Joined
17 Jan 2010
Messages
357
1 anytime first class return (£573) + 1 railcard-discounted anytime first class return (£378.20) adds up to £951.20, the amount quoted.
 

WelshBluebird

Established Member
Joined
14 Jan 2010
Messages
5,591
I love trains, but the yield management operated by the TOCs seems locked in the past compared with airlines and hotels. I'm in Sydney at the moment, on business. I booked flights at 24 hours notice and flew with Cathay Pacific for £707 return. Over 50 per cent of the fare covers airport departure taxes. When 4 meals out and 4 meals back, with drinks, are factored in someone isn't making much money for flying me over 20,000 miles. But that's competition for you.

Thing is, most people I imagine don't book flights or hotels with just 24 hours notice (and certainly even less people just walk up without booking).
With the railways in the UK, a substantial percentage of travel is still walk up.
Add to that, unless you physically can't fit on the train, there are no allocated tickets that must be sold or they go unsold, then the yield management world changes quite a lot.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,380
Location
LBK
I love trains, but the yield management operated by the TOCs seems locked in the past compared with airlines and hotels. I'm in Sydney at the moment, on business. I booked flights at 24 hours notice and flew with Cathay Pacific for £707 return. Over 50 per cent of the fare covers airport departure taxes. When 4 meals out and 4 meals back, with drinks, are factored in someone isn't making much money for flying me over 20,000 miles. But that's competition for you.

That’s not correct about airport departure taxes. On a return ticket, SYD-HKG:

Australia Passenger Movement Charge PMC (AU)
£34.10

Australia Passenger Services Charge Departure International (WY)
£35.60

Hong Kong Airport Construction Fee (G3)
£15.20

Hong Kong Air Passenger Departure Tax (HK)
£11.40

Hong Kong Airport Passenger Security Charge (I5)
£4.30


Comes to less than £100.
 

otomous

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2011
Messages
444
Rail is a public service, privately run. TOCs don’t have full freedom to set fares. They can’t withdraw unprofitable trains. Their profit margins are small. The fare structure to some extent is designed to encourage travel at particular times to avoid crowding and make better use of off peak resources. Comparing flying to New York on an advance ticket to a rail ticket booked at short notice is no comparison. How about we try it the other way round for a change? Been through all this before. Nothing to see here.
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
Rail is a public service, privately run. TOCs don’t have full freedom to set fares. They can’t withdraw unprofitable trains. Their profit margins are small. The fare structure to some extent is designed to encourage travel at particular times to avoid crowding and make better use of off peak resources. Comparing flying to New York on an advance ticket to a rail ticket booked at short notice is no comparison. How about we try it the other way round for a change? Been through all this before. Nothing to see here.
Looking at VTWC's latest financial accounts, they made a profit before tax of 5.8% of their revenue. That's a fairly healthy profit margin on its own for any transport undertaking - when you then consider that the amount of investment Virgin Rail Group and Stagecoach have put in, as well as the risk they have taken, that is a very healthy return on investment indeed.
 

Howardh

Established Member
Joined
17 May 2011
Messages
9,777
1 anytime first class return (£573) + 1 railcard-discounted anytime first class return (£378.20) adds up to £951.20, the amount quoted.
Thanks for that, have you ever thought of writing for a newspaper?!
That first figure is still a whopper, of course it can be whittled down substantially by booking even a few hours in advance, and splitting of course. But really a passenger shouldn't walk up and be faced with a fare that big for a 270-odd mile trip, even first class. Think there really should be a maximum fare for any trip so at leats passengers know a figure it can't go above. Maybe a nice round £400 1st anytime return whether it's Manchester - London or Penzance - Truro? Another thread, perhaps, meanwhilr thanks for answering my question.
 

Haywain

Veteran Member
Joined
3 Feb 2013
Messages
24,615
On a return ticket, SYD-HKG:
I think FenMan meant that he had flown from the UK to Sydney and will be flying back. That will up the value of the taxes quite a bit.
of course it can be whittled down substantially by booking even a few hours in advance, and splitting of course.
I saw the original tweet, and the date being looked at was Sunday 17th June for the outward journey, so she was trying to book in advance. I responded to the tweet suggesting trying TrainSplit.
 

DelW

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2015
Messages
5,974
Comparing flying to New York on an advance ticket to a rail ticket booked at short notice is no comparison. How about we try it the other way round for a change? Been through all this before. Nothing to see here.
Just out of interest, I tried that. First class flexible tickets on BA for one passenger, London - New York & return, outbound tomorrow and return on Monday, come to just under £13,000. Very roughly double the price per mile of the £573 rail ticket. Probably better on-board service though :).
 

ys123

Member
Joined
13 Dec 2015
Messages
242
Location
Manchester
new.trainsplit.com brings up a range of options £300-360 (depending on where/how you do the splits) instead of £573.
 
Last edited:

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,380
Location
LBK
I think FenMan meant that he had flown from the UK to Sydney and will be flying back. That will up the value of the taxes quite a bit.


On a round trip LHR-SYD connecting via HKG:


Australia Passenger Services Charge Arrival International (WY)
£35.60

Hong Kong Airport Construction Fee (G3)
£30.40

Hong Kong Airport Passenger Security Charge (I5)
£8.60

United Kingdom Air Passenger Duty APD (GB)
£78.00

United Kingdom Passenger Service Charge Departures (UB)
£44.91

Australia Passenger Movement Charge PMC (AU)
£34.10





Total: £233.01.

Nowhere near 70% of the total amount due.
 

FQTV

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2012
Messages
1,067
On a round trip LHR-SYD connecting via HKG:


Australia Passenger Services Charge Arrival International (WY)
£35.60

Hong Kong Airport Construction Fee (G3)
£30.40

Hong Kong Airport Passenger Security Charge (I5)
£8.60

United Kingdom Air Passenger Duty APD (GB)
£78.00

United Kingdom Passenger Service Charge Departures (UB)
£44.91

Australia Passenger Movement Charge PMC (AU)
£34.10





Total: £233.01.

Nowhere near 70% of the total amount due.

The base fare would have been £251.39 on his ticket, so in fact about 64% of the total cost would have been made up of what a lot of people refer to as 'taxes', and sometimes erroneously as 'departure taxes'.

These are more accurately referred as 'taxes, fees and charges' and, in this case would include £224 of 'carrier imposed surcharges', coded YQ on most airlines that impose them, but YR on Cathay Pacific.

The 'carrier imposed surcharge' is, of course, just a fare supplement by any other name, and goes directly to the airline.

So, it's true to say that from the basic breakdown and limited explanation that airlines are apt to provide, it does indeed look as though only £251.39 of a £707.00 ticket is the fare, and that the rest (over 50%, actually 64% in this case) must be going elsewhere.

Only by knowing that YQ/YR is effectively still 'fare' would you know that the calculation in this case would actually be £475.39 to the airline, and £231.61 collected for remittance to third parties, or 67.5% fare and 32.5% collects.

I'd agree with @FenMan though that taking his ticket in isolation, even at the £475.39 level, that's very little revenue for the service received.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top