• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

London to Birmingham

Status
Not open for further replies.

maniacmartin

Established Member
Fares Advisor
Joined
15 May 2012
Messages
5,437
Location
Croydon
Hi,

My other half needs to make an off-peak period return journey from London to Birmingham soon, but cannot commit to specific times, so we are planning to get a London Midlands only or Chiltern Trains only ticket to keep the price down.

Can anyone advise on which of these TOCs is most likely give the most comfortable ride (Ideally quiet enough to read books on the train)?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Rich McLean

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2012
Messages
1,757
Hi,

My other half needs to make an off-peak period return journey from London to Birmingham soon, but cannot commit to specific times, so we are planning to get a London Midlands only or Chiltern Trains only ticket to keep the price down.

Can anyone advise on which of these TOCs is most likely give the most comfortable ride (Ideally quiet enough to read books on the train)?

Chiltern, every time, especially if it's a Loco Hauled service. It's also quicker the London Midland
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
I'd say Chiltern all day long perosnally, they tend to be slightly quieter and a lot quicker than London Midland (with less stops too), plus their Class 168 (Clubmans) are a lot more comfortable than a LM 350/2, which tend to haunt Euston-New St trains alongside the better 350/1s. Also, the 168s have a Quiet Zone and plug sockets at each seat, and an at-seat trolley on the fast trains midweek too.
 

howittpie

Member
Joined
11 May 2012
Messages
329
100% Chiltern are quicker than LM you also get free wifi and at certain times of day a trolley service. I wouldn't say Chiltern are quiet every train I have been on recently has been busy.
 

trentside

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2010
Messages
3,390
Location
Messroom
I'd also favour Chiltern over London Midland. I find the trains (both 67+MK3s and 168s) to be more comfortable than the 350/2s usually used by London Midland. I prefer the scenery along the Chiltern route too.
 

Lad Brookes

Member
Joined
9 Nov 2010
Messages
202
Thanks to the lack of a morning restriction on the Super Off Peak out of Marylebone, Chiltern can be cheaper at times, as well as quicker and more comfortable than LM.
 

VTPreston_Tez

Member
Joined
26 Jan 2012
Messages
1,159
Location
Preston
I agree - while the LM trains are barable the Chiltern services are much more luxurious and judging by the others quicker.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,742
I went Chiltern from Marylebone to Moor St last Friday just after lunch, and barely got a seat. So it does get busy.
 

sprinterguy

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Mar 2010
Messages
11,569
Location
Macclesfield
I went Chiltern from Marylebone to Moor St last Friday just after lunch, and barely got a seat. So it does get busy.
Even most of the evening trains seem to be full and even standing during the week, particularly on Fridays. If Chiltern actually succeed in attracting many passengers off the West Coast, they're going to have to get some longer trains!
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,742
Even most of the evening trains seem to be full and even standing during the week, particularly on Fridays. If Chiltern actually succeed in attracting many passengers off the West Coast, they're going to have to get some longer trains!

They have succeeded in attracting passengers off the West Coast. But suspect they might just sell fewer of the cheapest tickets before buying more trains though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top