• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

LNER Azuma (Class 800/801)

Status
Not open for further replies.

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,506
I'm pretty sure that GWR one was debunked wasn't it? I seem to recall people saying the HST departure was at a far lower power setting than usually used.
Yes I think it was. You can see in the comments on the youtube page.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
3,683
Not arguing with the premise but I'm not sure what that video demonstrates as it doesn't give anything to compare with!
The end of the video ends up around 7.9 miles with the train doing 123mph ...note the time taken to get there. An average HST takes 6 mins 15 seconds to reach 7.9 miles and is only doing 115mph at that point!
Or in other words - in 5 minutes FROM REST - a Class 800 is over 2 miles ahead of the HST!!
 

westv

Established Member
Joined
29 Mar 2013
Messages
4,410
All I know is that the HSTs I travel on seem to take ages to actually move after the power comes on. I know it probably isn't that long - it just seems it.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,896
The 800s on electric or diesel knock spots off the 91+Mk4 sets in terms of acceleration, and are significantly quicker than an HST. You actually feel yourself being pushed back into the seat when the driver opens up.
 

BRX

Established Member
Joined
20 Oct 2008
Messages
4,506
As I understand it, they are quicker on electric, but on diesel although the initial acceleration is better, that's only up to a certain speed after which an HST outperforms them meaning that an HST will get to a high speed earlier than an IET running on diesel.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
8,409
Location
UK
As I understand it, they are quicker on electric, but on diesel although the initial acceleration is better, that's only up to a certain speed after which an HST outperforms them meaning that an HST will get to a high speed earlier than an IET running on diesel.

Which doesn't mean much as they'll be on electric for all the high speeds stretches anyway!
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
3,683
The 800s on electric or diesel knock spots off the 91+Mk4 sets in terms of acceleration, and are significantly quicker than an HST. You actually feel yourself being pushed back into the seat when the driver opens up.
To put things into perspective..a 91 over the same distance ...7.9 miles would take around 5 min 57 secs...so 20 secs slower than an HST. The 800 in the video took 5 min 10 secs. I recorded a more powerful Class 802 doing this in 4 mins 55 seconds. So 15 secs quicker than the 800. Class 390 Pendolinos are almost on a par with Class 800s to the same distance.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
3,683
Which doesn't mean much as they'll be on electric for all the high speeds stretches anyway!
Depends on the day and circumstances. It is not unusual to see a Class 800 running in diesel only mode. But less likely than 6 months ago.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
3,683
All I know is that the HSTs I travel on seem to take ages to actually move after the power comes on. I know it probably isn't that long - it just seems it.
Yes they do. But they were designed to cruise long distances with few stops and not today's stopping patterns.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
18,768
Yes they do. But they were designed to cruise long distances with few stops and not today's stopping patterns.
So the comparison in this thread is a pointless exercise then. Different designs, separated by 40 years, with different design criteria.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
So the comparison in this thread is a pointless exercise then. Different designs, separated by 40 years, with different design criteria.
Not all. I mean, it's perhaps been done to death by now, but comparisons are perfectly valid - the way the railway operates has changed - here comes along a newer design of train designed (or so you'd hope) with that new mode of operation in mind - how does it compare to the previous generation of rolling stock which wasn't designed for current conditions? It should be substantially better. How much better? That's what the data from RPS is helpful in providing to the general public.
 

83G/84D

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
6,151
Location
Cornwall
Set 107 was at the north end of Newcastle station earlier, it appeared to be parked up in a siding. Set 104 was in York station a short while ago and appeared ready to head south.
 

83G/84D

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2011
Messages
6,151
Location
Cornwall
Set 107 was at the north end of Newcastle station earlier, it appeared to be parked up in a siding. Set 104 was in York station a short while ago and appeared ready to head south.

And if anyone is interested set number 108 was at Kings Cross an hour ago.
 

Mollman

Established Member
Joined
21 Sep 2016
Messages
1,708
Location
Preston
So the comparison in this thread is a pointless exercise then. Different designs, separated by 40 years, with different design criteria.

Yes, that's why the PR 'Isn't the new much better than the old' is guff.
 

JDEunos

Member
Joined
5 Oct 2018
Messages
14
Just saw an unliveried unit go past my work at Shipley

Testing for the Skipton to LKX route?
 

Silver Cobra

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2015
Messages
1,004
Location
Bedfordshire
I've just booked myself a return journey from Arlesey to Blackpool North via Leeds for the middle of June, and from the seat map for reserving on the LNER leg of the journey, it seems I'm booked on Azumas in both directions. So this will be my first experience of the Azumas upon their introduction, unless any last minute substitutions occur.

Interesting to see that the 9-car Azumas introduce another new coach letter configuration, using the following:

A - B - C - G (Shop/Food Bar) - H - J - K (1st) - L (1st) - M (1st)

That'll probably cause a fair amount of confusion for passengers during the early days, as they won't match up with the signs at most of the stations.
 

ChrisG382000

New Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
1
I've just booked myself a return journey from Arlesey to Blackpool North via Leeds for the middle of June, and from the seat map for reserving on the LNER leg of the journey, it seems I'm booked on Azumas in both directions. So this will be my first experience of the Azumas upon their introduction, unless any last minute substitutions occur.

Interesting to see that the 9-car Azumas introduce another new coach letter configuration, using the following:

A - B - C - G (Shop/Food Bar) - H - J - K (1st) - L (1st) - M (1st)

That'll probably cause a fair amount of confusion for passengers during the early days, as they won't match up with the signs at most of the stations.

Out of interest, which service are you travelling on? Trying to find an Azuma on the booking system but no luck so far
 

Silver Cobra

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2015
Messages
1,004
Location
Bedfordshire
Out of interest, which service are you travelling on? Trying to find an Azuma on the booking system but no luck so far

I'm travelling on the 0803 Kings Cross - Leeds service on Monday 17th June (0851 from Peterborough) and the 1345 Leeds - Kings Cross service on Thursday 20th June
 

800001

Established Member
Joined
24 Oct 2015
Messages
7,317
I've just booked myself a return journey from Arlesey to Blackpool North via Leeds for the middle of June, and from the seat map for reserving on the LNER leg of the journey, it seems I'm booked on Azumas in both directions. So this will be my first experience of the Azumas upon their introduction, unless any last minute substitutions occur.

Interesting to see that the 9-car Azumas introduce another new coach letter configuration, using the following:

A - B - C - G (Shop/Food Bar) - H - J - K (1st) - L (1st) - M (1st)

That'll probably cause a fair amount of confusion for passengers during the early days, as they won't match up with the signs at most of the stations.

Same lettering as on gwr, I can imagine the platform letters will be removed.
 

chuff chuff

Member
Joined
25 Sep 2018
Messages
670
The end of the video ends up around 7.9 miles with the train doing 123mph ...note the time taken to get there. An average HST takes 6 mins 15 seconds to reach 7.9 miles and is only doing 115mph at that point!
Or in other words - in 5 minutes FROM REST - a Class 800 is over 2 miles ahead of the HST!!

As a small aside I've had a few goes at 0-100 with the four coach scotrail hst and your looking at two and a quarter miles and two and a half minutes to get hit that mark.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top