Well its just that there have been complaints that the 350/1 first class isnt much different to standard class, and with the 350/4's being 2+1 in first (then again they probably did that to keep them in line with the 180's) I thought that the 350/3's FC might have been done to a higher standard.
Especially given that LM seem committed to the Trent Valley route and a high proportion of First Class passengers on this route board at Lichfield (and to a lesser extent Stoke), the journey times from both of these stations to London being considerable. Considering many of these passengers are used to travelling with Virgin I often hear comments such as "is this it?" or "isn't it rather cramped?" or "why are there so few tables?". Sometimes people walk straight through First Class only to 'discover' it later!
I think it would be short-sighted for LM not to have gone with 2+1 seating (and raised ticket prices proportionally) but (a) maybe they just don't care; (b) maybe the micro-managing DfT doesn't want 2+1 seating.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
A snapshot of the interior: Not much to see here, but they do have plug sockets. (LMs photo)
Three further things I've noticed about this picture are: (a) the Standard Class tables are those that currently exist in First Class (notice the grey ring around the edge of the table and its relatively uniform width - the existing Standard Class tables have no grey ring and are narrower, particularly towards the edge - see
here and
here); (b) the seatback table
looks like those currently in First Class (deep enough to accommodate a small laptop - though it's so obscure I can't be certain); (c) the power sockets are underneath the table whereas those currently in First Class are on the wall, so part of the design has changed.
Considering the only remaining difference between First and Standard Class will be the provision of a blind, I will be genuinely surprised if First Class doesn't change (then again, if it doesn't, I just won't use it any longer!).