• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Line and station closure procedures in other countries

Status
Not open for further replies.

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,182
In the UK, or at least in mainland Britain, whenever a line or station is proposed for closure there is a legal procedure that has to be followed. The train operator concerned has to issue a closure notice that has to be posted at the station(s) concerned and usually at a number of other stations in the area, particularly at stations that are served by direct trains to and from the stations that are to close. This gives affected passengers the opportunity to object to the closure, and if any objections are received, the Transport Secretary (or possibly now the Office of Rail and Road?) has to consider those objections before deciding whether to consent to the closure. This has been a requirement at least since the Transport Act of 1962, I believe.

Does anyone know if any other countries in Europe (or the rest of the world for that matter) have any kind of formal closure procedure that has to be followed and whereby affected passengers can make representations?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,436
Location
Somerset
AIUI, in Germany it is the infrastructure that is protected, not the service, which can be withdrawn “at the drop of a hat” if the responsible authority chooses not to fund it (effectively - the responsible authority pays for “train kilometres”). Thus you see a lot of redundant infrastructure disappearing into the undergrowth but still officially an operational railway.
 

AY1975

Established Member
Joined
14 Dec 2016
Messages
2,182
AIUI, in Germany it is the infrastructure that is protected, not the service, which can be withdrawn “at the drop of a hat” if the responsible authority chooses not to fund it (effectively - the responsible authority pays for “train kilometres”). Thus you see a lot of redundant infrastructure disappearing into the undergrowth but still officially an operational railway.
Indeed, I believe that in Germany it is the federal states (the "Länder" or "Bundesländer") that provide funding for regional services and can at any time choose to stop funding a particular service. AFAIK in France this responsibility rests with the regions.

I would guess that Britain may be pretty much unique in having the level of safeguards that we have in ensuring that passengers affected by a line or station closure are informed of the proposal and given an opportunity to object to the closure. In many other countries, if you are a user of a line or station that is proposed for closure, the onus is probably on you to find out about the proposal, for example through media reports, and to proactively approach your regional government representatives to make them aware of how the closure would affect you.
 

TheWierdOne

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2020
Messages
410
Location
Yorkshire
Indeed, I believe that in Germany it is the federal states (the "Länder" or "Bundesländer") that provide funding for regional services and can at any time choose to stop funding a particular service. AFAIK in France this responsibility rests with the regions.

I would guess that Britain may be pretty much unique in having the level of safeguards that we have in ensuring that passengers affected by a line or station closure are informed of the proposal and given an opportunity to object to the closure. In many other countries, if you are a user of a line or station that is proposed for closure, the onus is probably on you to find out about the proposal, for example through media reports, and to proactively approach your regional government representatives to make them aware of how the closure would affect you.
I suppose it helps that the UK has a unique combination of
- very little local control of railways, meaning decisions about the network are taken at a relatively high level
- very direct access to Ministers because they are all local MPs, meaning Ministers are far easier to lobby for local issues
- a nationwide obsession with railways that matches the dedication of the Japanese, but without the tendency of some Asian countries to have a greater acceptance of government decisions, meaning if the government proposes a station or line for closure they are all but guaranteed to have a fight on their hands from local communities
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top