http://www.fitlads.net/tmp/railtrack.pdf 
Here's a couple of choice entries:
Here's a couple of choice entries:
Ms Pauline McGillivray
Enforcement Officer
Development & Regeneration Services
Glasgow City Council
229 George Street
GLASGOW
G1 1QU
6th of October 2004
Dear Madam,
PLANNING ENFORCEMENT NOTICE
We refer to your letter of the 23rd ult (Ref: DC/PMG/02/00605/EN and 04/00673/EN).
We thank you for the copy of a letter which was sent to your Chief Executive and note your comments that you “are unsure whether this letter has been sent from your offices, however, as it does not appear to be on official headed paper, there is dubiety over whether the letter is genuine”.
Unlike your profligate council, we have no intention of running up a large print bill to produce “official headed paper”. You are clearly not used to the disciplines of the private sector where we have to count every penny in order to maintain shareholder value.
We also wonder what the not inconsiderable number of supporters of the Rangers Football Club in Glasgow think of your choices of colour? Green and yellow is surely a somewhat insensitive and possibly sectarian choice.
Yours sincerely,
J White
Secretary
Brethertons
Solicitors
16 Church Street
Rugby
CV21 3PW
14th of April 2005
Dear Sirs,
LIAM STUART NEIL
We refer to your letter of the 17th of February 2005 intimating a claim against us on behalf of the above named client and we apologise for the delay in replying.
We note your averment that your client was electrocuted after swinging his legs against the 25kV power line whilst he was on the ledge of a footbridge leading across the main Euston to Manchester railway line and that he subsequently fell into a coal train underneath.
We note that he has suffered very serious burns below the waist, a broken arm and a fractured skull, has had numerous operations and much time in hospital, that he will have to wear pressure dressings for a period of at least two years and undergo physiotherapy, and that he may be mentally affected by the accident and require the assistance of a psychologist.
We note your claim that we were negligent and in breach of a statutory duty of care to the public at large and in particular to your client. We repudiate this claim in its entirety.
You state that it was well known in the area that children played on the footbridge and claim that warning signs should have been erected and/or that the parapet should have been made higher or a cage should have been erected.
If it was so well known in the area that children played there, we would have thought that any prudent and caring parent would have instructed their children not to trespass on railway property. It would seem that Ms Gleston failed to do so. One can only hope that young Liam has received a salutary lesson on the dangers of railway trespass and will not seek to repeat the experience.
In passing, we should note that his interference with the 25kV power supply will undoubtedly have caused delay to trains and inconvenience to railway customers as a result. Whilst his landing on a railway customer’s coal thereby converting it to slack will also not have been without cost.
In view of the fact that your client was only 13 at the time of the incident, it is unlikely that any further action will be taken against him either in respect of his criminal trespass or the damage caused by him to the railway infrastructure. He and his mother should consider him lucky to be alive and not be seeking to extract damages from those who are not responsible in any way for the predicament in which he finds himself.
Yours faithfully,
J White
Secretary