The spare unit is currently full of building materials, so I doubt anything is going in there any time soon. It's been rumoured that the ticket office and Boots are swapping places, but I'm not sure how true that is!They have already closed so I doubt it. I think that spare unit might become home to Network Rails public reception.
The big question for me is: are they going to get rid of Boots and move the Ticket Office they're?
Im really hoping so, as it would allow the Southern concourse to be opened up and restored to its original length.
There's a copy of the plan on the Skyscraper City forums. I'm unsure of where it came from so can't provide a link to the source, only to that forum: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=330017&page=128
The project proposes other station improvements within the southern concourse which offer a much-improved passenger experience. These works do not require planning permission but for information include:
- New floor & wall finishes throughout, providing a clean and consistent appearance.
- New ticket gatelines will be located to relieve congestion on the platform areas
- New CIS and Information/Assisted Travel Point will support a more intuitive passenger journey.
- Refurbishment Public WCs and the Network Rail reception will provide vital operational improvements.
with a new retail unit taking the place of where the ATM was.
Only one cashpoint working on the concourse this morning - and a very long queue.
Some work has begun at the end of P1, with a section at the end completely removed. I presume this is prep work for building P0.
I presume you're talking about that modern canopy? If so...great to hear!
With NPR and HS2 coming to the station, why have they ruled out a parallel station design for some highspeed platforms as some conventional platforms. Surely HS2 is going to bulldoze quite a few buildings in the area so why not maximize capacity on the footprint and make it an entirely new HS station to the south of the existing one? Any enhancements to the existing station can then be made with a new firm design in mind?
Probably because HS2 approaches from the south-east and turning onto an east-west alignment would require making a big loop to the west (as the Woodlesford line does) or to the east of the station. Being longer this would cost more, extend the journey time and involve more demolition in the centre.With NPR and HS2 coming to the station, why have they ruled out a parallel station design for some highspeed platforms as some conventional platforms. Surely HS2 is going to bulldoze quite a few buildings in the area so why not maximize capacity on the footprint and make it an entirely new HS station to the south of the existing one? Any enhancements to the existing station can then be made with a new firm design in mind?
If plans go ahead as....planned, will Leeds be a unique station in having a set of platforms at right angles to another set of platforms? A 'T' station so to speak.

Ah but do the platforms actually meet at right angles? It looks from the map that the lines just cross each other after the stations?Just a slightly larger version of Liskeard![]()
Probably because HS2 approaches from the south-east and turning onto an east-west alignment would require making a big loop to the west (as the Woodlesford line does) or to the east of the station. Being longer this would cost more, extend the journey time and involve more demolition in the centre.

I wouldn't have said it would cost that much more, but obviously a lot more than using the existing lines as planned. Below is a screenshot of the HS2 Interactive Map with my line drawn in blue of what would be needed for it to approach from the East, about 5km according to Google Maps.
View attachment 57866
Why would you simply not just widen the existing alignment, that HS2 is already using and approach the station in the usual way, much like many LGVs do in France?
I wouldn't have said it would cost that much more, but obviously a lot more than using the existing lines as planned. Below is a screenshot of the HS2 Interactive Map with my line drawn in blue of what would be needed for it to approach from the East, about 5km according to Google Maps.
View attachment 57866
Here is the 'City Metric' article where I read about the idea of bringing in more trains from the East to free up capacity in the West.
City Metric / Here's how to fix the Leeds railway network / 14th September 2017. https://www.citymetric.com/transport/here-s-how-fix-leeds-railway-network-3328
Personally because I would also have HS2 carry on to Liverpool via Manchester as NPHR although not quite as fast as 250 mph. I don't see why really should stop in Leeds, although with its own individual station it certainly won't impact much upon the existing network.
I wouldn't have said it would cost that much more, but obviously a lot more than using the existing lines as planned. Below is a screenshot of the HS2 Interactive Map with my line drawn in blue of what would be needed for it to approach from the East, about 5km according to Google Maps.
View attachment 57866
I don't think NPR is going to happen. The idea of the Tories funding it is laughable, not enough votes in it and they are losing economic credibility by the day despite the fact that used to be about the only thing theu had going for them (I know some will disagree on even that). They are not to be trusted on the north and are being taken over my free market fundamentalists. Look at the total inaction over Northern Rail
It would need an expensive flying junction somewhere between Woodlesford and Leeds, not to mention the capacity issues and the need to fit the 150s with ERTMS! Far more expensive than doing something about the inadequay of the existing platform 17. If NPR comes to pass there would probably be a flying junction going the other way in the same area, so NPR trains from Sheffield could use part of HS2 but terminate in the southern side of the existing station or new platforms next to it (or continue towards York).Hmm - this has got me thinking - could the Woodlesford services be diverted into the HS2 platforms? That'd free up four services per hour in the existing station - even if it'd be strange to see a Sheffield-bound 150 sat along the four hundred metre London services!



Note that the first footprint mostly covers nondescript low-rise buildings, probably dating back to the 80s and 90s. Your proposed alternative covers some much newer buildings including apartment towers.Leed's HS2 station will already require some extensive demolition to the south of the station as shown in the outline view below...