• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Keolis Amey Wales - Future Rolling Stock

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,990
The old "Westminster won't give us enough money" excuse, already wearing thin, has a big hole in now the Welsh Government have their own tax-raising powers (Land transaction and landfill now, income tax from April for example).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

hwl

Established Member
Joined
5 Feb 2012
Messages
8,258
I might have missed this but how is the CAF and Stadler stock being financed?
Are they looking for a ROSCO? Is a WG loan funding it? Or is the franchisee financing it direct given the much longer than normal franchise period?

I assume the MK4s, 170s will remain normal ROSCO and 230s one of Vivarail options?
 

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
Indeed - blaming Arriva and/or Westminster for everything that goes wrong into the new franchise will only get them so far.

I imagine its all honey moon time with Keolis Amey / Welsh Government at the moment about the "big plans" and how wonderful it will all be (eventually) however once Christmas comes and there's very little sign of improvements and people start asking questions it could be different especially if TfW/WG try and pass the buck to Kelois about the non appearance of the 769's (somewhere back up thread we found something from WG saying cover for PRM Mods was the new franchise holders responsibility).
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
I imagine its all honey moon time with Keolis Amey / Welsh Government at the moment about the "big plans" and how wonderful it will all be (eventually) however once Christmas comes and there's very little sign of improvements and people start asking questions it could be different especially if TfW/WG try and pass the buck to Kelois about the non appearance of the 769's (somewhere back up thread we found something from WG saying cover for PRM Mods was the new franchise holders responsibility).

Due to the timescales now available, the PRM Mods should have been started long ago.
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,652
Location
South Wales
Due to the timescales now available, the PRM Mods should have been started long ago.
The timescales now seem impossible. How on earth can 36 x 150/2s and nearly all of Wales' 158s be fully modified in 15 months without causing huge service disruption and short formations?
 

Dai Corner

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2015
Messages
6,990
The timescales now seem impossible. How on earth can 36 x 150/2s and nearly all of Wales' 158s be fully modified in 15 months without causing huge service disruption and short formations?

I'm not sure there's workshop capacity available even if they could be released from service.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
According to this post in the Northern Pacer withdrawal thread:

Northern Pacer Withdrawals - Info?

This makes sense given the non-existence of the 769s, which Welsh Govt contributed £1.9 million towards and ATW £1 million.

What's the point in Wales waiting for 769s now?
Presumably, the power to grant PRM derogation still lies with the UK government, so there is no guarantee one would be granted if KeolisAmey wanted to retain Pacers. Bringing in some 144s until Dec 2019 would help provide cover for 150s to have PRM mods, but the ex-Anglia 170s plus 5 class 230s is only 17 units; not enough to replace 30 Pacers (I'm not counting the extra 153s from GWR as they are for extra capacity and (presumably) are themselves non-PRM so cannot be used alone to allow replacement of Pacers). The 4-car 769s, with the potential to replace PAIRS of Pacers seem to be essential to getting a PRM-compliant fleet. Shame the 5x class 156s due off-lease from Scotrail don't appear to be Porterbrook units, otherwise WAG should say to Porterbrook 'look we gave you £2m now give us those 156s if you can't manage to give us the 769s' (but I suppose those particularly 156s may not have had PRM mods anyway).

And that's before you have to find stock for the new Halton curve service...
 

Cardiff123

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2013
Messages
1,652
Location
South Wales
Presumably, the power to grant PRM derogation still lies with the UK government, so there is no guarantee one would be granted if KeolisAmey wanted to retain Pacers. Bringing in some 144s until Dec 2019 would help provide cover for 150s to have PRM mods, but the ex-Anglia 170s plus 5 class 230s is only 17 units; not enough to replace 30 Pacers (I'm not counting the extra 153s from GWR as they are for extra capacity and (presumably) are themselves non-PRM so cannot be used alone to allow replacement of Pacers). The 4-car 769s, with the potential to replace PAIRS of Pacers seem to be essential to getting a PRM-compliant fleet. Shame the 5x class 156s due off-lease from Scotrail don't appear to be Porterbrook units, otherwise WAG should say to Porterbrook 'look we gave you £2m now give us those 156s if you can't manage to give us the 769s' (but I suppose those particularly 156s may not have had PRM mods anyway).

And that's before you have to find stock for the new Halton curve service...
Obviously 769s are preferable over continued use of Pacers, I can't wait to see Pacers head to the scrapyard, but will Wales ever get 769s? Northern are in the queue before us and I've even read that GWR have been bumped up the queue in front of us, pushing Wales to the bottom.
Continued use of 143s and 144s is better than no extra trains at all.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
will Wales ever get 769s? Northern are in the queue before us and I've even read that GWR have been bumped up the queue in front of us, pushing Wales to the bottom.
That's insane; the 769s for Wales are supposed to be covering for 150s to have MANDITORY work done. If anything Wales should leap-frog Northern in the queue for 769s (assuming that Northern is not in a similar predicament, which they probably are). GWR, on the other hand, are just shuffling stock around to make use of different depots; why can't they just take on the Heathrow Express units and run them out of Reading depot until Wales and Northern have all the 769s they ordered? 769s would be a new type for Reading depot just as Heathrow Express units would be. Thus, in the short-term (before the 769s were supposed to move to displace the diesel 166s/165s) there's no difference is there?

Continued use of 143s and 144s is better than no extra trains at all.
Indeed, but would the UK government allow it?
 
Last edited:

daikilo

Established Member
Joined
2 Feb 2010
Messages
1,623
We need to worry, if fuel prices continue to rise, a lack of 769s will be small fry in figting overcrowding.
 

PHILIPE

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Nov 2011
Messages
13,472
Location
Caerphilly
Obviously 769s are preferable over continued use of Pacers, I can't wait to see Pacers head to the scrapyard, but will Wales ever get 769s? Northern are in the queue before us and I've even read that GWR have been bumped up the queue in front of us, pushing Wales to the bottom.
Continued use of 143s and 144s is better than no extra trains at all.

GWR may get them as 319s and run over electrified lines to speed up the process with the Heathrow Express
 

anamyd

Established Member
Joined
17 Aug 2018
Messages
3,038
I thought of 400 because the Sheffield city links are 399s your probably right.

4xx series are third rail units. Hence why the 450 is the third rail version of the 350, for example.

I think 152 is still "reserved" for the cancelled 156 single car conversion. I was thinking 197 or 196/3 and 196/4 a bit like the 170 numbering scheme for the Civitys. I'd be very surprised if the 6xx 2011 extension DMU series was ever used, what with DMUs not going to be made forever and 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 198, 199 etc classes all being unused.
 

uxm

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2018
Messages
197
4xx series are third rail units. Hence why the 450 is the third rail version of the 350, for example.

I think 152 is still "reserved" for the cancelled 156 single car conversion. I was thinking 197 or 196/3 and 196/4 a bit like the 170 numbering scheme for the Civitys. I'd be very surprised if the 6xx 2011 extension DMU series was ever used, what with DMUs not going to be made forever and 190, 191, 192, 193, 194, 198, 199 etc classes all being unused.
I saw on an article about new trains coming to Wales and CAF said "West Midlands trains also have the same trains on order" So they're getting the same civitys as west midlands?
 

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
I saw on an article about new trains coming to Wales and CAF said "West Midlands trains also have the same trains on order" So they're getting the same civitys as west midlands?

No the Civity is a platform- the internal fitment is a choice of the customer. For Norhern their specifically for their Northern Connect services so will run as limited stop Regional Express services serving large centers of population in the North not covered by TPE. For West Midlands Trains there predominantly for outer suburban services ie. Shrewsbury to Birmingham New St & Worcester-Birmingham Snow Hill- Stratford Upon Avon so these two operators can choose their fitment to suite there homogeneous usage.

KeolisAmey however will be using there's for a multiplicity of purposes.
Bangor to Manchester Airport is a limited stop Regional Express service from North Wales/Cheshire into Manchester and its serves the airport likewise on the Cambrian its a limited stop Regional Express service from Mid Wales/Shropshire into Birmingham that serves the airport as well. However due to the commitment to retain through trains from Pwllheli they will also have to do multiple short gaps between stops rural work as they will on the Conwy Valley and * Crewe to Shrewsbury stopper. The Liverpool to Llandudno/Shrewsbury services are more akin to outer suburban.

The second batch of Civity's with First Class will almost be exclusively for Manchester to Swansea limited stop services.

KeolisAmey have the lead time to get the internal fitment right. The bulk of their use will be long distance regional express type services so at least 50% tables, window alignment and plenty of luggage space are requirements. The 1/3 2/3 door arrangement will give them the space to load standing passengers in better on peak trains out of Manchester/Birmingham/Cardiff for the first/last 20 minutes. They can concentrate on getting the internal layout right for the longer distance passengers without worrying to cram seats in for short distance commuters.
 

uxm

Member
Joined
1 Sep 2018
Messages
197
No the Civity is a platform- the internal fitment is a choice of the customer. For Norhern their specifically for their Northern Connect services so will run as limited stop Regional Express services serving large centers of population in the North not covered by TPE. For West Midlands Trains there predominantly for outer suburban services ie. Shrewsbury to Birmingham New St & Worcester-Birmingham Snow Hill- Stratford Upon Avon so these two operators can choose their fitment to suite there homogeneous usage.

KeolisAmey however will be using there's for a multiplicity of purposes.
Bangor to Manchester Airport is a limited stop Regional Express service from North Wales/Cheshire into Manchester and its serves the airport likewise on the Cambrian its a limited stop Regional Express service from Mid Wales/Shropshire into Birmingham that serves the airport as well. However due to the commitment to retain through trains from Pwllheli they will also have to do multiple short gaps between stops rural work as they will on the Conwy Valley and * Crewe to Shrewsbury stopper. The Liverpool to Llandudno/Shrewsbury services are more akin to outer suburban.

The second batch of Civity's with First Class will almost be exclusively for Manchester to Swansea limited stop services.

KeolisAmey have the lead time to get the internal fitment right. The bulk of their use will be long distance regional express type services so at least 50% tables, window alignment and plenty of luggage space are requirements. The 1/3 2/3 door arrangement will give them the space to load standing passengers in better on peak trains out of Manchester/Birmingham/Cardiff for the first/last 20 minutes. They can concentrate on getting the internal layout right for the longer distance passengers without worrying to cram seats in for short distance commuters.
We've haven't seen the interior of the long distance civity yet , we've seen the interior of the civity that is a stopper and has no tables and iron board seats. Hopefully the long distance version will have better seats and more tables.
 

Wivenswold

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2012
Messages
1,570
Location
Essex
All but one of the 2 car GA 170's are off lease 1st October 2019 based on the current updated Franchise Agreement.

So seeing one before that date is rather dependent on how the Class 755s settle down.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
Realistically the 197(?)s replacing the 175s would need to have interiors matching or exceeding that spec. On routes as long and with inter-station times as long as on the Manchester - Cardiff/Milford Haven services they really need to be proper long-distance interiors.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,859
I saw on an article about new trains coming to Wales and CAF said "West Midlands trains also have the same trains on order" So they're getting the same civitys as west midlands?
No the Civity is a platform- the internal fitment is a choice of the customer. For Norhern their specifically for their Northern Connect services so will run as limited stop Regional Express services serving large centers of population in the North not covered by TPE. For West Midlands Trains there predominantly for outer suburban services ie. Shrewsbury to Birmingham New St & Worcester-Birmingham Snow Hill- Stratford Upon Avon so these two operators can choose their fitment to suite there homogeneous usage.
Have any interior pictures of the West Midlands Trains class 196 been released? Given the very spartan interior suggested in the published interior pictures of the W&B Civitys, they could well be the same as the West Midlands fleet. Certainly the exterior pictures of both fleets look like they could be a single design perhaps with very minor interior variations. On that basis, assuming the West Midlands fleet will be 196/0 and 196/1 the W&B units could be 196/2 (2-car units) and 196/3 (3-car units).

KeolisAmey however will be using there's for a multiplicity of purposes.
Bangor to Manchester Airport is a limited stop Regional Express service from North Wales/Cheshire into Manchester and its serves the airport likewise on the Cambrian its a limited stop Regional Express service from Mid Wales/Shropshire into Birmingham that serves the airport as well.
Yet they have not published any pictures of a regional express train; only suburban ones with wide doors making lots and lots of standing room. I think this looks like another Thameslink; passengers making long journeys (eg. Bedford to Brighton in Thameslink's case) have to do it on a Metro train.

KeolisAmey have the lead time to get the internal fitment right. The bulk of their use will be long distance regional express type services so at least 50% tables, window alignment and plenty of luggage space are requirements. The 1/3 2/3 door arrangement will give them the space to load standing passengers in better on peak trains out of Manchester/Birmingham/Cardiff for the first/last 20 minutes. They can concentrate on getting the internal layout right for the longer distance passengers without worrying to cram seats in for short distance commuters.
I agree that the bulk of the work for the new W&B CAF fleet will be long-distance regional express services, and therefore feel that the 1/3, 2/3 door arrangment (which would only be suitable on a tiny proportion of the planned Civity routes) is a case of the tail wagging the dog. It shouldn't matter that a train is leaving a big city at peak time; if a large number passengers will be travelling for over 15 minutes then the train should be long enough to ensure they all have a comfortable seat. The extra standing room provided by the suburabn door layout should not be necessary on regional express services.

Realistically the 197(?)s replacing the 175s would need to have interiors matching or exceeding that spec. On routes as long and with inter-station times as long as on the Manchester - Cardiff/Milford Haven services they really need to be proper long-distance interiors.
Not just the 175s but the 158s as well, and to meet the same spec the doors need to be narrower so space isn't lost to standing room. Instead of the proposed all-suburban fleet (let's call them 196/2 and 196/3 as suggested above) I think the Civity's should be three or four types:
  • class 196/3 (3-car) (for Liverpool-Llandudno, Cardiff-Shrewsbury stoppers (if such a thing happens) and Liverpool-Shrewsbury stoppers (ditto))
  • class 197 (2-car) with narrow doors at the vehicle ends (like the 397s, but with the cabs from the 196 and the doors right at the ends of the driving vehicles like they are on the class 397 intermediate cars)
  • class 197 (3-car) as above with the 2-car 197s but with an intermediate vehicle similar to a 397
  • possibly class 196/2 (2-car) for Llandudno-Holyhead stoppers (allowing the Birmingham and Cardiff services to have fewer calls west of Llandudno Junction) and maybe the Shrewsbury-Crewe shuttle
None of these should have the ironing board seats and at least a few table bays should be available on the 196s, increasing to about half of each coach on the 197s.

Incidently are any side-view drawings of the new CAF units (like this for class 360s) available online?
 

Gareth Marston

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2010
Messages
6,231
Location
Newtown Montgomeryshire
Have any interior pictures of the West Midlands Trains class 196 been released? Given the very spartan interior suggested in the published interior pictures of the W&B Civitys, they could well be the same as the West Midlands fleet. Certainly the exterior pictures of both fleets look like they could be a single design perhaps with very minor interior variations. On that basis, assuming the West Midlands fleet will be 196/0 and 196/1 the W&B units could be 196/2 (2-car units) and 196/3 (3-car units).

Yet they have not published any pictures of a regional express train; only suburban ones with wide doors making lots and lots of standing room. I think this looks like another Thameslink; passengers making long journeys (eg. Bedford to Brighton in Thameslink's case) have to do it on a Metro train.

I agree that the bulk of the work for the new W&B CAF fleet will be long-distance regional express services, and therefore feel that the 1/3, 2/3 door arrangment (which would only be suitable on a tiny proportion of the planned Civity routes) is a case of the tail wagging the dog. It shouldn't matter that a train is leaving a big city at peak time; if a large number passengers will be travelling for over 15 minutes then the train should be long enough to ensure they all have a comfortable seat. The extra standing room provided by the suburabn door layout should not be necessary on regional express services.

Not just the 175s but the 158s as well, and to meet the same spec the doors need to be narrower so space isn't lost to standing room. Instead of the proposed all-suburban fleet (let's call them 196/2 and 196/3 as suggested above) I think the Civity's should be three or four types:
  • class 196/3 (3-car) (for Liverpool-Llandudno, Cardiff-Shrewsbury stoppers (if such a thing happens) and Liverpool-Shrewsbury stoppers (ditto))
  • class 197 (2-car) with narrow doors at the vehicle ends (like the 397s, but with the cabs from the 196 and the doors right at the ends of the driving vehicles like they are on the class 397 intermediate cars)
  • class 197 (3-car) as above with the 2-car 197s but with an intermediate vehicle similar to a 397
  • possibly class 196/2 (2-car) for Llandudno-Holyhead stoppers (allowing the Birmingham and Cardiff services to have fewer calls west of Llandudno Junction) and maybe the Shrewsbury-Crewe shuttle
None of these should have the ironing board seats and at least a few table bays should be available on the 196s, increasing to about half of each coach on the 197s.

Incidently are any side-view drawings of the new CAF units (like this for class 360s) available online?

Your going nowhere on your hobby horse about door positioning - there all going to be 1/2 & 2/3 and that's it.

Ive traveled on Chiltern 168' s a lot and apart from space for heavy & qty amounts of luggage they've been really good for the c 2 hour trips I've done on them. The First Class sections on the TPE Class 185's I like also- your segregated off from the standard section. If you want 'higher quality" long distance travel in Wales and Borders you've got the option of the Mark 4's from North Wales to Cardiff and 1st class sections on Manchester to Swansea. The volume of people making 2 and a quarter plus hour journeys without that choice will be relatively small versus the volume of people going into and out of Cardiff/Birmingham/Manchester/Liverpool on sub 1 hour trips.

Providing the internal layout - window alignment / table ratio /luggage provision are OK it shouldn't be a problem.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I'm not sure about that. The colour scheme is a bit bland and I can't tell if they're carpeted from that image but the layout itself looks fine to me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top