• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Jubilee Cities Announced

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
If what you say is correct (I dont know) then yes it is deserving.I never said Leicester wasnt deserving though.
As for more deserving? Well they are both historically cities. Just one is older than the other. So wouldnt say more deserving no.

bb21 is correct. Further to this point, Lancaster has only been a city for 75 years.

I have to admit, I never knew Leicester was even a city until you mentioned it! Ive always gone round calling it a town:o

Considering its substantial size? :shock:

History as far as city status goes. St Asaph is historically a city. Is Chelmsford? I may be wrong, but i never thought it had been a city.

Prior to the Diamond Jubilee award, Chelmsford had never been a city.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Considering its substantial size? :shock:

I never saw it as that large!
Going up the MML, Sheffield and perhaps Derby, yes, but never saw Leicester as a city. Never called it a city. Is there anyway of coding this so that BB21 cant read it?!:lol:
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
18,051
Location
Reston City Centre
I have to admit, I never knew Leicester was even a city until you mentioned it! Ive always gone round calling it a town:o

Considering its substantial size? :shock:

I never saw it as that large!
Going up the MML, Sheffield and perhaps Derby, yes, but never saw Leicester as a city. Never called it a city. Is there anyway of coding this so that BB21 cant read it?!:lol:

Not a Leicester City fan then?
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
It maybe should be pointed out that Leicester in terms of population is the tenth largest in the country, only just behind Manchester; and in terms of area is twelfth largest, bigger than Stoke, Cardiff, Coventry and Bradford.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,449
I never saw it as that large!
Going up the MML, Sheffield and perhaps Derby, yes, but never saw Leicester as a city. Never called it a city. Is there anyway of coding this so that BB21 cant read it?!:lol:

Haha, I don't blame ye. Leicester does seem to be overlooked in many people's eyes.

To outsiders without reference to the relevant statistics, who would have thought that population-wise, Leicester is quite a long way ahead of Nottingham. Derby has only been a city since 1977, and Leicestershire has more universities than any immediately surrounding counties (!). Our two northern neighbours both only came onto the centre stage very recently.

Leicestershire's ancient history is not something that gets brandied a lot in the national media. Not many people will be aware that Leicester was a city even in Roman times, then lost it, then regained it, pretty much what St Asaph went through. Not many people would be aware that Loughborough's annual street fair dates back to 1228 and had never been interrupted rain or shine.

It is fascinating sometimes when you delve into a city's past.
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Haha, I don't blame ye. Leicester does seem to be overlooked in many people's eyes.

To outsiders without reference to the relevant statistics, who would have thought that population-wise, Leicester is quite a long way ahead of Nottingham. Derby has only been a city since 1977, and Leicestershire has more universities than any immediately surrounding counties (!). Our two northern neighbours both only came onto the centre stage very recently.

Leicestershire's ancient history is not something that gets brandied a lot in the national media. Not many people will be aware that Leicester was a city even in Roman times, then lost it, then regained it, pretty much what St Asaph went through. Not many people would be aware that Loughborough's annual street fair dates back to 1228 and had never been interrupted rain or shine.

It is fascinating sometimes when you delve into a city's past.

All those in favour of revoking Leicester as a city, and transferring it to Loughborough?<D
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
bb21 is correct. Further to this point, Lancaster has only been a city for 75 years.

Which is daft! Lancaster should always have been a city:lol:
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Not a Leicester City fan then?

Nooooo. Only decent teams need apply for that honour:lol:
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Not a Leicester City fan then?
Nooooo. Only decent teams need apply for that honour:lol:

Leicester are a "decent team".

They have won what is currently the Championship the second highest number of times (behind only Manchester City), have reached 4 FA Cup Finals and also finished 2nd in the League before now. Most importantly, they have won the League Cup three times.

Until 2008, they had also never played outside the top two divisions.
 

junglejames

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2010
Messages
2,069
Leicester are a "decent team".

They have won what is currently the Championship the second highest number of times (behind only Manchester City),

Compared to a team that has never been outside the top division since the war;)
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Compared to a team that has never been outside the top division since the war;)

Yes, OK :roll:

Considering there is only one such club though, that's somewhat difficult to beat. Even my team, the top division's most regular attendees, have only been on their current run since 1954 - and even then almost blew it (twice) during the 90s.

Leicester are still a decent team though. No shame in following them. (Unless sacking Sven counts.)
 

Badger

Member
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Messages
617
Location
Wolverhampton
Having lived here for three years I hate Leicester, but it is definately a city, far moreso than Wolverhampton or even Derby. It's incredibly run down though. DMU are going a long way to fix that but not really far enough and they aren't treading out of their zone; there are some horrible areas of the city. Also the bus service is awful.
 

bb21

Emeritus Moderator
Joined
4 Feb 2010
Messages
24,449
[Anti-Arriva mode]What do you expect? Arriva run a large number of the local services.[/Anti-Arriva mode]

No, no, no. You got that one all wrong. Arriva didn't cut provision of evening services on a majority of its routes to finish at 1900. Arriva are awful, but nowhere near the bottom of the barrel in our fine city.
 

cuccir

Established Member
Joined
18 Nov 2009
Messages
3,694
(although for footballing reasons I would of given it to MK)

WHAT?

I can't believe no-one has pulled you up on this comment.

Milton Keynes DOES NOT HAVE A FOOTBALL TEAM. It stole Wimbledon's.

I am not a Wimbledon fan, but people seem to be forgetting that MK Dons have no right to be considered a football team. They can never be forgive and a pox on anyone in Milton Keynes who goes to their matches. For that reason alone, MK should never be a city.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top