DarloRich
Veteran Member
This is certainly one of the odder threads I’ve encountered lately. It’s literally the very essence of a non-story, with certain people trying very hard to make it into a story. I’ll leave it at that.
Indeed - EXCLUSIVE: man travels on train
What relevance does that have?
A poster said that “going around without security isn’t really an option”. You said the Queen can manage it. I pointed out that’s not the case. The Queen most certainly does have security, everywhere she goes. Even on a train.
It’s simply plain wrong for people to suggest Corbyn wouldn’t have security arrangements if he ever became prime minister. It’s worrying how people on this thread have such a lack of objectivity.
Exactly. he is a senior politician. I would be very surprised if there wasn't an aide and a security man with him.
Corbyn is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Today we've got the Sunday Express slagging him off and calling him a hypocrite for using a Government (diesel) car, which he was advised to do for security reasons. When he does travel by public transport he gets accused of not trying hard enough to find a seat so the he can stand and make a political point. Anyway, if the right-wing press are to believed then Corbyn is probably the safest man in the UK from being attacked as they still claim that he is a "friend of the IRA / Hezbollah / Hamas / insert just about any terrorist group here...".![]()
he is friend of all of those people so he should be safe from them. He might not, however, be safe from the crackpots we seem to be breading in large numbers in this country who seem to take the fact that they disagree with a politicians politics as carte blanche for having a swing ( or worse) at them.