• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is the Heathrow Express a viable, worthwhile service?

Status
Not open for further replies.

HSTEd

Veteran Member
Joined
14 Jul 2011
Messages
20,292
It seems Crossrail is bleeding away Heathrow Express's passenger base - which is not really surprising.

Given that open access operators do not, for the most part, come close to actually paying their costs, we do have to consider whether running trains with nine people per carriage on average is really a sensible use of taxpayers money.
(Once Network Rail subsidies are accounted for, there seems little chance HEx is actually paying the real costs).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,320
Location
Reading
Heathrow Express is not an Open Access operator as defined in the 1993 Railways Act as it predates privatisation. It was set up as a joint venture between BR and BAA plc following approval by the government in July 1988. It was planned to open in 1993.

Apparently Heathrow Express and its airport infrastructure count as part of Heathrow's Regulated Asset Base and so has an influence on the landing charges payable by Heathrow's airline customers. It is important for Heathrow that it continues to operate.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,969
Location
London
It seems Crossrail is bleeding away Heathrow Express's passenger base - which is not really surprising.

Given that open access operators do not, for the most part, come close to actually paying their costs, we do have to consider whether running trains with nine people per carriage on average is really a sensible use of taxpayers money.
(Once Network Rail subsidies are accounted for, there seems little chance HEx is actually paying the real costs).

Ultimately this is down to whether HAL want to continue to pay for it and the subsequent paths and clearly at present they do.

It would require some intervention from Network Rail if they wanted to say "no, the 4tph Main Line paths from Paddington could be better utilised".
 

John R

Established Member
Joined
1 Jul 2013
Messages
6,095
Ultimately this is down to whether HAL want to continue to pay for it and the subsequent paths and clearly at present they do.

It would require some intervention from Network Rail if they wanted to say "no, the 4tph Main Line paths from Paddington could be better utilised".
HEx ‘s track access rights are only until 2028 I believe. After that I suspect all bets are off.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,969
Location
London
HEx ‘s track access rights are only until 2028 I believe. After that I suspect all bets are off.

Well yes in the short-term nothing changes but will be interesting how it goes in the future.

The thing is Heathrow Airport probably should support at least 8tph or maintain the 10tph it has at the moment (6 from T5, [4 HEX, 2EL] & 4 from T4) however the Relief Lines are at capacity.

So you would need to run the trains fast and then into the Elizabeth line core (which means crossing the entirety of Ladbroke Grove regularly, a potential performance risk) or the Elizabeth line takes over the service but still terminating at Paddington which makes no real sense. Then there's whether HAL want to relinquish a service over the infrastructure they run, which is an unknown. So there's no easy solution although there have been other threads on this subject too.
 

cslusarc

Member
Joined
27 Jan 2011
Messages
167
I think the Heathrow Express can be a valuable & worthwhile service if it can freeze it's fares to stimulate demand.
 

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
728
Location
Suburban London
What I am about to say has to be treated as an uncorroborated rumour - although discussions in this thread (and in other threads) point towards this being a viable possibility.

One of my brothers is* travelling home from Heathrow, he has a through ticket to his home in Kent and decided that it would be 'least hassle' to avoid the Heathrow Express and instead catch an Elizabeth line train to Stratford, and then go to International for the SouthEastern HighSpeed.

He was speaking with someone else on the train who told him that someone who he knows who works on the railway had told him, that the Heathrow Express service is likely to be withdrawn, to create more paths for Eiizabeth line trains.

*At the time of writing this message is is indeed on an eastbound Lizzie train.

I can understand him avoiding the Heathrow Express, as otherwise he would also have to change trains at Paddington. But I do not know why he is alighting from the Elizabeth line train at Stratford rather than Farringdon. Not that either option is easier, as they both will require him to catch another train to reach the High Speed.

Sharing for interest

Simon
 

michael8

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2021
Messages
236
Location
UK
I do like the idea of HEX as an express premium service. I wonder if XR takes some paths, perhaps the additional paths could follow the service pattern of HEX ?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,838
Location
East Anglia
I do like the idea of HEX as an express premium service. I wonder if XR takes some paths, perhaps the additional paths could follow the service pattern of HEX ?

Would that not cause unnecessary conflicting moves on the approaches to Paddington?
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,969
Location
London
Would that not cause unnecessary conflicting moves on the approaches to Paddington?

Yes.

There’s no more paths on the Relief Lines so that service is out of the question.

Running on the Main Lines fast would a) need an eastern terminus and b) lead to regular moves across the Paddington throat / Ladbroke Grove.

345s are also limited to 90 so the pathing would be even worse.

HeX has the money to continue the service at a loss for some time.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,524
HeX has the money to continue the service at a loss for some time.

Point of order - I’m not aware of any figures suggesting HEx operates at a loss.

That said, Heathrow Airport does indeed have the money to run the service at a loss indefinitely; as the value of the service to the airport is not in the cash it returns; as has been stated by those in the know on this (and other) threads many times.
 

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
809
Could it be at all possible to extend 4 shenfield-Paddington terminators to Heathrow and run fast?
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
19,838
Location
East Anglia
Yes.

There’s no more paths on the Relief Lines so that service is out of the question.

Running on the Main Lines fast would a) need an eastern terminus and b) lead to regular moves across the Paddington throat / Ladbroke Grove.

345s are also limited to 90 so the pathing would be even worse.

HeX has the money to continue the service at a loss for some time.

Cheers. They seemed the obvious answers.
 

Horizon22

Established Member
Associate Staff
Jobs & Careers
Joined
8 Sep 2019
Messages
10,969
Location
London
Point of order - I’m not aware of any figures suggesting HEx operates at a loss.

That said, Heathrow Airport does indeed have the money to run the service at a loss indefinitely; as the value of the service to the airport is not in the cash it returns; as has been stated by those in the know on this (and other) threads many times.

Yes the latter is more what I meant!

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Could it be at all possible to extend 4 shenfield-Paddington terminators to Heathrow and run fast?

Theoretically yes. Would likely to be a wider rejig though with a mix of Abbey Wood & Shenfield as destinations from T5. Canary Wharf Group would certainly lobby for the direct train back after it ran for a year or so.
 

simple simon

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2011
Messages
728
Location
Suburban London
re: ending the HeX service, I am not sure that passengers will welcome the loss of service from the mainline station. Especially those who travel to Paddington via road transport (bus, taxi etc).

Also, some passengers may welcome the non-stop service, seeing it as more restful than a service that calls at several intermediate station.

But, the direct through service to many other parts of London does give the Elizabeth line a competitive edge.

As for Paddington terminators, many will be needed for the service to OOC.
 

JN114

Established Member
Joined
28 Jun 2005
Messages
3,524
re: ending the HeX service, I am not sure that passengers will welcome the loss of service from the mainline station. Especially those who travel to Paddington via road transport (bus, taxi etc).

Also, some passengers may welcome the non-stop service, seeing it as more restful than a service that calls at several intermediate station.

But, the direct through service to many other parts of London does give the Elizabeth line a competitive edge.

As for Paddington terminators, many will be needed for the service to OOC.

They needn’t worry

It isn’t happening
 

ijmad

Established Member
Joined
7 Jan 2016
Messages
1,855
Location
UK
Surely stopping the HeX at Old Oak Common might actually make HeX more attractive and sustainable long term.

Any passenger coming in on HS2 or the GWML would have a quicker journey if they change there. It's likely gonna be a nicer, easier change compared to Paddington.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
78,269
Location
Yorkshire
... someone who he knows who works on the railway had told him, that the Heathrow Express service is likely to be withdrawn, to create more paths for Elizabeth line trains...
That person isn't as knowledgeable as numerous forum members, who have ruled it out, for reasons stated above.

Working on the railway could mean almost any job, and almost any level/grade. I personally wouldn't take particular note of anything that a random person who works on the railway says, unless it came from a manager or reputable source.
Surely stopping the HeX at Old Oak Common might actually make HeX more attractive and sustainable long term.

Any passenger coming in on HS2 or the GWML would have a quicker journey if they change there. It's likely gonna be a nicer, easier change compared to Paddington.
Check out this thread:

Not only will the station offer journeys on HS2, it is being built with connections to GWR, Elizabeth Line, and Heathrow Express services. It will be the 42nd stop on London’s new Elizabeth line enabling passengers to get to the West End in 10 minutes, Liverpool Street Station in 20 minutes and Heathrow, via either the Elizabeth Line or the Heathrow Express, also in 10 minutes. This once industrial area is being transformed into a thriving super-connected neighbourhood and building a legacy for generations to come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top