• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Is a more expensive routed ticket always valid via a cheaper route?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
Say only one company runs the more expensive via route do they get all the money or does a % go to the another company just in case customer chooses to travel the cheaper via option?
This is down to the division of revenue via the ex-BR system called ORCATS. There have been plenty of previous threads on that subject on the forum; full details of the workings of ORCATS aren't public, but from leaks through the years we have a reasonable approximate idea of how it works.

However, the division of revenue between different TOCs has nothing to do with the validity of a ticket. That is determined solely by the details of the ticket (origin, destination, route, ticket type, discount type (if any), price).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

woody505

Member
Joined
6 May 2014
Messages
111
Was aware of ocrats just wondered hypothetical u have two routes too choose from both say valid by only is ocrats clever enough to split the revenue up fairly if you buy the higher price ticket and then travel via the cheaper route will the the cheaper route train operating company see any of the ticket money for transporting you
 

ForTheLoveOf

Established Member
Joined
7 Oct 2017
Messages
6,416
Was aware of ocrats just wondered hypothetical u have two routes too choose from both say valid by only is ocrats clever enough to split the revenue up fairly if you buy the higher price ticket and then travel via the cheaper route will the the cheaper route train operating company see any of the ticket money for transporting you
No, ORCATS will stick to the "printed" route restriction. Hence, for operators who operate along slower routes (e.g. Northern for Manchester to Leeds via Hebden Bridge), it is slightly more advantageous for the default route to be "Any Permitted" than "via X", as there is a chance they will get some of the revenue. Of course, in most cases, they don't control both routes and it would be questionable for them to collaborate with the fare setter of the "via X" fare to change it to "Any Permitted" just so that they get more revenue (and why would the other fare setter, e.g. TPE in this hypothetical example, do that anyway!).
 

TurbostarFan

On Moderation
Joined
8 Aug 2016
Messages
462
Location
UK
No, ORCATS will stick to the "printed" route restriction. Hence, for operators who operate along slower routes (e.g. Northern for Manchester to Leeds via Hebden Bridge), it is slightly more advantageous for the default route to be "Any Permitted" than "via X", as there is a chance they will get some of the revenue. Of course, in most cases, they don't control both routes and it would be questionable for them to collaborate with the fare setter of the "via X" fare to change it to "Any Permitted" just so that they get more revenue (and why would the other fare setter, e.g. TPE in this hypothetical example, do that anyway!).
Does this apply even if you obtain a zero fare excess from the ticket office or guard?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top