Many, many years ago I travelled over the Weymouth Quay line where the railman walked in front of the train on the section through the town. The speed restriction must have been walking pace!Just crawled out of Three Bridges due to a 5mph restriction.
Is it possible to impose a slower speed restriction, or is the next level down zero mph?
How is that even controllable? Walking at that speed would be difficult enough.0.5mph is the lowest speed I’ve seen
Weren't freight locos intended for MGR fitted with special slow-speed control to allow the train to discharge properly? Although IIRC that wasn't as low as 0.5mph (20cm/second).How is that even controllable? Walking at that speed would be difficult enough.
Tyseley Yard had a signed restriction somewhere of something like 3 or 4mph.Just crawled out of Three Bridges due to a 5mph restriction.
Is it possible to impose a slower speed restriction, or is the next level down zero mph?
Video125's Cornish Branches video covering the Fowey branch revealed that locos are fitted with the ability to maintain this speed to facilitate the China Clay wagon safety catch releases ahead of the contents being unloaded. I'm guessing a similar feature exists for any former coal-power station unloading area.How is that even controllable? Walking at that speed would be difficult enough.
Does that have a standard speed restriction sign, and if so does it read '0.5'?0.5mph is the lowest speed I’ve seen
That's not quite right.If the restriction is ‘ boarded’ as an emergency or temporary speed restriction “ 5” is the lowest speed stencil sign available .
The photos show ESR / TSR equipment and range of speed stencils .View attachment 209744View attachment 209745

Good point, looks like 011, 06, 08, and 09 are available options too
I doubt it..... they're just far more plausible TSRs viewed upside down.....Good point, looks like 011, 06, 08, and 09 are available options too
There's one on the Maesteg branch, certainly. North Berwick as well, although I don't know if it's been changed as I haven't travelled on the North Berwick branch.As a rule, depots are usually 5mph and any buildings (including fuel roads and trains washes) are generally 3mph.
I know there's plenty of 10mph PSRs out there but are there (m)any 5mph PSRs on the mainline?
Are those the only speed signs in the UK in km/h, or are all HS1's also thus?Carriage wash speed at Temple Mills when washing is 3kmh for 373 and 5kmh for 374; boy does 3kmh feel slow![]()
The rest of HS1 is km/h, as is the Cambrian line.Are those the only speed signs in the UK in km/h, or are all HS1's also thus?
Are those the only speed signs in the UK in km/h, or are all HS1's also thus?
Tyne and Wear Metro shared sections also signed in KM/HAre those the only speed signs in the UK in km/h, or are all HS1's also thus?
Im fairly sure Northern City line is not, ETCS supports displaying speeds to the driver in mph (it was needed for overlays on Thameslink and GWML/Heathrow), so now no need to convert to kph.The rest of HS1 is km/h, as is the Cambrian line.
Not sure about the Northern City line.
Some of the Slow Speed retrofits (certainly the Class 33s, I think they were fitted for the Train Ferry Loading?) Had an odd possible reaction to a failed slow speed in that they went full power! Therefore there was an instruction to test with a clear bit of railway ahead!Slow speed fitted freight locos, 56 and 58 fitted with speedo that went up in 0.5 increments between 0 and 3 mph For loading / unloading MGR Merry Go Round circuits
NCL is mph. ETCS doesn't natively support mph but there is a 'useable for custom purposes' packet that the GB network uses to tell the train to convert to mph. Part of the reason, I believe, is to avoid lineside and staff training changesIm fairly sure NCL is not, ETCS supports mph (it was needed for overlays on Thameslink and GWML/Heathrow) so now no need to convert to kph.
Yes, good point.NCL is mph. ETCS doesn't natively support mph but there is a 'useable for custom purposes' packet that the GB network uses to tell the train to convert to mph. Part of the reason, I believe, is to avoid lineside and staff training changes