• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

"Invincible" class Through-Deck Cruisers/Carriers

Status
Not open for further replies.

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
It's more like sprinklers - they might not stop a fire but having them means that any fire is small and goes out quickly before it can do much damage.

Tell Kim Jong Un. Being in control of a basket case country has not stopped him sabre rattling. Mutually assured destruction only has to not work once.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,627
Location
Scotland
Tell Kim Jong Un. Being in control of a basket case country has not stopped him sabre rattling. Mutually assured destruction only has to not work once.
The DPRK-USA relationship is most definitely not an example of mutually assured destruction. There is nothing mutual about it.

They have, between a dozen and twenty tens of kiloton class weapons. The USA has several thousand megaton class weapons. Kim Jong Un is going to sabre rattle, but the only way he will actually use his nukes is in a scorched-earth role. Despite the rhetoric from the US administration, absent an attack (or belief that an attack is under way) the North Korean nuclear arsenal is not a threat to South Korea, the US or any of their regional partners.

An India-Pakistan nuclear war is a greater threat.
 

fowler9

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2013
Messages
8,380
Location
Liverpool
The DPRK-USA relationship is most definitely not an example of mutually assured destruction. There is nothing mutual about it.

They have, between a dozen and twenty tens of kiloton class weapons. The USA has several thousand megaton class weapons. Kim Jong Un is going to sabre rattle, but the only way he will actually use his nukes is in a scorched-earth role. Despite the rhetoric from the US administration, absent an attack (or belief that an attack is under way) the North Korean nuclear arsenal is not a threat to South Korea, the US or any of their regional partners.

An India-Pakistan nuclear war is a greater threat.

I don't know mate. North Korea only has to pose a minor nuclear threat to Japan, South Korea and a few other places and what do you reckon North America is going to do to it?
 

najaB

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Aug 2011
Messages
33,627
Location
Scotland
I don't know mate. North Korea only has to pose a minor nuclear threat to Japan, South Korea and a few other places and what do you reckon North America is going to do to it?
I honestly think the most likely response to severe instability in DPRK leading to a genuine threat of nuclear war is a conventional Chinese invasion, with the back-door blessing of the USA (possibly in the form of a 'it never existed' agreement to stop so strongly opposing Chinese reintegration).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top