• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Interior handles, what was BR policy about them?

Status
Not open for further replies.

renegademaster

Established Member
Joined
22 Jun 2023
Messages
2,215
Location
Croydon
.I don't think most LHCS Mark 1 coaches had them, Mark 2 and 3s didn't. I heard this was a safety feature to stop children opening the door while the train was in the motion. However the southern diesel units in preservation I've been on have interior handles that are this small tab you push sideways. Some of the SR/LBSC coaches the Bluebell have the same basic design too. What was the official policy on interior handles?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,397
Location
Somerset
.I don't think most LHCS Mark 1 coaches had them, Mark 2 and 3s didn't. I heard this was a safety feature to stop children opening the door while the train was in the motion. However the southern diesel units in preservation I've been on have interior handles that are this small tab you push sideways. Some of the SR/LBSC coaches the Bluebell have the same basic design too. What was the official policy on interior handles?
First generation units had them as well. Small children would have had a terrible job trying to open the door with them - as did anyone else who tried. Think Mk 3s had interior handles originally but they were quickly removed.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
18,306
Location
Glasgow
.I don't think most LHCS Mark 1 coaches had them, Mark 2 and 3s didn't. I heard this was a safety feature to stop children opening the door while the train was in the motion. However the southern diesel units in preservation I've been on have interior handles that are this small tab you push sideways. Some of the SR/LBSC coaches the Bluebell have the same basic design too. What was the official policy on interior handles?
First generation units had them as well. Small children would have had a terrible job trying to open the door with them - as did anyone else who tried. Think Mk 3s had interior handles originally but they were quickly removed.
They were fitted to the Mk2D as new, with the door droplights normally being locked shut by carriage key - due to the air con system.

After a series of incidents with people falling from trains, it was decided to remove the internal handles and plate over the mechanism with the droplights then left permanently unlocked.

AFAIK, as a result of the early experience with the Mk2D, the 2E, F and all Mk3 designs had no internal handles fitted when they were built.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
9,397
Location
Somerset
They were fitted to the Mk2D as new, with the door droplights normally being locked shut by carriage key - due to the air con system.

After a series of incidents with people falling from trains, it was decided to remove the internal handles and plate over the mechanism with the droplights then left permanently unlocked.

AFAIK, as a result of the early experience with the Mk2D, the 2E, F and all Mk3 designs had no internal handles fitted when they were built.
Probably correct - though IIRC the Mk3s may have been designed with the potential to have them.
 

greyman42

Established Member
Joined
14 Aug 2017
Messages
5,368
First generation units had them as well. Small children would have had a terrible job trying to open the door with them - as did anyone else who tried.
Yes, they required a lot of force to open the door from the inside. A child would have little chance. Passengers just dropped the window and opened the door from the outside. Perhaps they were designed this way as to negate the chance of accidently opening the door from the inside, such as leaning against or bumping the handle.
 

Western 52

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2020
Messages
1,672
Location
Burry Port
On the first generation DMUs the internal sliding handles were very stiff and hard to use. Often easier to pull the window down and use the external handle.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
8,331
Location
Herts
Central door locking of course prevented many many falling of train instances - particularly in the "Tamworth Triangle" - there was an odd coincidence between alcohol and mishaps.

I recall being told by the BTP that one individual was recorded as the highest blood alcohol levels in this scenario , ever recorded at the post mortem.......
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,958
Location
Airedale
Mk1 "suburban" stock (ie where doors were adjacent to seats) had interior handles, vestibuled/side corridor stock didn't. Various SR "main line" EMUs mixed and matched - I suppose you don't want windows being opened all the time on suburban trains because of draughts etc (there were enough of those anyway....).
 

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
17,565
Location
Isle of Man
The 308s still had interior handles when they moved to West Yorkshire. They were so stiff I was never really able to use them to open the door, I generally used the external handle. There may have been a knack to them but if there was I never discovered it.
 

ajs

Member
Joined
2 Feb 2018
Messages
164
Yes, they required a lot of force to open the door from the inside. A child would have little chance. Passengers just dropped the window and opened the door from the outside. Perhaps they were designed this way as to negate the chance of accidently opening the door from the inside, such as leaning against or bumping the handle.
I do recall one incident on a 4-Cig where a young woman sat by the door and allowed her child to play with the door handle. Going across Farlington Junction at line speed , the door flew open, woman & child screamed and someone managed to grab the door and close it before anyone pulled the communication cord.As far as l know it was not reported but it could have ended up very differently.
 

Trackman

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2013
Messages
4,274
Location
Lewisham
On the first generation DMUs the internal sliding handles were very stiff and hard to use. Often easier to pull the window down and use the external handle.
I've seen adults on their knees grappling with it, before someone has said open the window.
Think Mk 3s had interior handles originally but they were quickly removed.
Did they? You could be right, I remember the plate on the inside as if something was there.
 

Tester

Established Member
Joined
5 Jul 2020
Messages
1,703
Location
Watford
I do recall one incident on a 4-Cig where a young woman sat by the door and allowed her child to play with the door handle. Going across Farlington Junction at line speed , the door flew open, woman & child screamed and someone managed to grab the door and close it before anyone pulled the communication cord.As far as l know it was not reported but it could have ended up very differently.
Are you sure it was a 4-Cig?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,356
Location
Yorks
I do recall one incident on a 4-Cig where a young woman sat by the door and allowed her child to play with the door handle. Going across Farlington Junction at line speed , the door flew open, woman & child screamed and someone managed to grab the door and close it before anyone pulled the communication cord.As far as l know it was not reported but it could have ended up very differently.

Are you sure it was a 4-Cig?

VEP ?
 

MarlowDonkey

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2013
Messages
1,863
Mk1 "suburban" stock (ie where doors were adjacent to seats) had interior handles, vestibuled/side corridor stock didn't.
Western Region DMUs (117s and 121s) had interior handles and doors adjacent to seats. In practice they needed a strong grip, so standard operating practice, by commuters at least, was to drop the window and put your arm outside. That was necessary as well on intercity trains as Mk2 and Mk3 coaches didn't have internal handles,
 

Rescars

Established Member
Joined
25 May 2021
Messages
2,551
Location
Surrey
Mk1 "suburban" stock (ie where doors were adjacent to seats) had interior handles, vestibuled/side corridor stock didn't. Various SR "main line" EMUs mixed and matched - I suppose you don't want windows being opened all the time on suburban trains because of draughts etc (there were enough of those anyway....).
I remember these horribly stiff internal catches in the 4-SUBs (as well EPBs). Were they a BR innovation, or were they around pre-1948?
 

ajs

Member
Joined
2 Feb 2018
Messages
164
Are you sure it was a 4-Cig
Pretty sure it was a Cig. Back in the day the Portsmouth Harbour - Waterloo service was generally 12 coaches - Cig/Big/Cig. The 2nd and 3rd coaches had a door in the centre of the coach which was in a seating bay of 4. Tended to avoid those seats as you were in the way when people wanted to get on or off.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Definitely not a Vep which had doors at each seat. Unit l refer to had bays of 4 seats.
 

Tester

Established Member
Joined
5 Jul 2020
Messages
1,703
Location
Watford
Pretty sure it was a Cig. Back in the day the Portsmouth Harbour - Waterloo service was generally 12 coaches - Cig/Big/Cig. The 2nd and 3rd coaches had a door in the centre of the coach which was in a seating bay of 4. Tended to avoid those seats as you were in the way when people wanted to get on or off.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==


Definitely not a Vep which had doors at each seat. Unit l refer to had bays of 4 seats.
To the best of my memory, Cig/Bigs did not have interior door handles - Veps did.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
113,402
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I do recall one incident on a 4-Cig where a young woman sat by the door and allowed her child to play with the door handle. Going across Farlington Junction at line speed , the door flew open, woman & child screamed and someone managed to grab the door and close it before anyone pulled the communication cord.As far as l know it was not reported but it could have ended up very differently.

I've seen a kid fiddling with one on a Class 101 DMU, I mentioned it to the parent who seemed convinced it wouldn't open and refused to do anything. Fortunately the kid wasn't strong enough to end up dead.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,958
Location
Airedale
To the best of my memory, Cig/Bigs did not have interior door handles.
TBH I can't remember, but I would think it quite likely that the doors in seating bays, of which there where several (including a 4-across "coupe" bench in the DTC), had interior handles. BEP/CEP MBSOs had similar, as did 4TC DTSOs. Anyone able to check?
 

Mat17

Member
Joined
17 Aug 2019
Messages
962
Location
Barnsley
I remember them mostly on suburban layout trains. Some other DMUs did have them. I recall 101s sometimes had them. I think 114s might have had them too. Edited to add, memory correct.


I could never open the doors using the latches as s child. As an adult, I found using the thumb to squeeze the latch works well, fingers less so.
 
Last edited:

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,356
Location
Yorks
I wonder if a damaged door could have been replaced by a VEP one for some reason.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,356
Location
Yorks
On 114s? I've found a few pictures of sets with them. I assume they all had them. It ties in with my memories of them as a child.

I thought we were talking about CIG's (421's in modern speak).

I don't know if the old DMU's had the same body profile as mk1 stock.
 

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,958
Location
Airedale
TBH I can't remember, but I would think it quite likely that the doors in seating bays, of which there where several (including a 4-across "coupe" bench in the DTC), had interior handles. BEP/CEP MBSOs had similar, as did 4TC DTSOs. Anyone able to check?
It turns out (I've asked on another group) that said units were "outside handle only" like l/h Mk1 corridors.
 

Mike Machin

Member
Joined
19 Aug 2017
Messages
382
I seem to remember some MK1 main line stock had the internal door opening ‘handle’ too. It was almost a small, very stiff lever in a recessed area which required some strength to move it left to right. They were usually chromed out had two arrows to indicate which one had to push the slider to open.

Growing up on the Southern, all of the suburban emus and demus had this form of opening, as did the VEPs. I seem to recall that the main line units had this door opening mechanism too, but they were removed around 1971 after a number of accidents involving people opening the doors while the trains were running at quite high speeds.

The mechanisms were simply removed and the area on the doors where it had been was plated over. I recall the Daily Express reported the change at the time with the headline ‘safety doors for ton-up train’!
 

Big Jumby 74

Established Member
Joined
12 Feb 2022
Messages
2,244
Location
UK
Here's a view showing the interior 'handle/latch' on a 4 Vep (4 'Draft'....:lol:..). Often very stiff as the whole mechanism would be trying to turn, and the latch was only large enough for a thumb or two fingers at most. As others have said was often easier to drop the window and use outside handle.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

Pretty sure it was a Cig
One's grey cells may be tired, but didn't the exterior compartment door in the end compartment behind each driving cab on Cig's have the Vep style door latch on the inside?
 

Attachments

  • BJ-4 Vep 7777. Bournemouth Central, 16.12 to Waterloo. 250487.jpg
    BJ-4 Vep 7777. Bournemouth Central, 16.12 to Waterloo. 250487.jpg
    426.5 KB · Views: 70
Last edited:

30907

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Sep 2012
Messages
21,958
Location
Airedale
One's grey cells may be tired, but didn't the exterior compartment door in the end compartment behind each driving cab on Cig's have the Vep style door latch on the inside?
Several comments on a FB group say no.
The Hastings diesel TFKs would be another - the very last mainline stock built with doors to each compartment.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,356
Location
Yorks
Several comments on a FB group say no.
The Hastings diesel TFKs would be another - the very last mainline stock built with doors to each compartment.

The VEP's were a lot more recent than those.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top