• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Improving the current collection on a Farish N Gauge Class 101 (+ others ?)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,428
Location
Sheffield
My N gauge Farish class 101 wasn't the best over isolated points and track imperfections and I remember reading somewhere that a guy soldered jumper wires in to improve it.
I was never convinced by the current collection wipers and checking with a meter on my Class 101 it seemed it was the current collection from the inside wheelsets was worse then that from the outers, though in the end I ended up putting jumpers to chassis from both wheelsets.
I tried to obtain some ultra thin wire but was unsuccessful. As it happens I concluded that the wire did not have to be insulated so I used single wire strands. They seemed fairly flexible but I put a coil (see middle pic) in each to try and minimise flex and therefore maximise length of service before they break.
The inner jumper wires soldered to the chassis (see pic) but the outers were more awkward to solder so I had to trap the wires behind the screwed on chassis "end plugs"
It has been a couple of weeks now and the current collection (and therefore slow running) on the unit really is very much improved.

Farish N Gauge Class 101 DMU bogie jumper wire 700W L5.jpg

Farish N Gauge Class 101 DMU bogies jumper wirse 700W L5.jpg

Farish N Gauge Class 101 DMU bogie jumper wire front connection 600W L5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
18,931
Location
Devon
My N gauge Farish class 101 wasn't the best over isolated points and track imperfections and I remember reading somewhere that a guy soldered jumper wires in to improve it.
I was never convinced by the current collection wipers and checking with a meter on my Class 101 it seemed it was the current collection from the inside wheelsets was worse then that from the outers, though in the end I ended up putting jumpers to chassis from both wheelsets.
I tried to obtain some ultra thin wire but was unsuccessful. As it happens I concluded that the wire did not have to be insulated so I used single wire strands. They seemed fairly flexible but I put a coil (see middle pic) in each to try and minimise flex and therefore maximise length of service before they break.
The inner jumper wires soldered to the chassis (see pic) but the outers were more awkward to solder so I had to trap the wires behind the screwed on chassis "end plugs"
It has been a couple of weeks now and the current collection (and therefore slow running) on the unit really is very much improved.

View attachment 127069

View attachment 127070

View attachment 127071

I must say that that’s some pretty good work you’ve done there Justin. Pretty fiddly but pick up problems were one of the main issues with older models.
 

Harpers Tate

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2013
Messages
2,050
It's a long time since had the space to have an N-gauge layout and I did have a Farish 101. And it, too was awful. With mine, one significant problem was that the powered bogie (i.e. with the current pickups) was not a precision item; the two sides weren't quite parallel, meaning that only two wheels - one on each side - were actually making good contact with the rail. I always thought it a pity that GF didn't have Fleischmann engineering skills and/or that Fleischmann didn't make British designs. Their (German design) DMU was nothing short of excellent.
 

Justin Smith

Established Member
Joined
14 Nov 2009
Messages
1,428
Location
Sheffield
It's a long time since had the space to have an N-gauge layout and I did have a Farish 101. And it, too was awful. With mine, one significant problem was that the powered bogie (i.e. with the current pickups) was not a precision item; the two sides weren't quite parallel, meaning that only two wheels - one on each side - were actually making good contact with the rail. I always thought it a pity that GF didn't have Fleischmann engineering skills and/or that Fleischmann didn't make British designs. Their (German design) DMU was nothing short of excellent.
Mine (this one) must be a slightly newer model and has both bogies powered.
I find current collection on many N gauge locos to be poor. My old Lima Class 31 for example, it only has current collection on one bogie though that model actually has a copper wiper onto the axle of the unpowered wheelset on the powered bogie and I have added a wire from that to the motor (that only picks up the current from one rail though). My Grafar 0-6-0 Pannier tank can only have current collection from three axles ! I sometimes wonder if 0-6-0s should be sold with facility to take power from an adjacent waggon (or coach) with pick ups. I suppose most layouts these days are DCC and therefore do not have insulted points and thus have less problems with current collection ? If so such an idea would become less and less in demand as time went on anyway ! ? !
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top