• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

I'm thinking of a train class..

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
Oh we're so close now must be able to do it by elimination... 315s are only used by NXEA so can't be them, 323s not in the south east, 325s didn't replace any unit class, same with 332s... Class 360?
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Well done (eventually). The 360 is correct.

Seemingly often forgotten about by enthusiasts
Just look here, and see how few people even remembered it existed - and also at how long it took you guys! :lol:
presumably due to it lacking one feature that most of its contemporaries have
No corridor connections, unlike most other Siemens units
this unit is or was a fairly common sight in certain parts of the south of England
GEML and GWML
One of its main introductions saw it replace a 4-car unit that holds special recognition as the last in a long series
The 312 was the last of the BR MUs to be built with slam-doors
In addition, among its main operations, there is a large difference in the kind of operation this class runs or ran
GEML is outer-suburban and sometimes express; GWML is local and airport-transfer
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
That was really good actually... the forgotten about thing showed itself very clearly in this.

Ok here's mine:

A class number often confused with something unrelated. A cab design that's hard to tell from other classes. Replaced by an infrastructure development and never carried unit numbers.
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
Nope... although that is a close match to the clues. Cab is even more hard to distinguish from relatives than the 504 one was from its sister classes though...
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
Nope... I'll give you another small clue, you're all thinking in the wrong part of the numbering system!
 

Hydro

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2007
Messages
2,204
Class 125? Confused with IC125, built for Lea Valley Lines but replaced when electrified, looks like a 117/similar, in service '58 to '77.
 

Hydro

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2007
Messages
2,204
I'm a member of the one of the most successful BR families.

I was the last of my batch built.

I've worked under 3 different operators.

I have four engines.

I've never carried a revenue paying passenger to date.
 

Hydro

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2007
Messages
2,204
I'm a member of the one of the most successful BR families. Sprinter, naturally.

I was the last of my batch built. Last initial 150/1 built.

I've worked under 3 different operators. BR Research, Railtrack and Network Rail.

I have four engines. 2 x Cummins, plus 2 x Mercedes V6 diesel generators.

I've never carried a revenue paying passenger to date. True, this unit never carried a 150/1 designation, nor ever started life as a 150/1 - it was purposely fitted out for departmental purposes. It apparently ran as a class 180 for a while.

It's only fair MK Tom gets the next turn!
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
I've only just done one so even though I have one in mind I'll let Nym do it.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
I'm happy to if you don't want to though??? :p
 

MK Tom

Established Member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
2,458
Location
Milton Keynes
OK cool!

I am but one but I am the father of many, and was nearly the father of many more. I look like something I'm not.

See what you can make of that!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top