• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

IEP Foster Review published

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
26 Sep 2009
Messages
556
Location
Bishops Stortford
The long awaited Foster Review into the value for money offered by the Agility Super Express solution for the Inter City Express Programme has been published and is available for download at http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/iep/fosterreview/pdf/report.pdf

It is understood that the report was kicked around for quite some time between Sir Andrew Foster's team and the Department before a mutually acceptable form of words was agreed.

Nevertheless, the report appears to be highly critical of some aspects of the way the procurement has been managed to date by DfT.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Failed Unit

Established Member
Joined
26 Jan 2009
Messages
9,767
Location
Central Belt
Just picking up on a couple of points, London - Oxford / Cambridge us other EMU's. What is the point for Cambridge unless they are going to be 125mph would they save that much time on the ECML. Maybe us some of the surplus 390's (due to lack of demand on HS1) and run them on the London - Cambridge route, or even build more for both routes to keep the 125mph trains on fast lines policy alive.

Maybe a high quality connecting service to Aberdeen / Inverness (no such thing in my opinion), unless this connecting services is to drag the Electric train away from Edinburgh. I am sure by the time the HST is ready for retirement should the life extensions discussed take place then the route to Aberdeen will already have been electrified by then and probably the route to Perth as well meaning a very short drag to Inverness (I can't see the highland mainline ever getting wires)
 

WatcherZero

Established Member
Joined
25 Feb 2010
Messages
10,272
IEP has gone from 'Exceptionally High' BCR category to the borderline between 'Moderate' and 'High' BCR categories as spec alterations have changed, but the fall is mostly due to the cost of capital having increased, least its still positive :P

Report suggests that issues about having to change trains if IEP isnt adopted could be solved by hiring more platform Porters...uh huh

Upgrading 125's is feasible, if a couple of bodges required however it will do nothing to increase capacity.

Suggests that these intercity trains are now shorter than some suburbans (though not many outside London!) and longer trains should be run less often rather than having more shorter units to run offpeak.

Other options
 new interurban electric trains based on existing European designs for
newly electrified routes on the GWML;
 re-engineered IC125s for long-distance services that are mostly ‘off-wire’;
 re-engineered/cascaded electric commuter trains for services such as
London to Oxford and Cambridge;
 some destinations that are a short distance ‘off-wire’ served either by
diesel locomotives pulling interurban electric trains, or by extending the
wires;
 long-distance routes to Inverness and Aberdeen being served by highquality
connecting trains rather than through services.

Depending on the exact mixture of newly acquired, re-engineered and
cascaded rolling stock, and the technical approach to the provision of services beyond the present electrified network, it seems likely that more than half of the benefit on the East Coast route, and probably around three quarters of it on the Great Western routes, could be captured for between 40% and 60% of the cost.
Can this person do maths????
'If the costs of life extending 125's were incorporated into the base BCR of IEP it looks more unatractive' Well no, who would have thought including the cost of life extending trains into the base price of IEP would make it more unappealing?

'The independant advice recieved from consultants was of a good standard.'
'I was impressed by talks with Hitachi' (he keeps saying this)
'The innovative form of contract offers great rewards'
'A number of experts have doubts about the bi-mode’s likely performance, particularly in the hillier ‘off-wire’ regions where they will be called upon the most. Surprisingly, I found that there would even be increases in some journey times.'

'I suggest therefore that a pause for further reflection and analysis is needed, including a serious comparative analysis that reassesses the current IEP
proposition in an absolutely up-to-date VfM analysis which includes the range of credible alternatives. This should take no longer than six months.' (Or until the budget reviews have been completed perchance where if its cancelled a report can be produced that its a waste of money and if it was funded a report into its great value for money perchance?)

And in the appendix: 'Practical measures are available for where a refurbishment couldnt achieve full legislative compliance' Either that means getting an opt-out of legislation or it cant, how can something being unable to be made compliant have a practical soloution?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top