Grimsby town
Member
- Joined
- 4 Apr 2011
- Messages
- 852
There's definitely not enough experience in the public sector. It's pretty accepted that the civil service is too generalist with people being constantly rotated across departments. There's definitely an over reliance on consultants too and not enough public sector staff to engage with the consultants effectively. Obviously consultancies are business and try to sell their services and look for more work.If the consultants are telling the truth where is the truth to fantasy gap? Is there a lack of professional knowledge on the government side, with decisions on whether to ignore the consultants being taken by career CS or politicians? Otherwise it is in HS2 as the client creating a fantasy for the DfT/politicians.
Where should the challenge be - some kind of audit that the truth is flowing from reality to decision making?
Its difficult to have serious conversations about the pros and cons of relying on consultants because there's a lot of misconceptions about transport/engineering consultancy. I'm not far off 10 years experience and I'm certainly not on a six figure salary. If you look at the larger transport authorities such as TfL or TfGM, they publish their salaries and they're pretty much in line with what consultants earn. Local authorities tend to pay less but also have less contracted hours. A big problem with transport planning/engineering is that the pay isn't great and there's tendancy for staff to be poached by better paying industries.