• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How very intresting...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

2030720310

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2009
Messages
456
how 'in'date' is that document?, it may just be working on the original plan of NXEC to have the 90s working some services to Leeds (?)
 

Crossforth

Established Member
Joined
20 Aug 2009
Messages
1,337
Location
Lancashire
Either way, why would nxec only want 28 mk3s and 4 DVTs which means they must be loco hauled stock BUT, how in date are the documents?
 

37401

Established Member
Joined
12 Nov 2008
Messages
3,276
Location
Birmingham
7 cars per set
Im guessing NXEC wanted

cl90+Load 7 Mk3s+Mk3 DVT with the 90 facing north
 

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Did GNER ever actually run services using 90s? I've seen pictures of one in GNER livery (minus logos) but at Liverpool Street with a 'one' train...
 

matt

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
30 Jun 2005
Messages
8,840
Location
Rugby
Yes they have used 90s in the past on the MK4 sets. 90024 was one example.
 
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
535
So THATS the difference between them - I can't believe I never noticed that till now. I feel ashamed :cry:

/checks pictures

On the front was 82 215, on the back 91 126. I remember it because the 82 seemed 'different' - I don't see them often in GLC, and because it gave me a tone.
 
Joined
17 Aug 2009
Messages
535
well this one had a slightly different angled bonnet to the Windows, and a few other things I can't really think of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top