Tom B
Established Member
- Joined
- 27 Jul 2005
- Messages
- 4,681
Posts above summarise most of my thoughts with far greater depth and experience than I can contribute. However, I would add from my own experience...
Do not assume that the MCBs are correctly labelled. Inaccuracies, changes/extensions of circuits, changes of room use etc all contribute to the label not being 100% reliable. Hence why always checking first is best.
You can get audible socket testers (CPC IN05839 or similar) which can be very useful in tracing circu8ts. I personally would not use a non contact tester to verify a circuit dead before working on it. They are useful devices for many purposes and are useful for fault finding (piece of equipment is off - first check, is there power to it) etc, but I wouldn't trust my safety with one the 'other way round'.
Do not assume that the MCBs are correctly labelled. Inaccuracies, changes/extensions of circuits, changes of room use etc all contribute to the label not being 100% reliable. Hence why always checking first is best.
You can get audible socket testers (CPC IN05839 or similar) which can be very useful in tracing circu8ts. I personally would not use a non contact tester to verify a circuit dead before working on it. They are useful devices for many purposes and are useful for fault finding (piece of equipment is off - first check, is there power to it) etc, but I wouldn't trust my safety with one the 'other way round'.