• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How Chiltern Railways chalks up success

Status
Not open for further replies.

Metroland

Established Member
Joined
20 Jul 2005
Messages
3,212
Location
Midlands
From the Victorian arches to the Eliza Doolittle flower stalls, Marylebone station serves as a reminder of all that people romanticise about rail travel in Britain. It may surprise devoted users, then, that the inspiration for the service that operates from it is American.

Back from a holiday in the US and sporting the emblematic bald eagle on his tie, Adrian Shooter, the chief executive of Chiltern Railways, says the group’s business is modelled on Southwest Airlines, “the only airline in the US that has been consistently profitable” and a model for low-cost flying.

This translates into simple, frequent trains, with fast turnround times to keep expenses down.

But if Mr Shooter has been running one of the most popular railways in Britain on those principles since 1994, the company has hit the radar because it is a potential template for other operators as the franchise system has come in for criticism.

In the wake of the furore over the planned renationalisation of the East Coast mainline, Chiltern Railways stands out for its willingness to invest in its services and its high score in passenger satisfaction surveys. Many politicians are pointing to a connection between the two.

The secret may be the unusually long 20-year franchise that Mr Shooter negotiated in exchange for putting millions of pounds into the station and services. That has seen the company extend the London to Birmingham line to Kidderminster in one direction and Stratford upon Avon in another.

It has also bought new trains, installed more signalling, brought disused tracks back to life, renovated old stations and built a new one – Warwick Parkway in Birmingham. Both passenger numbers and trains have doubled since privatisation in 1996 when Mr Shooter took part in a management buy-out from British Rail.

The company is now owned by Deutsche Bahn, the state-owned German operator. But the team running the railway has been in place for 15 years and its success is based on its investment in staff as much as its finances, says Mr Shooter.

To this end every one of its 750 employees has been in to see him within a month of joining “so they know what they are trying to do, have a continuity of purpose and are proud to work in the business”, he says. A mission statement tacked to the walls of each office in Marylebone station urges staff to welcome customers.

But there is also more hard cash involved. The company is investing a further £250m in schemes that will shave 20 minutes off the two-hour journey time to Birmingham – taking curves out of the track, for instance. It is planning to build a route from London to Oxford by 2012, providing the first rail services to the north of the university town.

Mr Shooter says there is “nothing in principle” to stop other rail operators negotiating similar long-term franchises in exchange for investment.

But he concedes that this has not been the government’s latest thinking. Instead, it has reacted to each negative press headline by tightening rail contracts to the point where you have “someone providing a detailed service like emptying dustbins”.

Most rail operators are tied into seven-year franchises, where they have little control over their costs, their fares, their train frequency, stock, or length. Chiltern Railways is subject to some of these restrictions, with 70 per cent of its fares regulated by government. But its contract gives it more freedom to invest – and it is there for the long haul.

The first company to introduce ticket barriers, much of Chiltern’s success has been achieved by an attention to detail. When it ordered new trains it helped to design the specifications.

It introduced more doors to help people get on and off more quickly, installed more comfortable seats, provided air-conditioning and patented its own model of laptop-friendly tables. At the stations, it chooses retailers carefully.

There are no first class carriages because they are thought to cause resentment and the company considered that “if the trains were right for business people they would at least exceed the specifications for others”, says Mr Shooter.

Critics would argue that the railway is small, and has few of the physical constraints that many of the other train operators have to contend with. But many would agree with Mr Shooter that most rail contracts have got the balance between freedom and regulation wrong.

After all, he says, “If you are going to go through the upheaval and angst of bringing in the private sector, it doesn’t make sense to remove flair and innovation.”

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/291d1848-8521-11de-9a64-00144feabdc0.html
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,774
Um
It introduced more doors to help people get on and off more quickly
What alternate reality is this from? 168s and the forthcoming 172s have the same number of doors as the 165s they started with, and all are evolutions of the Networker design. There's some thoroughly bizarre claims made in that article. Which is a shame.
 

MKB

Member
Joined
15 Oct 2008
Messages
666
My experience of Chiltern (going from Warwick Parkway to/from Wembley Stadium) a handful of times has not been good.

- No seat reservations possible
- Uncomfortable seats
- Alcohol bans not declared at time of ticket purchase
- No toilet facilities at stations despite 60-minute plus waits for trains
- Doors between carriages locked meaning that to get to an on-board toilet you had to change between carriages at stations
- Poorly organised queueing at Wembley (although that has improved of late)
- No onboard catering
- Special event timetables not loaded into booking systems until a day or two before the date of travel

Chiltern would be fine for a sub-30 minute commuter service, but it's not good enough for long-distance travel.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
21,178
Location
0035
Chiltern would be fine for a sub-30 minute commuter service, but it's not good enough for long-distance travel.
Interestingly enough, commuters on the Aylesbury line (including the local MP and councils) rated them very poorly as they saw that they were focussing too much on the Birmingham route.

Maybe you can't blame them given it has more trains and would probably bring in more money.
 

thefab444

Established Member
Joined
27 Oct 2006
Messages
3,688
Location
The New Forest
Does Aylesbury not get any Clubman services anymore then? I'm sure some of the peak services used to be booked 168.
 

scandal

Member
Joined
13 Apr 2009
Messages
109
Location
European Union
I can understand the complaints of the Aylesbury line, considering it takes an hour to cover the 40 odd miles. That said the lines maximum speed is 75mph, and south of Amersham about 60, trains often calling Harrow and all stations north of Moor Park doesn't help the timings I shouldnt think. Really there should be some consideration of fast services from commuters north of Amersham to Marylebone, but I expect pathing is the main issue preventing it and the worsening of services to passengers north of Moor Park. That said the only real worthwhile improvements to the Aylesbury line, in which significant improvements from line speed enhancement would be noticed/improved BCR would be extension of services onto the east west link and possibly expansion northward toward Rugby and the M1.

On the whole I do think Chiltern have done very well considering what they inherited from NSE, regular fast serivces to Snow Hill, Kidderminster and Stratford all coming into service as well as new trains, capacity and linespeed improvements. They are also very good with the cheap ticketing, last year they offered a £5 single to London or £3.30 with a YPR.
 
Joined
5 Feb 2009
Messages
1,012
Location
Milton Keynes
trains often calling Harrow and all stations north of Moor Park doesn't help the timings I shouldnt think. Really there should be some consideration of fast services from commuters north of Amersham to Marylebone.
I think that what they should do on that section is call at harrow, then express to amersham, then have all stations trains and non stop trains on to aylesbury
 

Ascot

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2005
Messages
3,384
Location
Birmingham, UK
I don't have much experience on the London Commuter services but on the Brum services I use them pretty much every time. They are usually quiet where I sit (passengers pile on the front at Snow Hill and back at Marylebone), trolley dolly comes through and they have air conditioning. Plus their family travelcard offer was brilliant when starting college! London Midland though is the cheap option from Birmingham though.
 

williamn

Established Member
Joined
22 May 2008
Messages
1,672
On the whole I do think Chiltern have done very well considering what they inherited from NSE.

I think what they inherited - i.e. a completely modernised route, track, trains and stations - is a key part of why they have done so well!
 

bluenoxid

Established Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
2,660
Missed off the bottom of the OP's quote.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2009. You may share using our article tools. Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.

Be careful. A lot of the British newspapers have been getting annoyed. A recent report I read about it revealed that they were prepared to make a move on google.
 

TDK

Established Member
Joined
19 Apr 2008
Messages
4,164
Location
Crewe
In comparison to other TOC's Chiltern is way ahead with customer satisfaction and their views for the future and Adrian Shooter is possibly the best Railwayman in comparison to other TOC chairpersons/MD's.

It is easy to criticise anything but when comparing to other companies there isn't any competition or any other TOC who even come close to what Chiltern have achieved
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,835
Location
Nowhere Heath
I refuse to travel with Chiltern, since it's so dreadfully boring. What really annoyed me though was having 165029 on a Clubman service from Marylebone to Snow Hill a couple of years ago. That was not an enjoyable journey!

Maybe it's because I prefer to get to my destination on a real train where the opportunity exists and at a proper rate of speed. If I was needing a bit of doss and going from London to Birmingham, then I'd go for Chiltern. Other than that, I'd have to go a different way.

That article is bizarre in claiming something about first services north of Oxford. So hasn't the XC and FGW services been running for Goodness knows how many years in their reality?
 

General Zod

Member
Joined
5 Jan 2008
Messages
590
I must say that for commuting into London or for leisure activities I personally am quite satisfied with Chiltern's performance stats. In comparison with other Home Counties' TOCs we are quite fortunate. I can still recall smoky 70s and 80s when we used to travel by the DMUs ! Perhaps the longer distance journeys to Birmingham could do with trains with some cosmetic and comfort alterations. I am not a big fan of the "sliding tables" and we could do with some extra luggage space. Mind you for as little as £19.50 for a Super Saver Return between London - Birmingham Moor St. we do get a reasonable deal. Are there any plans to use newer trains on the London - Birmingham route ? I travelled back on a Class 168 the other day and from the inside it looked like it could have done with a facelift.It looked tired, haggard and well worn.

regards,
Z
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
19,685
Class 67 + 4 re-furbed MkIIIs next year, and eventually 172s for High Wycombe stoppers.
 

TDK

Established Member
Joined
19 Apr 2008
Messages
4,164
Location
Crewe
I refuse to travel with Chiltern, since it's so dreadfully boring. What really annoyed me though was having 165029 on a Clubman service from Marylebone to Snow Hill a couple of years ago. That was not an enjoyable journey!

Maybe it's because I prefer to get to my destination on a real train where the opportunity exists and at a proper rate of speed. If I was needing a bit of doss and going from London to Birmingham, then I'd go for Chiltern. Other than that, I'd have to go a different way.

That article is bizarre in claiming something about first services north of Oxford. So hasn't the XC and FGW services been running for Goodness knows how many years in their reality?

For an enthusiast maybe a bit boring but the general public probably would not notice the differece between a 165 & a 168 and Chiltern are not putting trains on to please entusiasts.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,835
Location
Nowhere Heath
Maybe not, but putting a 165 on a Clubman service was not well received by myself. Bad enough the route's dreadfully boring as it is, but to put a 165 on it just seemed dreadfully unfair at the time! First impressions last I'm afraid!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top