• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

How are you all coping with the £3 cap?

Status
Not open for further replies.

A S Leib

Established Member
Joined
9 Sep 2018
Messages
3,372
Plusbus helps with the cost if getting a bus to connect with a train, but the lack of non-paper tickets for a lot of the country (I think there's eticket Plusbus trials in Luton and Cambridge?) makes spontaneous journeys less useful if the only way to get a ticket for the bus to the station is at the station.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Vexed

Member
Joined
12 Jan 2020
Messages
666
Location
Herts / Hants
As I’ve mentioned I’ve seen the data behind what is a £1.50/£2/£2.60/£3 fare and the vast majority are £3…

Also I strongly dislike not publishing fare tables and being expected to turn up and either ask on the day or just pay and see what you get charged via TOTO
But the majority of passengers only travel along part of the route (route dependent of course) so there are probably more cheaper short/medium distance fares sold than expensive end to end. I'm assuming you're talking about the actual fares available here and not sale numbers.

Some operators are getting to £3 in too short a distance.

Fully agree about publishing fare tables. Locally Uno published a very basic one which didn't mention some short distance fares still at £2, one of which I used today (3 miles)! It's better than nothing though. Luckily the full one is at bustimes.org/fares
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
30,938
Location
UK
Being able to buy a train ticket on your phone and include the bus, so you can walk out your door and onto the bus first has to happen as quickly as possible.

Then for many, the bus cap won't matter as you'll have one single ticket and over time the industry and Government can work on more competitive fares that work on multi modal transport.

As you tap in from bus to train to tram to bus, the fare can be divided accordingly and automatically. An e-ticket will be better than plain contactless, which will remain as a convenient alternative but not a replacement entirely.
 

richard13

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2019
Messages
281
Firstly from previous surveys, fares are not the top factor affect transport use - availability, safety, convenience, ..., come higher.
The really poor only leisure travel for a purpose and the fare is only a small part of the overall trip cost - cost of shopping, entertainment, food and drink, etc is always much more.

Urban single fares (within the fare zone) seem mostly under £3
London £1.75
Manchester £2
Birmingham £2.90
Bristol/Bath £2.40 (and <6 miles out of zone)
Exeter/Torbay/Barnstaple £2
York £1.50 (TOTO) or as much as £3 via the app!

Rural and Interurban fares will have gone up to £3, but that is often not unreasonable.

Various Day/weekly/... cards & caps are usually cheaper than this for multiple journeys.
 

WAB

Established Member
Joined
27 Jun 2015
Messages
1,300
Location
Anglia
Firstly from previous surveys, fares are not the top factor affect transport use - availability, safety, convenience, ..., come higher.
The really poor only leisure travel for a purpose and the fare is only a small part of the overall trip cost - cost of shopping, entertainment, food and drink, etc is always much more.
Yes, I'm a believer in the £2 cap because I usually have to inconvenience myself quite considerably to make the bus work for me. Higher fares to me are a charge for the inconvenience.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,410
Location
Yorks
Firstly from previous surveys, fares are not the top factor affect transport use - availability, safety, convenience, ..., come higher.

I don't know who's undertaken these surveys, but that sounds like balderdash to me.
 

Gloster

Veteran Member
Joined
4 Sep 2020
Messages
13,036
Location
Up the creek
I travelled for the first time today and did not notice any problems: most people on the island either use an ENCTS card or cashless. It is possible that many people using cashless methods do not notice what the fare is: they just hear a beep and that’s it.

Southern Vectis did away with returns many years ago, but in the last couple of years they have made it virtually impossible to buy anything but £2/£3 singles for each leg of a journey if you aren’t using a card or ‘phone. You can get a Day Rover, but I have been unable to find out if they have raised the price now that the fare has gone up to £3; it was £10.80. They have also kept a £2 fare for one section out of Newport on the 1 to Cowes. It should also be possible to buy through fares, which might be better value now: £4.80 for a trip wasn’t worth it before, but will be now if they don’t put the fare up (and some of the younger drivers are unfamiliar with it).
 

YouLostAStar

Member
Joined
6 Dec 2024
Messages
32
Location
Bristol
in the Southwest our tickets are supposed to be £2.40 but buying them on the app they are £3
 
Last edited:
Joined
8 Feb 2021
Messages
1,062
Location
Manchester
But the majority of passengers only travel along part of the route (route dependent of course) so there are probably more cheaper short/medium distance fares sold than expensive end to end. I'm assuming you're talking about the actual fares available here and not sale numbers.
Again, having seen the data, it is a lot more £3 fares than shorter ones. From Theatre Royal on the 6 for example, as soon as you get past the hospital it is £2.60 and after Burton Stone Lane it’s £3 (if I’ve read it right)
Firstly from previous surveys, fares are not the top factor affect transport use - availability, safety, convenience, ..., come higher.
The really poor only leisure travel for a purpose and the fare is only a small part of the overall trip cost - cost of shopping, entertainment, food and drink, etc is always much more.

Urban single fares (within the fare zone) seem mostly under £3
London £1.75
Manchester £2
Birmingham £2.90
Bristol/Bath £2.40 (and <6 miles out of zone)
Exeter/Torbay/Barnstaple £2
York £1.50 (TOTO) or as much as £3 via the app!

Rural and Interurban fares will have gone up to £3, but that is often not unreasonable.

Various Day/weekly/... cards & caps are usually cheaper than this for multiple journeys.
York’s £1.50 fare is for up to 3 stops in very short succession. Most singles in York are £3 not £1.50
 

GusB

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2016
Messages
8,165
Location
Elginshire
I’m sorry but this is nonsense. Those people who may have been tempted onto the bus by the £2 fare cap have now seen a 50% increase at the fare box. That’s the price they pay, which frankly is all that matters. And it does hurt, and it’s going to drive people back to their cars.
It isn't nonsense. The fare cap, as intended, was supposed to take some of the financial pressure off existing bus users, which it largely did. It was never intended to be a permanent measure.

I agree that the cap will have attracted a certain amount of new business, and that those passengers will technically be seeing a 50% increase. If they are using the bus for a short hop in town I can see why some may feel aggreived, but it was clear from the outset that the measure was temporary. It doesn't change the fact that for many bus journeys, a £3 single fare is still very good value.

If we want a future where more people get the bus, headline fares have to be lower. If that means government has to step in to keep them artificially low, tough.
I'm not going to disagree with you on this point. There is certainly a conversation to be had about fares being too expensive in the first place, but who bears the cost? If the government has to pay the subsidy, that money has to come from somewhere
 

RT4038

Established Member
Joined
22 Feb 2014
Messages
5,461
I don't know who's undertaken these surveys, but that sounds like balderdash to me.
I suspect that ENCTS holders (and Local Authority issued school bus pass holders, if interviewed) will have a different view of value for money than those travelling short distances on flat fares?
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
44,410
Location
Yorks
I suspect that ENCTS holders (and Local Authority issued school bus pass holders, if interviewed) will have a different view of value for money than those travelling short distances on flat fares?

That's a fair point.

I currently have no view on bus fares in West Yorkshire as they're effectively already pre-paid as part of my Metro card. I imagine such situations are commonplace on the buses.
 

Lewisham2221

Established Member
Joined
23 Jun 2005
Messages
2,751
Location
Staffordshire
I’m sorry but this is nonsense. Those people who may have been tempted onto the bus by the £2 fare cap have now seen a 50% increase at the fare box. That’s the price they pay, which frankly is all that matters. And it does hurt, and it’s going to drive people back to their cars.

If we want a future where more people get the bus, headline fares have to be lower. If that means government has to step in to keep them artificially low, tough.
But the cap wasn't introduced as a means of attracting people onto buses, it was a temporary stop gap introduced during a time of rampant inflation and out of control energy costs. Both have since settled, and the minimum wage has risen twice since the fare cap was introduced.

Oddly, the fare cap was significantly more than that. It didn't simply prevent operators from raising fares as a result of inflation/energy costs, it significantly reduced almost every existing bus fare, thus making fares artificially low. Locally, pre-cap fares were £1.80 - £2.70 for local journeys and £3.00 - £6.00 for longer journeys (upto around 18 miles).That was two years ago, those fares - after being artificially suppressed for 2 years - are now £1.90 - £3.00. The cynic in me thinks that if .gov had changed the cap to £2.50, operators would've totally done away with any sub-£2.50 fares, leaving us in a worse situation.

Of course, none of this is taking into account the existence of daily/weekly etc tickets, contactless capping etc either. I have no doubt that there are some people having to pay cash for a single on each leg of a multi-leg journey, in areas where they have to catch multiple buses operated by different companies. I also have no doubt that almost all of those people will still be better off with a £3 cap than they were before.
 

DDB

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2011
Messages
728
Hopefully the new powers that local authorities will have over bus services will mean more multi operator tickets and caps will be able to be brought in which will help with the "have to catch two buses with different operators" cases which must be a tiny minority anyway.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,834
Location
West of Andover
One of the reasons the £2 cap worked well was because it covered almost all routes, including in areas without an interavailable day ticket (which is a lot of England outside the Combined Authority areas). It also worked well because it meant you weren't penalised for using the train or a taxi one way and then the bus the other. I would imagine that the costs of implementing interavailable return or day tickets, even if they do cost £6, across all of England would be a lot more than the £2 cap was so that certainly doesn't seem likely any time soon. Interavailable tickets between buses and trains are very rare outside of the combined authority areas.

I wasn't on about the Interavailable tickets including multiple modes of transport (Buses/Trams/Trains), but better promotion of those multi-operator Bus Only products, like the "MyBus Oxfordshire" Ticket. Ones which tend to be hidden away as the bus operator would prefer to sell punters a day ticket for their buses only for a similar amount.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,311
Location
Bolton
I wasn't on about the Interavailable tickets including multiple modes of transport (Buses/Trams/Trains), but better promotion of those multi-operator Bus Only products, like the "MyBus Oxfordshire" Ticket. Ones which tend to be hidden away as the bus operator would prefer to sell punters a day ticket for their buses only for a similar amount.
Indeed but most places lack a scheme of that kind, or have one but it costs more than £6 a day.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
22,834
Location
West of Andover
Indeed but most places lack a scheme of that kind, or have one but it costs more than £6 a day.
However for someone who has to use 2 (or more) buses to get from A to B (and hence will now be paying £6 each way rather than £4) they can work out better value.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,311
Location
Bolton
However for someone who has to use 2 (or more) buses to get from A to B (and hence will now be paying £6 each way rather than £4) they can work out better value.
While this is of course true, changing buses is usually deeply unattractive. There is very rarely an indoor waiting area and very rarely are both routes frequent enough that it's a viable option given the high risk of missing the connection. If you have car access you'd use that over a journey with a change between buses. Realistically nobody is going to switch from driving to four buses per day unless have no choice, or are an enthusiast, and in that case they will already know about all of the ticket options because they'll have looked into them.
 

AndrewE

Established Member
Joined
9 Nov 2015
Messages
7,353
Surely that's what happens in life... You pay more for a lack of inconvenience/a better service etc.
but it doesn't explain how a price which has gone up 50% for some people is justified if we want to encourage the use of public transport. Your justification (or explanation) is just "Devil take the hindmost."
 

Via Bank

Member
Joined
28 Mar 2010
Messages
761
Location
London
Of course, none of this is taking into account the existence of daily/weekly etc tickets, contactless capping etc either. I have no doubt that there are some people having to pay cash for a single on each leg of a multi-leg journey, in areas where they have to catch multiple buses operated by different companies. I also have no doubt that almost all of those people will still be better off with a £3 cap than they were before.
But they are worse off than they were with a £2 fare cap. That’s the simple fact. Yes minimum wage has increased, but in real terms wages have stagnated. Fuel duty, meanwhile, has been frozen.

And if the long term plan is to eliminate the cap entirely and return to the world of inflated fares that are not just patently bad value, but also likely to be a mystery until you board, fine - but we should expect people to return to their cars in droves (or simply not make discretionary journeys.) If the government actually want bus patronage to increase, we can’t go back.
 

johncrossley

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2021
Messages
4,442
Location
London
While this is of course true, changing buses is usually deeply unattractive

But what choice is there? For most people, hardly any journeys are possible by direct bus. If we assume that journeys that can't be done by direct bus have to be done by car, we might as well give up now.
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
27,311
Location
Bolton
But what choice is there? For most people, hardly any journeys are possible by direct bus. If we assume that journeys that can't be done by direct bus have to be done by car, we might as well give up now.
Giving up before you've even started is definitely a good description for how a lot of the population see bus travel. And it's why some fairly long direct services work.
 

Baxenden Bank

Established Member
Joined
23 Oct 2013
Messages
4,759
Manchester to Rawtenstall 50 minutes for £3 I would still consider to be a bargain (Burnley Bus Co X43), the short trip after that is also £3 but for a ride of just a few minutes (Rosso 464) not such a bargain in comparison or as a standalone journey. Combined £6 is okay but I much preferred £4! The round trip I actually make would be the £14 Transdev day ticket without any cap, is £9 at the current cap, but has been £6 for the past 21 months.
 

johncrossley

Established Member
Joined
30 Mar 2021
Messages
4,442
Location
London
Giving up before you've even started is definitely a good description for how a lot of the population see bus travel. And it's why some fairly long direct services work.

In other countries, they realise it is impossible to offer direct buses to everybody so they make it as easy as possible to change. In cities where they achieve high modal share for public transport they manage to get people to change between buses/trams/metros etc. When you have the whole network at your disposal then you have vastly more journey opportunities compared to a direct bus.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top