• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Help: Response Letter, TFL DLR Fare Evasion

Status
Not open for further replies.

anxiouswriter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2025
Messages
5
Location
London
Hello,

Context:
This Saturday I had an incident with a DLR fare evasion ticket inspector at Bow Church who checked my Oyster which was low on credit and showed I hadn't tapped in to begin my journey. I explained that this was not intentional and I was not aware that my balance was low as I had just used the ticket for a bus earlier that day (which doesn't show you remaining balance like the train does). He then offered me a fine or said he could share my details with TFL to allow me to explain myself directly. I foolishly went for the second because I thought this meant an appeal process, not that I would be reported for fare evasion. The next day I went back to the location and managed to get the details of fare inspector supervisor for that area who clarified what my options were but shared that unfortunately it's too late to revert to a penalty fare because his colleague has already submitted an irregularity report. I've been sick to my stomach since thinking about what this might risk for my future. This is my first time getting into any kind of trouble so I didn't know how serious it could get (or that there's nothing to argue really) and keep beating myself up about not just paying the fine right there and then regardless of my mistake. In preparation, I've drafted a response letter for when I receive my verification letter - can I please get feedback? I've tried to address my remorse, mitigating circumstances and ask for a penalty instead of prosecution

This is the text alone (Ommited personal details):
To Whom It May Concern,
My name is _____. On the 13th of September at 18:20, during my DLR journey to Bow Church, I was reported for not having validation on my Oyster card (ID: _____) for my journey. To confirm, my mobile phone number is _____, my date of birth is ____ and my email address is _____. My correspondence address is _____

At the time of the incident, a fare inspector explained to me that I could pay £50 then, £100 later, or he could give my details to TFL so I could explain myself to determine an outcome, which he described as an opportunity to appeal. I’ve now come to realise that the options were not made clear to me and that this was rather a report to escalate from penalty fare to prosecution, which I am pleading to avoid, given my co-operation and mitigating circumstances. I wholeheartedly apologise for not tapping in. I travel on the DLR quite frequently to get to work and always tap my card. This was not an act of trying to deliberately evade the fare; this was a lapse in memory and focus. For the past five years, I have suffered from chronic spinal pain from my lower back to my neck, which has developed into causing intense headaches and tension that contributes to sleep deprivation, and though I receive physiotherapy and self-manage my symptoms, this does not stop the pain completely, and I still have episodes. When I do have an episode, it tends to affect my ability to rest, which in turn impacts my focus and may cause me to have moments of confusion and forgetfulness afterwards, especially if I have taken a strong analgesic, which I did before beginning my travels. In my state, I rushed to get a seat on the DLR after getting there, as a train was about to leave, and I mistakenly did not tap in properly.

I have the utmost respect for TfL and its workers and had no intention of trying to evade the fare I owed for that journey. Immediately after the fare inspector made me cognizant of my mistake, that evening, using the Oyster website, I ordered £50 to be put on my Oyster card, for the precise reason that I would be able to pay for all my upcoming journeys with TfL. I truly and genuinely had and have every intention of paying my way as I use this service. Additionally, I have no prior history of fare evasion and routinely pay my fares with either my Oyster or debit contactless card. I ask that you please take all that I have shared with you into consideration for a formal warning or to allow me to pay the penalty fine to conclude this regrettable matter without prosecution.

I have attached a letter from a work health assessment as well as my letter from my initial GP investigations, detailing how my chronic pain affects my focus, especially during times of stress and physical movement as evidence to show you that what I tell you is the truth, as well as the email from autoresponse@tfl.go.uk, which proves that I did order £50 to my oyster that evening and have every intention of paying my fares. Lastly, I have attached the payment record from my other card (Contactless ending in 7370) to demonstrate that I had been paying for fares throughout the day and the days before. This is all to say that evasion is not in my character and will never happen again. I take full responsibility for my actions, regardless of my state, and I commit to slowing down and taking care to double-check that I have tapped in in the future, regardless of the circumstances, to avoid such careless mistakes.

With sincere regrets,
[NAME]
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Titfield

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
3,227
I think your proposed reply needs some additional work:
1. It is very wordy.
2. There is a deep rooted contradiction in the statement you have made: I do not see how you can say "fare evasion is not in my character and will not happen again" when you also state that your medical condition impacts your focus and may cause you to have moments of confusion and forgetfulness.
3. With all due respect it seems to me that the failure to tap in was caused by you being in a hurry rather than you having a medical condition induced moment of confusion and forgetfulness.
4. The more I read your proposed reply the more I see that you are appearing to run two very different defences (1) the mistake (2) a medical defence. I do not think that is a good idea as it suggests (to me at least) that they are mutually undermining.

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

May I suggest you read the TfL Prosecutions Policy?
 
Last edited:

anxiouswriter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2025
Messages
5
Location
London
I desperately need to avoid prosecution due to my job and so really trying to provide as much mitigating evidence as I can but at the same time, do not want to come across as just giving excuses. My worry is that a genuine mistake and apology may not cut it

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

I desperately need to avoid prosecution due to my job and so really trying to provide as much mitigating evidence as I can but at the same time, do not want to come across as just giving excuses. My worry is that a genuine mistake and apology may not cut it
@Titfield
Thank you for your advice and sharing the policy - I have amended my run on sentences and shortened the letter. You're right, I was in a hurry but also I've been in a hurry before and if I was more alert this would not happen. Is there any way I can prove that this was not deliberate to reduce the likelihood of prosecution? and do you recommend removing my medical context?


My supporting documents are from a consultant detailing how my pain severity is of 8/10, results in two weeks episodes and poor sleep and a health assessment that highlights the link between chronic pain, and anxiety/mental fog when experiencing high stress moments. In this state, I also didn't really understand what the fare inspector was saying to be honest as it was a highly worrying and intimidating conversation - I would never opt into prosecution and after speaking to his supervisor the following day, I don't get why he even offered that to me as a means of 'explaining myself' when he also offered the penalty fare. I know this does not excuse anything and I feel foolish
 

Coleridge

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2023
Messages
179
Location
Penarth
I used to manage a department that dealt with customer correspondence, and I would very strongly suggest cutting that draft down to just a few sentences. Whoever deals with the letter will have a very large workload and will not have the time to read what you have written.

Just stick to the basic facts, presented clearly. You unintentionally failed to tap in; the usage history of your card shows that it was a one-off mistake; you apologise for your carelessness and will take more care in future; you hope that this matter can be concluded without prosecution. Nothing else is relevant.

(And make sure you write the letter yourself - that draft has some indications that it was composed by AI.)
 

anxiouswriter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2025
Messages
5
Location
London
Okay,I'll cut down to a paragraph. Thank you @Coleridge - and it's okay to not give an explanation as to why the mistake happened? No AI used, I'm just anxious so overexplaining/

== Doublepost prevention - post automatically merged: ==

New version:
Appeal to TfL for DLR Fare Evasion Mistake
To Whom It May Concern,
My case (no. xxxxxxx) is in relation to a ticket irregularity. My name is ____, and on the 13th of September at 18:20, during my DLR journey to Bow Church, I was reported for not having validation on my Oyster card (ID: ) for my journey. To confirm, my mobile phone number is , my date of birth is, and my email address is . My correspondence address is .

I would like to wholeheartedly apologise for this error. I travel on the DLR occasionally to get to work and always tap my card. I had used my Oyster card earlier that same day on a bus, and I did not realise my balance had dropped too low for a train journey and that I had not tapped in properly. This was not an act of trying to deliberately evade the fare.

I have the utmost respect for TfL and its workers and had no intention of trying to evade the fare I owed for that journey. Immediately after the fare inspector made me cognizant of my mistake, that evening, using the Oyster website, I ordered £50 to be put on my Oyster card, for the precise reason that I would be able to pay for all my upcoming journeys with TfL. I truly and genuinely had and have every intention of paying my way as I use this service. Additionally, I have no prior history of fare evasion and routinely pay my fares with either my Oyster or debit contactless card, which are both registered to my account. I ask that you please take all that I have shared with you into consideration for a formal warning or to allow me to pay the missed fare and any administrative costs to conclude this regrettable matter without prosecution.

I have attached an email from autoresponse@tfl.go.uk, which demonstrates that I ordered £50 to my oyster that evening and have every intention of paying my fares. Lastly, I have attached the payment record from my other card (Contactless ending in 7370) to demonstrate that I had been paying for fares throughout the day and the days before. This is all to say that deliberate evasion did not happen and regardless of my state or circumstances, moving forward I commit to slowing down and taking care to double-check when travelling that I have tapped to avoid such careless mistakes.
 
Last edited:

Titfield

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
3,227
Unfortunately this is still far too wordy and repeating information TfL have already.

I would suggest cutting it down as Coleridge has already suggested.
 

Coleridge

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2023
Messages
179
Location
Penarth
New version:
Appeal to TfL for DLR Fare Evasion Mistake
To Whom It May Concern,
My case (no. xxxxxxx) is in relation to a ticket irregularity. My name is ____, and on the 13th of September at 18:20, during my DLR journey to Bow Church, I was reported for not having validation on my Oyster card (ID: ) for my journey. To confirm, my mobile phone number is , my date of birth is, and my email address is . My correspondence address is .

I would like to wholeheartedly apologise for this error. I travel on the DLR occasionally to get to work and always tap my card. I had used my Oyster card earlier that same day on a bus, and I did not realise my balance had dropped too low for a train journey and that I had not tapped in properly. This was not an act of trying to deliberately evade the fare.

I have the utmost respect for TfL and its workers and had no intention of trying to evade the fare I owed for that journey. Immediately after the fare inspector made me cognizant of my mistake, that evening, using the Oyster website, I ordered £50 to be put on my Oyster card, for the precise reason that I would be able to pay for all my upcoming journeys with TfL. I truly and genuinely had and have every intention of paying my way as I use this service. Additionally, I have no prior history of fare evasion and routinely pay my fares with either my Oyster or debit contactless card, which are both registered to my account. I ask that you please take all that I have shared with you into consideration for a formal warning or to allow me to pay the missed fare and any administrative costs to conclude this regrettable matter without prosecution.

I have attached an email from autoresponse@tfl.go.uk, which demonstrates that I ordered £50 to my oyster that evening and have every intention of paying my fares. Lastly, I have attached the payment record from my other card (Contactless ending in 7370) to demonstrate that I had been paying for fares throughout the day and the days before. This is all to say that deliberate evasion did not happen and regardless of my state or circumstances, moving forward I commit to slowing down and taking care to double-check when travelling that I have tapped to avoid such careless mistakes.
There is still a great deal of repetition and unnecessary detail. I realise that you are anxious and want to give your side of the story but, believe me, brevity will work in your favour. Just stick to the facts (which, if what you have told us is true, are all you need).

You won't really be able to draft a response until you receive the letter. However, I suggest something along these lines.


To whom it may concern. [Dear Mr/Ms Xxxx would be better, if the letter you receive is signed]

Case no. xxxxxx

I apologise sincerely for not properly tapping in for the journey I made on 13 September 2025. This was not a deliberate attempt to avoid paying my fare but rather a one-off error, as I hope you can see from the usage history of my Oyster and debit cards. I greatly regret my carelessness, and will take more care in future.

I hope this matter can be resolved without resort to prosecution. I am, of course, willing to pay the fare owed and any administration costs incurred.

Yours faithfully,

Name
Address


For what it's worth, I think it's fairly clear that you made a genuine mistake here, and that this was not deliberate fare evasion. Try to put it out of your mind until you receive the letter from TfL. And then, if necessary, return for further advice.
 

anxiouswriter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2025
Messages
5
Location
London
Thank you, I will stick with this shortened version for now and wait for a verification letter with full details
There is still a great deal of repetition and unnecessary detail. I realise that you are anxious and want to give your side of the story but, believe me, brevity will work in your favour. Just stick to the facts (which, if what you have told us is true, are all you need).

You won't really be able to draft a response until you receive the letter. However, I suggest something along these lines.


To whom it may concern. [Dear Mr/Ms Xxxx would be better, if the letter you receive is signed]

Case no. xxxxxx

I apologise sincerely for not properly tapping in for the journey I made on 13 September 2025. This was not a deliberate attempt to avoid paying my fare but rather a one-off error, as I hope you can see from the usage history of my Oyster and debit cards. I greatly regret my carelessness, and will take more care in future.

I hope this matter can be resolved without resort to prosecution. I am, of course, willing to pay the fare owed and any administration costs incurred.

Yours faithfully,

Name
Address


For what it's worth, I think it's fairly clear that you made a genuine mistake here, and that this was not deliberate fare evasion. Try to put it out of your mind until you receive the letter from TfL. And then, if necessary, return for further advice.
Thank you, I will go with this shortened version for now and wait for a verification letter to send it off. I did speak to a solicitor who suggested the medical explanations/letters but maybe it's best that wait for if it escalates which I am praying it doesn't given that this is one-off and I was not abusing a railcard
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,458
Location
LBK
There is still a great deal of repetition and unnecessary detail. I realise that you are anxious and want to give your side of the story but, believe me, brevity will work in your favour. Just stick to the facts (which, if what you have told us is true, are all you need).

You won't really be able to draft a response until you receive the letter. However, I suggest something along these lines.


To whom it may concern. [Dear Mr/Ms Xxxx would be better, if the letter you receive is signed]

Case no. xxxxxx

I apologise sincerely for not properly tapping in for the journey I made on 13 September 2025. This was not a deliberate attempt to avoid paying my fare but rather a one-off error, as I hope you can see from the usage history of my Oyster and debit cards. I greatly regret my carelessness, and will take more care in future.

I hope this matter can be resolved without resort to prosecution. I am, of course, willing to pay the fare owed and any administration costs incurred.

Yours faithfully,

Name
Address


For what it's worth, I think it's fairly clear that you made a genuine mistake here, and that this was not deliberate fare evasion. Try to put it out of your mind until you receive the letter from TfL. And then, if necessary, return for further advice.
This is unsatisfactory as a response to TfL. OP - do not send this.

TfL usually do NOT settle out of court and if you read their Prosecution policy - which TfL sticks to religiously - they may default to prosecution unless there is certain mitigation. If the OP can evidence their medical condition and explain how this would reduce the public interest in prosecution this is perfectly acceptable, and in fact, recommended. Under no circumstances should they be advised to remove this important information which the investigator will be looking for in any response.

New version:
Appeal to TfL for DLR Fare Evasion Mistake
To Whom It May Concern,
My case (no. xxxxxxx) is in relation to a ticket irregularity. My name is ____, and on the 13th of September at 18:20, during my DLR journey to Bow Church, I was reported for not having validation on my Oyster card (ID: ) for my journey. To confirm, my mobile phone number is , my date of birth is, and my email address is . My correspondence address is .

I would like to wholeheartedly apologise for this error. I travel on the DLR occasionally to get to work and always tap my card. I had used my Oyster card earlier that same day on a bus, and I did not realise my balance had dropped too low for a train journey and that I had not tapped in properly. This was not an act of trying to deliberately evade the fare.

I have the utmost respect for TfL and its workers and had no intention of trying to evade the fare I owed for that journey. Immediately after the fare inspector made me cognizant of my mistake, that evening, using the Oyster website, I ordered £50 to be put on my Oyster card, for the precise reason that I would be able to pay for all my upcoming journeys with TfL. I truly and genuinely had and have every intention of paying my way as I use this service. Additionally, I have no prior history of fare evasion and routinely pay my fares with either my Oyster or debit contactless card, which are both registered to my account. I ask that you please take all that I have shared with you into consideration for a formal warning or to allow me to pay the missed fare and any administrative costs to conclude this regrettable matter without prosecution.

I have attached an email from autoresponse@tfl.go.uk, which demonstrates that I ordered £50 to my oyster that evening and have every intention of paying my fares. Lastly, I have attached the payment record from my other card (Contactless ending in 7370) to demonstrate that I had been paying for fares throughout the day and the days before. This is all to say that deliberate evasion did not happen and regardless of my state or circumstances, moving forward I commit to slowing down and taking care to double-check when travelling that I have tapped to avoid such careless mistakes.
This is an entirely satisfactory draft other than it needs to be closed with a call to action such as "I hope you will see fit to close the matter without resorting to prosecution - yours faithfully etc".
 

Coleridge

Member
Joined
14 Mar 2023
Messages
179
Location
Penarth
This is an entirely satisfactory draft other than it needs to be closed with a call to action such as "I hope you will see fit to close the matter without resorting to prosecution - yours faithfully etc".
I respectfully disagree. The OP has already expressed a desire (in paragraph 2) to conclude the matter without prosecution, and adding yet more wordy, repetitive text will reduce the chance of someone properly reading the letter. I agree, however, that this would be better at the close of the letter than lost in the middle.

I concede that I have no specific experience of TfL's policy with regard to prosecutions. If you believe that including detail of a medical condition might tip the balance towards a satisfactory outcome then of course it should be included, but it should not sound like a desperate excuse (OP - do you honestly believe that your medical condition led to your failure to tap in, rather than your simply not being aware of the balance on your card?) and the final letter should remain brief and succinct.
 

AlterEgo

Verified Rep - Wingin' It! Paul Lucas
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
29,458
Location
LBK
I respectfully disagree. The OP has already expressed a desire (in paragraph 2) to conclude the matter without prosecution, and adding yet more wordy, repetitive text will reduce the chance of someone properly reading the letter.
Our experience here is that TfL do read submissions properly, particularly where they introduce specific mitigation which TfL consider as part of their decision to prosecute or not. They read lengthier solicitors' letters, along with multiple pieces of evidence outlining medical conditions, evidence of impoverishment, etc.

It is entirely fine to ask for an out of court disposal more than once. Doing so isn't going to make any difference as long as the second mention is in the close of the letter and comes in the form of a call to action.

I concede that I have no specific experience of TfL's policy with regard to prosecutions.
TfL are a very different beast. They are competent, methodical, and usually prosecute. Responses to TfL need to be considered carefully because the line between prosecution and warning letter is very thin indeed.

They do not ever settle out of court for money; the binary options are prosecution under TfL Bylaws or a written warning, so asking for something which they themselves say they will not give is a non-starter. You can't just write like you'd do so to GTR saying "sorry I won't do it again, please just give me an out of court settlement okay".

Respectfully, if you are not familiar with TfL's unique way of working compared to other train companies, your advice will be misplaced.

If you believe that including detail of a medical condition might tip the balance towards a satisfactory outcome then of course it should be included, but it should not sound like a desperate excuse (OP - do you honestly believe that your medical condition led to your failure to tap in, rather than your simply not being aware of the balance on your card?) and the final letter should remain brief and succinct.
The OP says "I have attached a letter from a work health assessment as well as my letter from my initial GP investigations, detailing how my chronic pain affects my focus, especially during times of stress and physical movement as evidence" - that is entirely relevant and proportionate medical evidence, and introduced in an appropriate manner. It is up to TfL to decide if it constitutes sufficient mitigation, not us.
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
18,141

anxiouswriter

Member
Joined
15 Sep 2025
Messages
5
Location
London
Update [successful] : Thank you for the advice and clarification that I should not leave out any mitigating circumstances. I sent off the longer version of the letter with more detail around my health (specifically how it caused a lack of focus) and asking for a warning instead of prosecution. This was alongside 5 supporting documents - consultant/diagnosis letter, occupational health assessment and physio record which talks about how my condition impacts my mental state, and separately records from my 2 TFL payment methods demonstrating regular payments. I received a response yesterday giving me a warning
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top