Boxcars said:Alright, don't rub it in. :roll:
Did you say 60 fps :notworth:
I get 35fps if I'm stopped in a tunnel or trying to get the 66 up the banking.
Boxcars said:Alright, don't rub it in. :roll:
Did you say 60 fps :notworth:
matt said:You do know that the human eye can only detect about 15 - 20 fps
Stooopid said:Have you ensured that only the visible sides of faces are rendered, i.e. not using "AddFace2" everytime?
Cockfosters said:~~ 24fps I think is where it becomes un-noticable that they are frames.
LondonBVE said:Gareth Hale personally I shall say the MX/MX 400 is really good it has been with me for 3 years since I bought Window XP Home Edition. But because of technology being improved and more things needed a better graphics card I have to buy a new one. Hopefully I can find a good one like MX/MX 400.

Dennis said:An easy way of checking to see if any of the texture file sizes are too large is to open up the directory containing the textures, display the file properties and sort by file size. Any which seem excessively large can then be checked to make sure they are 8 bit images or resized if necessary.