• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Hawthorn Bank Level Crossing, Spalding - barriers up

Status
Not open for further replies.

jp347

Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
22
This is in our local paper (http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/news...ssing-barriers-in-upright-posistion-1-4572689).

Spalding Guardian said:
Fault leaves train crossing barriers in upright position

Barriers on two Network Rail level crossings in Spalding failed last week following a technical fault.

Flashing lights were used to warn motorists and pedestrians of approaching trains at the crossings on Hawthorn Bank and in London Road.

Engineers were called during the morning rush hour at 8.30am on Thursday and had rectified the problem by 12.30pm.

A spokesman for Network Rail said: “A fail-safe mechanism on the barriers allowed them to remain in the upright position and flashing lights were used to warn of approaching trains.

“In these circumstances, trains are run at a slower speed approaching crossings and only allowed through when safe.”

Park Road was closed from 5.30pm while engineers worked through the night on the Peterborough to Doncaster line.

This is part of the £280 million essential renewals to the track that runs via Spalding, Sleaford and Lincoln.

The work is expected to continue until 2014, but Network Rail says it will announce any further road closures that may affect Spalding residents.

In other parts of the region, there were a number of rail-linked incidents over the past week.

A 14-year-old boy died after being hit by a train travelling from Sleaford to Leicester near a foot crossing in Lincoln at 8.51am on Thursday.

On Wednesday, a four-year-old girl died in hospital after a crash involving a car and train at a level crossing. Emma Lifsey, of Haxey, was airlifted to Sheffield children’s hospital after Tuesday’s collision on a country lane near Misson, Nottinghamshire.

Scott Dobson, a 26-year-old rail worker, was hit by a train half a mile from Saxilby station, also on Tuesday, and the body of 51-year-old Robert Roy Poole, of Bingham, who had been hit by a train, was found in Grantham last Monday.

Police said Mr Poole’s death was not suspicious.


How exactly does this work? Is the train brought to a halt at the previous signal and then cautioned that it must check the crossing is clear manually? (It is MCB-CCTV at Hawthorn Bank.)
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

westcoaster

Established Member
Joined
4 Dec 2006
Messages
4,513
Location
DTOS A or B
Almost correct, the train will have passed the last signal at danger, proceeded at caution and stopped before the crossing and only passed over it when it is clear to do so.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,933
It is indeed perfectly correct to have trains across crossings under caution with the (failed) barriers up, as westcoaster describes, as long as you have the red road lights flashing. The comments on the news article linked to, however, shows how much the public understand these things (and also how much they think they know!).
 

MidnightFlyer

Veteran Member
Joined
16 May 2010
Messages
12,856
Comment in link said:
why dont they turn the barriers so that the tran stops and waits for a gap in the traffic?

It always confuses me that 20-30 vehicles are held up by a train carrying 5 people??????????????????????????????????????????????????????

How are they not in Mensa?
 

ainsworth74

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
16 Nov 2009
Messages
31,126
Location
Redcar
I think, perhaps, you're being a touch harsh here. Whilst it might be obvious to us why the train would take priority on a level crossing I can understand why the average person might think it strange that 30+ people have to wait for a train that might only have five people on it.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,933
I would imagine that Nitwit Rail and/or Police would have attended to marshall the road traffic also.

O L Leigh
Quite possibly, at least after the first couple of trains, but there's no requirement for them to be there.
If someone suitable from NR was present though, it'd be better to operate the barriers by hand than leave them up in the air!
 

jp347

Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
22
I believe that no-one was in attendance for quite a long time as there were cars ignoring the lights almost continuously.
 

SussexMan

Member
Joined
23 Oct 2010
Messages
553
A spokesman for Network Rail said: “A fail-safe mechanism on the barriers allowed them to remain in the upright position and flashing lights were used to warn of approaching trains.

Is it just me that finds it strange to call the barriers remaining up as a "fail-safe" mechanism? Surely the barriers remaining down would be fail-safe.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
35,942
Is it just me that finds it strange to call the barriers remaining up as a "fail-safe" mechanism? Surely the barriers remaining down would be fail-safe.

The fail safe is that the protecting signals will remain at red if the barriers are not proved down and the crossing clear. So the system is safe, even if it seems counter intuitive.
 

Tomnick

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2005
Messages
5,933
Strangely, one of the crossings mentioned (London Road) is an AHB, which is of course designed to fail 'down'. I'd confused with with the MCB outside the box when I first read the report. I'm struggling to think of a single cause that'd leave two crossings of rather different types with the barriers failed raised!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top