Peter Sarf
Established Member
Nicknames aren't just an enthusiast thing, many come from inside the industry. It not just the railways that do it either, many planes have nicknames, the military often uses nicknames, reporting names and codenames. Most modern train types are named anyway, often with far more stupid and irelevant names than the nicknames given. Nicknames do have some purpose too, they are often shorter and easier to pronounce than the real name (many are one or two syllables, wheras saying "class X" is always going to be at least 3 syllables if not 4).
Someone mentioned ANORAKS. Well saying "class 31" sounds more anorak to me than saying "TOFFEE APPLE" - does it not ?. I reckon the point of nicknames is to give a short easy to say/remember name. This name will probably reflect the look/behaviour of said object. Anyway it tends to humanise the object. OK a lot of nicknames might apprear for one loco and, arguably, a battle should ensue to arrive at a consensus.
I know the hydraulics (bias here) seemed to have one name for each class :- Warships and Westerns (wizzos is not far off) obvious from their name plates. Hymeks (pass but I think it was based from Hydraulic Mekhydro), Teddy-Bears for the class 17s (?). Nicknames are a way of personalising things. So my argument is they are a natural phenomenon - you cannot fight it. Only question is why do some classes of loco/unit achieve so many nicknames and no consensus seems to be arrived at.
Some classes never got a nickname - go on then prove me wrong...
