Hi. Why did Felixstowe get chosen by Hutchison/Government instead of Harwich?
By 1990 Harwich had excellent road connections north and south. More importantly, its railway was double track right up to its north and southwards connection near Manningtree.
Still more vitally important; all these lines were electrified to 25kv right into Harwich. Felixstowe did not have this virtue, and still doesn't! Obviously, electric locos could haul freight all the way from Harwich to Scotland and much quicker than underpowered diesel locomotives.
This shortening of journey times means that one driver can work from Ipswich to Crewe being there replaced by a driver who could work onwards to Glasgow.
Both can thereby keep inside their allotted five hour driving limit. This cannot be done with diesel.
I know, it is probably too late now. But what argument worked against Harwich all those years go, and environmental one?
By 1990 Harwich had excellent road connections north and south. More importantly, its railway was double track right up to its north and southwards connection near Manningtree.
Still more vitally important; all these lines were electrified to 25kv right into Harwich. Felixstowe did not have this virtue, and still doesn't! Obviously, electric locos could haul freight all the way from Harwich to Scotland and much quicker than underpowered diesel locomotives.
This shortening of journey times means that one driver can work from Ipswich to Crewe being there replaced by a driver who could work onwards to Glasgow.
Both can thereby keep inside their allotted five hour driving limit. This cannot be done with diesel.
I know, it is probably too late now. But what argument worked against Harwich all those years go, and environmental one?
Last edited by a moderator: