barrow trains
Member
- Joined
- 30 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 39
Hi, any idea please of standard Saturday diagrams for when GTR + C2C 387s can appear on GWR services, or just random allocations on the day? Cheers 


Best to look at RTT on the day now that allocations are shown for GWR services. The 387 fleet doesn't exactly have a wide sphere of operation on a Saturday.Hi, any idea please of standard Saturday diagrams for when GTR + C2C 387s can appear on GWR services, or just random allocations on the day? Cheers![]()
It is more that they can't work with GWR / GTR examples (other than 'boxed in') than they can't operate in a 12-car formation. Easier to keep them self contained.The c2c units operated as 12-car formations there. Why would they be limited?
From tomorrow they are on their own set of diagrams, 2 diagrams for 3 units encompassing solely Newbury work; so subject to usual caveats expect them to be a permanent feature for the time being.
As to the various questions as to why they’re only allowed on Newburys - it’s down to the SDO implementation on the c2c sets. GWR/HEx went over to a Beacon system with GPS backup a couple of years ago. The leading unit in a multiple formation is the “master” for SDO release; so a set formed up 73xx+71xx, would not be able to make use of the beacons, so a GPS release would have to happen instead; which due to inaccuracies of GPS and the way the database is now set up after the adoption of the Beacon system would mean only doors on the front unit would be unlocked - unnecessarily restrictive on the 8/9+ coach platforms of the Thames Valley. The only self-contained 4 car diagrams for 387s are the Newbury shuttles; so the quick-and-dirty way of ensuring they stay on them has been to slap the Newburys only restriction on them. They are authorised by the company ECS wherever a 387 is already allowed to go, and they can also run in multiple with “Classic” 387s ECS only.
Whilst they are only on temporary loan, it is not for GWR to start modifying the trains to get around those restrictions. If the loan does become permanent as has been rumoured elsewhere, then it’s a different story and we’d likely see some vinyl and SDO mods.
Hopefully that can draw a line under the 387/3 discussion.

Since the introduction of 345s, I am not confident of many 387s on London Paddington - Reading services. I reckon only the Didcot services now.
However most of these are heading back to their parent operators in the next month, so you might not have long to see them!
c2c does get a fair bit of tourist action at the weekends - it operates services to Stratford and Liverpool Street, which can get pretty full after a West Ham game. Also, Southend is a popular destination.Cant really see the need to reinstate those peak services now, demand is hardly going to pick up back to 2019 levels. Therefore little need for the 720s.
None of which flows were served by the additional peak workings operated by the six 387/3s.c2c does get a fair bit of tourist action at the weekends - it operates services to Stratford and Liverpool Street, which can get pretty full after a West Ham game. Also, Southend is a popular destination.
Does this mean more IETs are coming back into service, or are the387s required back at C2C?
there are (were) a few on fringe peak services. Usual GWR stopping pattern of Ealing, Hayes, Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford (and often West Drayton). From next week the half hourly Didcot stoppers resume so these go, and a handful of peak services go to XR (which is why the 7 car sets have come back west - see 345 thread)Since the introduction of 345s, I am not confident of many 387s on London Paddington - Reading services. I reckon only the Didcot services now.
there are (were) a few on fringe peak services. Usual GWR stopping pattern of Ealing, Hayes, Slough, Maidenhead and Twyford (and often West Drayton). From next week the half hourly Didcot stoppers resume so these go, and a handful of peak services go to XR (which is why the 7 car sets have come back west - see 345 thread)
Not sure if this is the right place or if there is a thread specifically about the c2c 387s with GWR, but I noticed today that according to real-time trains a c2c unit is working coupled to a GWR unit, which I know was being avoided before. Have the potential issues been rectified, or is RRT (or, as someone is sure to point out, the data being provided to it) being inaccurate?
Realtime Trains | 2K39 1314 Newbury to Reading | 12/02/2022
Real-time train running information for 2K39 1314 departure from Newbury to Reading on 12/02/2022. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
I thought this would be real considering the c2c 387s with GWR have now received GWR branding… still had the Trenitalia logos present though.Not sure if this is the right place or if there is a thread specifically about the c2c 387s with GWR, but I noticed today that according to real-time trains a c2c unit is working coupled to a GWR unit, which I know was being avoided before. Have the potential issues been rectified, or is RRT (or, as someone is sure to point out, the data being provided to it) being inaccurate?
Realtime Trains | 2K39 1314 Newbury to Reading | 12/02/2022
Real-time train running information for 2K39 1314 departure from Newbury to Reading on 12/02/2022. From Realtime Trains, an independent source of train running info for Great Britain.www.realtimetrains.co.uk
Well, one has today(387306), another (387301) still has C2C (both in Reading depot) and I didn't see the third set.I thought this would be real considering the c2c 387s with GWR have now received GWR branding… still had the Trenitalia logos present though.
Nothing officially confirmed yetApparently all 6 c2c 387s are to end up with GWR on permanent lease - is that true?
Theres another discussion elsewhere suggesting that they’re now going to SN, as part of the inward cascade after their 455 removal.Apparently all 6 c2c 387s are to end up with GWR on permanent lease - is that true?