DanNCL
Established Member
As I use them on an almost daily basis I'm quite honestly glad it isn't one! (I'll be so glad when those awful trains are finally replaced)I wouldn’t do that to you.
As I use them on an almost daily basis I'm quite honestly glad it isn't one! (I'll be so glad when those awful trains are finally replaced)I wouldn’t do that to you.
As I use them on an almost daily basis I'm quite honestly glad it isn't one! (I'll be so glad when those awful trains are finally replaced)
They look better than the what's used on the subway but they are absolutely awful to use. They're always breaking down, the windows often leak, the heating is either on a far too high setting or not on at all; the list of problems with them goes on; though with the announcement of funding to replace them a few weeks ago I live in hope that my commute will be on something of much better quality in a few years time!Not been on one actually but they look better than the Glasgow Subway units (haven’t been on those either)
Already had a 142. It’s not a unit.Class 142?
Or a carriage.Looks a bit like a Mark 3 Carriage?
Not a 91Class 91?
Er, either.Do you mean power cars?
Or a carriage.
No. A bit too electric...Class 92?
It’s a locomotive. And it’s not electric.Well that leads me to think it is one!
Not a 57 I’m afraid.Class 57?
You may have hit upon something there!Class 37?
Afraid notClass 37?
You may have hit upon something there!
It would appear I haven't thoughAfraid not