Good on the protesters, they've cost two 'private' companies aka DB schenker and EDF millions of pounds and made their point in quite an effective way. They've also annoyed legions of right wing head bangers. As protests go, that's a job well done.
I think it'd be far harder to access Heathrow's runway than to stage a demonstration on a coal train!Surely hundreds of global leaders flying off to NY has a detrimental effect on the climate.....perhaps standing on the end of the runway at Heathrow would have had a better media impact, saving the tonnes of CO2 and hot air being needlessly emitted by DC jetting of to yet another pointless talking shop.
Good on the protesters, they've cost two 'private' companies aka DB schenker and EDF millions of pounds and made their point in quite an effective way. They've also annoyed legions of right wing head bangers. As protests go, that's a job well done.
Good on the protesters, they've cost two 'private' companies aka DB schenker and EDF millions of pounds and made their point in quite an effective way. They've also annoyed legions of right wing head bangers. As protests go, that's a job well done.
Hope the protestors walked in an eco-friendly way from the nearest station or bus stop to the protest site, would hate to think of them as hypocrites.
With all the platitudes of Western nations ringing out stridently about global warning, what is the official view of the largest two industrial nations of China and India on this particular matter ?
Surely its far more hypocritical for world leaders to come together in New York for a conference on climate change when they'll have travelled there in aircraft which will have caused an awful lot of pollution!
They could not flown on loads of separate planes, the EU leaders could have travelled over on a specialt chartered plane.How would world leaders come together then ?
I think that they stopped a train because it's seen as a lot harder to stop a train thus making more of a statement.I wonder if the Greenpeace protesters can see the irony of stopping a coal train. Perhaps (sarcasm alert) it would be better if all the coal was transferred by road instead, as that way a single train can't be held to ransom. That would be a 'bonus' for the environment...
Good on the protesters, they've cost two 'private' companies aka DB schenker and EDF millions of pounds
They could not flown on loads of separate planes, the EU leaders could have travelled over on a specialt chartered plane.
I think that they stopped a train because it's seen as a lot harder to stop a train thus making more of a statement.
To be fair they have a point that we should be using far cleaner forms of energy rather than relying on coal, ideally we'd have more nuclear and renewable but hey ho
Shouldn't cost DB Schenker anything. In fact, the taxpayer will compensate them via Network Rail.
Fracking? Putin's gas? Nuclear? Would Greenpeace approve of those options?
Without significant use of fossil fuels or nuclear power, our nice electric train network will come to a halt, indeed there is already little slack in our power generation network.
"A reduced service is running from London Waterloo tonight, as the wind has dropped. Southwest trains apologises for any inconvenience caused"
Im not saying he shouldn't stop, but once he was stopped and realised he had been stopped by persons not authorised to do so then why not pull away again?
Pretty much every form of power generation is opposed by someone. Be it wind, solar, coal, gas or nuclear.
This might interest some of you - Live UK Power Mixture - http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/ and compare with France http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/france/
Presumably the driver would have had a strong suspicion that he had been stopped by a false hand danger signal that was being shown improperly or maliciously.
However the driver must also have had a slight suspicion that the signal was in fact a genuine and perhaps improvised indication of some emergency ahead, it would be foolhardy to proceed perhaps into danger.
I consider it likely that some of the protestors would have been dressed so as to at least somewhat resemble track workers. Orange overalls are widely available.
By the time the train was stopped or moving only very slowly, I presume that the protestors were on the track immediately ahead, and probably on the train.
To proceed would have risked killing them.
Fascinating, thanks for posting. UK demand 29.39gw, French demand 47.79gw, that's a huge difference. I would have expected them to be about the same.
Wouldn't taking the coal constitute theft? It's one thing to 'protest' but another to make off with the cargo whilst doing it!
Fascinating, thanks for posting. UK demand 29.39gw, French demand 47.79gw, that's a huge difference. I would have expected them to be about the same.
I hope the police all turned up in a car each.
And on a police train.
And sent a couple of helicopters up.
And then sent Greenpeace the bill.
Fascinating, thanks for posting. UK demand 29.39gw, French demand 47.79gw, that's a huge difference. I would have expected them to be about the same.
Im not saying he shouldn't stop, but once he was stopped and realised he had been stopped by persons not authorised to do so then why not pull away again?
Shouldn't cost DB Schenker anything. In fact, the taxpayer will compensate them via Network Rail.
You can bet your bottom dollar that had one of these idiots fallen from a wagon, or had there been a train coming the other way, the rest would be demanding DBS pay out millions in compensation.